7
It fails to inject any more fun into EV driving, but the Bolt certainly makes the prospect of ownership a greater reality - albeit not in the UK
18 November 2016

What is it?

General Motors infamously killed its first electric car, the EV1, having realised that America in the mid-1990s was not ready for an electron-fuelled future. Two decades on, the Chevrolet Bolt arrives not as atonement for the entirely rational decision to euthanise its forebear, but rather as an acknowledgement that the world has changed.

It’s a change that the Bolt is leading. No, it doesn’t entirely answer the criticisms most commonly levelled at EVs – that they cost too much and can’t go far enough on a charge. But it moves the goalposts on both of them. In the US, the Bolt costs just under $30,000 (£24,350 at current exchange rates) once a $7500 federal tax credit is applied against it. That’s cheaper than the BMW i3 but more expensive than the Nissan Leaf, yet the Chevrolet offers a huge increase in range compared with either – with an official EPA rating of 238 miles. That’s pretty much identical to the basic Tesla Model S 90, which is twice as expensive.

The Bolt uses an all-new battery pack, developed by GM and made alongside the electric drivetrain by LG Chem in Korea. The 288-cell pack holds an impressive 60kWh of charge, sits under the floor of the car and weighs 436kg on GM’s figures, while also serving as a stressed structural member. Drive comes from a single 149kW (197bhp) electric motor that features an integrated reduction gear and turns the front wheels.

What's it like?

Let’s start with the number that’s likely to receive the greatest scrutiny: the 238-mile range claim. The US Environmental Protection Agency test is meant to replicate real-world driving, and US media have managed to beat the official number under gentle real-world use. We didn’t get to run through a whole charge, but my time with the Bolt confirmed it’s possible to drive it impressively hard without melting the predicted range.

On our experience, and with the proviso that testing took place in generally warm ambient temperatures, the Bolt can be driven enthusiastically and will still manage more than 150 miles on a full battery. Only higher-speed cruising really gobbles charge, with the Bolt being limited to 93mph. It’s quick, too – fast enough to make the Leaf look like a golf kart.

Chevrolet’s claim of a 6.5sec 0-60mph time feels, if anything, conservative. As with most EVs, the motor gives its peak 266lb ft torque output from rest, and a keen start will chirp the front tyres. The throttle pedal makes it easy to modulate speed, and the transmission can be switched to a more aggressive 'L' mode that delivers maximum regeneration whenever you lift off, allowing the car to be driven most of the time using only the throttle pedal. Under hard acceleration, there’s a not-unpleasant electrical whining noise, reminiscent of the sound of an Underground train under power, but apart from that, refinement is excellent.

Handling is competent but lacks any real engagement, with no real sensation getting past the low gearing and springy-feeling power assistance of the steering. The Bolt’s suspension does a good job of keeping its considerable mass in check on everything but the roughest roads, but you feel the car’s 1624kg weight when asking it to change direction quickly. Michelin eco tyres have been chosen for low rolling resistance rather than outright cornering power and the lateral limits are low, with excess speed generating copious understeer. As such, it’s a typical EV, and we suspect few buyers will object – but it would have been nice to find some enthusiasm for more spirited progress.

The cabin features various familiar bits of GM switchgear and has materials that seem to have been selected for toughness and durability rather than upmarket vibes. (GM has disclosed that it is spending $8700 on each battery pack, so it’s small wonder that savings are being made elsewhere.) There’s a TFT instrument cluster that displays both minimum and maximum projected range numbers, depending on how the car is being driven. The central 10.2in touchscreen works well and has been given a redesigned interface to distinguish it from the other GM North American offerings that share the same system.

The only sizeable disappointment is with the Bolt’s styling; to European eyes, it looks like a slightly blinged-up version of a Meriva. We know the same battery pack and powertrain will underpin various other models; it’s surprising that GM didn’t choose to offer it as a more desirable crossover first. It’s bigger inside than it looks, with decent room for rear seat occupants (although with a roofline that taller passengers will find too low) and a decent 481-litre boot capacity on US testing methodology.

The size of the battery pack does knock recharging times, with Chevrolet saying it will take 10 hours to replenish it from empty using a 240V, 32A ‘Level 2’ charger. A fast charging port is being sold as an optional extra; that will be able to add around 90 miles of range in 30 minutes of charging from a compatible outlet.

Should I buy one?

There's a problem here, one that effectively negates GM’s claim to have created an EV for the world. Opel will be bringing a version of the Bolt to Europe, rebranded as the Ampera-E, but there won’t be any right-hand drive production. It’s difficult not to see this decision as being a major own goal, given that it in effect excludes a third of the world from experiencing this extremely promising car.

That’s a huge shame for British buyers who have been waiting for an electric car that can beat the meagre range of existing offerings. Here’s hoping GM brings us the technology in another form soon. 

