Fun and charismatic - but buyers should check out the Seat Ibiza Cupra and Skoda Fabia VRS too

What is it?

This is the latest model to receive Fiat Group’s new Multiair technology. The Fiat Punto Evo Abarth gets a 1.4-litre turbocharged engine complete with the clever valve management system to enhance performance (particularly at low engine speeds), and improve economy and emissions.

One of the most significant upgrades is an Alfa Romeo-style switch to allow the driver to alter the car’s throttle response, steering weight and traction settings, though in the Abarth there are only two settings – sport and normal.

Fiat’s Torque Transfer Control system - which reduces understeer by braking whichever front wheel is losing traction - also makes a welcome appearance in the new Punto.

All the style tweaks that distinguish the standard Fiat Punto Evo also appear in the hot Abarth, including piano-black dash fascia, sat-nav docking system, clearer dials and revised styling.

What’s it like?

The engine is a big improvement over the old model. Multiair brings with it impressive low-end torque and general flexibility through the gears, and also makes the engine feel more free-revving. It makes for accessible performance whether you’re cruising home or trying to set a new lap record.

The six-speed gearbox it is mated to is less ideally suited to the Abarth. For a hatch that is intended to be a truly engaging drive the shift is too long and indistinct. It’s an improvement over Fiat gearboxes of old but it’s still not rewarding enough.

That’s not the only slightly unsatisfying aspect of the new Punto Abarth. The steering, though nicely weighted and responsive when in sport mode, always feels artificial and the brakes could use more finesse, having little modulation between light braking and full-on, hazard-lights flashing emergency stopping.

So clearly the Punto Abarth is no dynamic benchmark. But it is by no means a poor car. It has plentiful grip, which the TTC system effectively enhances by dragging the nose into line out of corners, and this together with the predictable handling means you can gainfully throw the Punto around and enjoy every minute.

We were only allowed on the smooth surfaces of Fiat’s Balloco test track, so final judgement on the ride quality will have to wait until a UK test. But what was evident is that there’s noticeably bouncy rebound over undulating surfaces – which could be a problem in urban Britain - but generally the setup seemed reasonably well-judged and coped very well on track.

And in normal mode? This is actually the biggest disappointment. Okay, so maybe around town you’ll want the lighter steering but in truth this softer setting makes the car feel sluggish in its responses. The Punto is clearly designed to appeal to those wanting a performance hatch that doesn’t compromise all elements of comfort and refinement, but it seems unnecessary to offer quite such a soft setting in a car wearing the scorpion badge.

Should I buy one?

If you want the best handling performance hatch available for under £17k, no. Renaultsport will sell you that. But in practice the Punto is a very different prospect to the more focused Clio 200.

It’s a well-priced hatch that offers a pleasing interior, an excellent combination of economy and pace and exploitable performance. The more powerful, similarly priced and arguably more rounded Seat Ibiza Cupra and Skoda Fabia VRS could be its biggest problems, but the Abarth Punto is fun and charismatic. That’s more than enough reason to buy one.

Back to top

Join the debate

Add a comment…
PHILBY 21 June 2010

Re: Fiat Punto Evo Abarth

It's funny how dynamics of cars are related to the country of each magazine because if you read a lot of magazines in different countries things are getting pretty confusing.

I have been to greece recently in which I have lived for many years and speak the language though I am not greek, and greek car magazines make for very interesting reading. The point of course is that since they don't have car industry you don't get that feel that they are biased in any way. Here are the conclusions of what they think are the dynamic benchmarks in every category:

mini: fiat 500

super mini: peugeot 207

small family car: Seat Leon

large family car: Mazda 6

small executive: BMW 3 series

executive: Mercedes E-class

small gti: Clio RS

big gti: Scirocco R

coupe: nissan 370z

mpv: ford s-max

suv: BMW X1

interesting huh?

Woigookin 20 June 2010

Re: Fiat Punto Evo Abarth


Straight Six Man wrote:
Personally, I think the Japanese have got it about right: over there, drifting is bigger than F1. I've seen some absolutely crazy Japanese drifting videos, where the driver is actually looking diagonally backwards over his shoulder in the direction of travel.
What exactly is your point?

glorfindel 20 June 2010

Re: Fiat Punto Evo Abarth

Straight Six Man wrote:
I would hardly call that a damning assessment of the Mini: if it breaks traction a bit more than the Fiat, well, that's just part of the fun
I've always thought this is the greatest difference between the italian and the english way of judging a car. For the italians handling is good if the car is quick and composed. Everything disturbing the driving experience is bad, while most of the time english magazines call it "fun". Alain Prost seems to agree with the italians. This is also the reason why nobody in Italy thinks of a Ford as an "handling benchmark", but just as a cheap and competent people mover (yes, in Italy Fords are usually cheaper than Fiats).