From £38,5807
Diesel engines will be the obvious choice for most S-Max buyers, but is this petrol variant worth consideration?

What is it?

The lesser-powered petrol version of Ford’s new S-Max, and it’s likely to be a rare sight on UK roads.

That’s because Ford predicts that the diesel engines in the S-Max – four differently tuned 2.0-litre units – will account for 97% of sales in the UK, with the remaining 3% being split between the 158bhp and 237bhp petrol variants.

But don’t let modest sales predictions put you off. On paper, this 1.5-litre Ecoboost petrol engine that the S-Max range starts with is more than £1000 cheaper than the 2.0-litre diesel equivalent and shaves almost a second off the 0-62mph time, albeit with inferior fuel economy and CO2 emissions. 

For the private-buying, urban-dwelling big family, the engine looks like it could be a good fit, but is a faster petrol option really a better bet than the frugal entry-level diesels?

We drove this 1.5-litre petrol-engined version with front-wheel drive and six-speed manual gearbox in Titanium trim with an upgraded Sony infotainment system (£450), active park assist (£150), panoramic sunroof (£750), 18in alloys (£400) and the Titanium Family Pack (£400).

What's it like?

The S-Max has always done the practical stuff well, while still offering enough dynamic prowess to be fun. This generation is no different, and the 1.5-litre Ecoboost petrol engine also seen in the Ford Mondeo would seem to be a good affordable option here in the S-Max range.

This seven-seater carries some pretty serious bulk, though, and the powerplant feels a tad sluggish when dragging the S-Max up to higher motorway speeds. That said, it’ll rev out past 5000rpm without fuss, offering a smooth power delivery with minimal turbo lag.

The 177lb ft of torque drops off past 4500rpm, though, so there's no great sense of urgency in acceleration, and it doesn't feel particularly quick. But it is a refined engine, especially below 3000rpm where engine noise is kept to a whisper.

It’s an appropriate urban companion, then, but, while it handles typically well for a Ford family car, outside of its comfort zone on more open roads you’ll pine for the stronger diesel engines that offer better performance and do a greater job of hauling around this MPV's considerable weight. Claimed fuel economy of 43.4mpg and 149g/km of CO2 emissions also leave this S-Max trailing its diesel siblings.

Inside, the S-Max is practical, spacious and well kitted out. It's light and airy, too, at least on our panoramic sunroof-equipped test model. Titanium trim adds sat-nav, cruise control, automatic lights and wipers and lane-keep assist, as well as the new traffic sign recognition safety feature that will spot speed limit changes and adjust your limiter accordingly.

Avoid the optional £400 18in alloys though, as the ride is noticeably better and quieter on the 17ins that come as standard. Wheels aside, the suspension does well to soak up road imperfections, with only the harshest of potholes sending a jolt through the cabin.

Middle row passengers aren’t short on space by any means, but the third row is only really suitable for kids or smaller adults on longer journeys. Access to all seats is a doddle, with levers throwing the middle row up and forward to get to the rearmost seats, or down flat to create an immense 2020-litre load bay.

Back to top

Add on the nifty £400 Titanium Family Pack and you’ll also be able to fling down all the rear seats at the touch of a few buttons in the boot, and the second row gets tray tables and blinds.

Should I buy one?

The new S-Max is a refreshing alternative in a market with plenty of practical but bland options, and its dynamic abilities still present a compelling case for the MPV for those horrified at the prospect. 

Mid-spec Titanium trim remains our favoured option thanks to its generous kit list, but a sticking point on all S-Maxes is the price, and this petrol version is no exception. Although it’s the cheapest engine in this line-up, an equivalent Citroën C4 Grand Picasso will save you a further £2000 and offer better claimed fuel economy.The S-Max is dynamically far more impressive than the Grand Picasso, though.

Ultimately, while you’ll save some cash by choosing petrol power as a private buyer, the fuel economy will be significantly less impressive. The bulk of buyers - especially company car drivers - will be better off with the diesel variants.

Ford S-Max 1.5 Ecoboost SCTi 160 Titanium

Location Cheshire; On sale September; Price £26,245; Engine 4 cyls, 1498cc, turbocharged, petrol; Power 158bhp at 6000rpm; Torque 177lb ft at 1500-4500rpm; Gearbox 6-spd manual; Kerb weight 1645kg; 0-62mph 9.9sec; Top speed 124mph; Economy 43.5mpg (combined); CO2/tax band 149g/km, 24%

Join the debate

Add a comment…
xxxx 5 August 2015

maths before buying. When spening £27,000 you may as well enjoy

Basically it'll take about 2 and a half years for the diesel to make it worthwhile. In that time you'll have a noisy, slower and heavier car. Keep it for another year and you'll be about £400 a year better off, unless the DPF goes wrong that is! If I was spending £27,000 on a car I'd forsake £125'ish a year over 4 years for the reasons given. These figures deprication because that's not that easy to gauge and not that different with modern turbo'd petrol engines
Adrian987 4 August 2015

Couple of things

DPFs got a lot of bad reports a few years back. Is that the same today? My perception is that the tech is better now, so not so much of an issue, possibly the modern diesels have shorter warm-up times and other tech to assist keeping the DPF at operating temperature. My current 1yo will not allow the "stop/start" to operate, for example, if the DPF is in a regeneration cycle (which lasts about 10 mins). On the "A" pillars matter, the original Picasso we had was a real pain for visibility at times, and I would not want to go back to that A-pillar style.
spqr 3 August 2015

Stupid Question

"For the private-buying, urban-dwelling big family, the engine looks like it could be a good fit, but is a faster petrol option really a better bet than the frugal entry-level diesels?" YES! Because unless you drive tens of thousands of miles a year a diesel does not make economic sense and encouraging "urban dwellers" to have diesels is stupid because the DPF will never get hot enough to work popping out to Sainsbury's or doing the school run and it will fail potentially killing the engine and costing a fortune to fix.