Most initial assessment of the FF was at least partially concerned with the question of identity; could this generously proportioned four-wheel-drive estate car really be considered worthy of the emblem plastered on its flanks?
Let’s tidy that one up first: yes, it most certainly can. It is not perfect or peerless like the 458, but its strengths are mighty, its demerits negligible and, crucially, it practically croons with character.
First, the strengths. There are many initial impressions to be left with on encountering the FF – its distinctive, almost strained appearance; its parking space-busting size; the utter perfection of its driving position – but all of these will be swept away by the chattering cough and percussive throb of its ignition.
The noise is liable to leave a mark on you every bit as real as the thumbprint you will have just deposited on its steering wheel-mounted starter button. Tickle the throttle and a sinful guttural giggle accompanies the first whoosh of a power delivery apparently oblivious to the FF’s accompanying 1880kg millstone.
As speed rises, the steering, light at slow speeds, inherits weight and clarity without telegraphing the technical endeavour required to get it there. It has obviously been made quick to disguise the FF’s mass and encourage deft changes of direction, but this has been achieved without the artificiality perceptible in the Mercedes SLS’s sometimes-hyperactive nose.
Together with a chassis built to chew through the quarreling computations of body control, grip limitation and suspension loading, and return nonchalant agility, the FF feels not just compliant in a user-friendly GT way, but malleable and accommodating.
All this makes car stupefyingly easy to drive up to seven tenths of its limit – as much you can sanely expect to achieve on the road – and, as such, keeps all the power firmly hot-wired to the rear axle, where it should be. In the dry, serious exuberance is required on roundabout-sized bends to press the front wheels into obvious service. Even then, this will only register as a cursory but perceptible tug from the nose as it sources sufficient traction to help trim the angle being created at the back.
Super-fast but non-threatening, svelte but seats four (it really does, and in some comfort) – where are the faults among the fanfare? Predictably, they languish much further back in the model’s practically minded repertoire. Chief among them is the ride quality, which, away from the continent, downshifts from praiseworthy into merely respectable territory.
Even with the car’s adaptive Manettino dial turned to its comfort setting, the FF is certainly not a sponge for soaking up the inconsistencies of English tarmac. More often than not it feels like a sponge being dragged hard and fast across a boxer’s mid-fight features; there’s a slim, pliable buffer beneath your hands for sure, but equally there’s no mistaking every significant cut and bruise.
Nevertheless, the result is not jarring or brittle, nor is there any hint of dislocation from the road surface. For many if not most the FF will feel coiled like a Ferrari should be, but it’s possible that for some of its money-no-object clientele the prospect of steering the family towards a distant country retreat would be better accomplished in something with a less-aggressive backbone.
Join the debate
The Special One
Ferrari continue to dominate
Ferrari are on top form, lately when they take design leaps they pull it off with astounding success. This is an all-round winner.
W124
Well written. Actually
Well written. Actually interesting and informative. I love the FF - not only because it's a direct rip off of the Interceptor FF - same name as well...
Amanitin
[quote=W124]it's a direct
excellent observation.
toptidy
W124 wrote: Well written.
Exactly, and I wish Jensen were in a position to sue them for every million possible because Ferrari don't take plagiarism well and if you give it you should be prepared to take it too. The Interceptor still looks way better than this abortion!
If I ever had this kind of budget I would have a 458 or similar for when I didn't have passengers and a Quattroporte/Merc CLS/BMW 650 or similar for when I did.
Horrible!
kraftwerk
toptidy wrote:W124
Eurgh. What a ghastly turn of phrase.
TBC
toptidy wrote: The
The Interceptor still looks way better than this abortion!
Eurgh. What a ghastly turn of phrase.
I agree, it shows an astonishing level of immaturity.
Peter Cavellini
negativity?!
Judging by the posts on this car i'd say they are missing the point,this as far as my memory takes me these days(no jokes now!) is a Ferrari that the fiscally well off might have as a Ferrari that 4 could get in,with weekend luggage, but comparing it to the abominations that blighted our road decades ago, this isn't all that bad, plus,the so called innovation of Ferrari's take on FWD seems to work, and of course no one will in there right mind go off road with it,if someone offered it to me, i wouldn't turn it down.
kdwilcox
I am not so sure about this
I am not so sure about this one,the cost is very high
and the ride it would seem is not the best.
When you carry four the ride is very important,i wait
for a full road test in the UK,lets see how it copes with
our wonderful roads.
Peter Cavellini
Ferrari FF.
I like it, a Ferrari different from the norm,what i mean is it's not simular in shape to other Ferrari's or any other supercars currently on sale, a road test against say the Panamera would be interesting.
Alex
This is divine. I have seen a
This is divine. I have seen a few on the roads and it looks even better. 4 wheel drive, space and power. What more do you need for UK roads? Wonderful!
Pages
Add your comment