Chevrolet Bolt

Location Michigan, US; On sale January 2017 (US, not sold in UK); Price $37,495 (before $7500 federal tax rebate); Engine AC electric motor; Power 197bhp; Torque 266lb ft; Gearbox Single-speed reduction gear; Kerb weight 1624kg; Top speed 93mph (limited); 0-60mph 6.5sec; Range 238 miles (EPA); CO2/tax band 0g/km, 7%; Rivals BMW i3, Nissan Leaf

Join the debate

Comments
37

18 November 2016
GM is stupid, at least in America, for not designing ALL its vehicles in both LHD/RHD form - AND - still wonders why Brits don't buy Cadillacs or Corvettes!

18 November 2016
"That’s a huge shame for British buyers who have been waiting for an electric car that can beat the meagre range of existing offerings."

How can you possibly ignore the Renault Zoe in this article? It's both cheaper and has more range. A very odd, if not suspicious omission.

bol

18 November 2016
legohead wrote:

"That’s a huge shame for British buyers who have been waiting for an electric car that can beat the meagre range of existing offerings."

How can you possibly ignore the Renault Zoe in this article? It's both cheaper and has more range. A very odd, if not suspicious omission.

No it hasn't and got more range and no it isn't suspicious.

GM/Vauxhall's decision not to sell it here is probably one of their most stupid of all (and boy have they made some poor choices over the years). Market there for the taking. Fools.

18 November 2016
Apologies, you are quite right Bol, I misread how the range was calculated! Daft not bringing it to the UK.

18 November 2016
upto I saw the check of $8316 , I have faith that my cousin had been actually taking home money part-time on-line. . there neighbour started doing this 4 less than seventeen months and just now took care of the debts on their home and bourt a brand new Peugeot 205 GTi . website link <<<<< >>>>> www.Webpay5.com

18 November 2016
I was liking it a lot until I saw the last picture, did you ever see a more diabolical boot access? Its very cheap so how about another version for say £4000 more with the smallest most efficient extender engine they can squeeze in, as long as it keeps it moving (even with reduced performance would be fine) It probably wouldn't even need it except in odd rare circumstances but it would remove any anxiety and persuade more people to switch.

18 November 2016
The Apprentice wrote:

I was liking it a lot until I saw the last picture, did you ever see a more diabolical boot access?

The Evoque convertible

18 November 2016
Citytiger wrote:
The Apprentice wrote:

I was liking it a lot until I saw the last picture, did you ever see a more diabolical boot access?

The Evoque convertible

Tesla Model 3

20 November 2016
ᴍʏ Fʀɪᴇɴᴅ's ᴍᴏᴍ ᴍᴀᴋᴇs $75 ʜᴏᴜʀʟʏ ᴏɴ ᴛʜᴇ ᴄᴏᴍᴘᴜᴛᴇʀ using his Facebook Account.. Sʜᴇ ʜᴀs ʙᴇᴇɴ ᴏᴜᴛ ᴏғ ᴀ ᴊᴏʙ ғᴏʀ 7 ᴍᴏɴᴛʜs ʙᴜᴛ ʟᴀsᴛ ᴍᴏɴᴛʜ ʜᴇʀ ᴄʜᴇᴄᴋ ᴡᴀs $20964 ᴊᴜsᴛ ᴡᴏʀᴋɪɴɢ ᴏɴ ᴛʜᴇ ᴄᴏᴍᴘᴜᴛᴇʀ ғᴏʀ ᴀ ғᴇᴡ ʜᴏᴜʀs

ᴄʜᴇᴄᴋ ᴍʏ sᴏᴜʀᴄᴇ ➤➤➤➤➤ www.NoteNet10.Tk

18 November 2016
The car was probably conceived and styled just as the suv class was about to go ballistic which is a kinda shame, just imagine how much easier it would have been to sell with an SUV body. Still nice effort GM. EV mileage licked just need to slow it down, lol.

 

Hydrogen cars just went POP

Pages

Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

  • Skoda-Karoq 2.0 TDI 4x4
    First Drive
    16 October 2017
    Diesel version of Skoda’s junior SUV is unobtrusive and undemanding, but we’d still go for the silkier petrol version of the Karoq
  • Audi Q7 e-tron
    First Drive
    16 October 2017
    Expensive and flawed but this understated diesel-electric Audi Q7 has a lot to offer
  • Citroën C3
    First Drive
    16 October 2017
    Is the third gen Citroën C3 ‘fresh and different’ enough to take on its supermini rivals? We spend six months with one to find out
  • BMW X3
    First Drive
    15 October 2017
    A satisfying rework of the X3 that usefully improves its handling, cabin finish, space and connectivity to make this BMW a class front-runner again
  • Vauxhall Insignia Country Tourer
    First Drive
    13 October 2017
    Off-road estate is now bigger, more spacious and available with torque-vectoring all-wheel drive, but is it enough to make its German rivals anxious?