Currently reading: What's the difference between regular and super unleaded fuel?
You might think pricier petrol liberates some extra horsepower from your car's engine - we explain when that's not the case
3 mins read
13 August 2020

When you pull into your local filling station, chances are there will be two types of petrol on offer: the cheaper premium grade and pricier super unleaded. So what’s your poison? Go for the super just because it sounds like a good idea, or be thrifty and stick with the premium? 

The most significant difference between the two is the research octane number (RON) of the petrol. The octane rating tells you how resistant the fuel is to detonation, known as knocking or pinking. In a petrol engine, petrol is mixed with air, then it’s compressed and ignited by a spark. When that happens, the mixture burns outwards from the point of ignition like a grassland fire (but faster). The burn should be smooth and controlled, but if the mixture is compressed too much, random pockets of the mixture spontaneously detonate too early. It’s audible and can make a sound like dried lentils being poured into a tin can, or a diesel-like knocking noise. 

A key way of increasing a petrol engine’s performance is by raising the compression ratio, or in a turbocharged engine increasing the boost – or both. Either one increases pressure inside the combustion chamber when the fuel ignites. In older engines, the threshold at which detonation became a threat had to be carefully managed by engine designers and tuners, especially when turbos came along. Then back in 1982, Saab’s engine genius, Per Gillibrand (known as ‘Mr Turbo’), dreamed up Automatic Performance Control. APC listened for the onset of knock by using a microphone attached to the cylinder block – a knock sensor – and monitoring boost pressure and engine revs. 

Today petrol engines use similar anti-knock systems, but thanks to much faster processors in engine computers they can also use algorithms to predict when knock will occur. Naturally aspirated engines delay the point at which combustion is triggered (retarding the ignition) if knock threatens, all of which brings us back to the question of whether you need to fork out the extra dosh for super unleaded.

The answer is, there’s only one real reason to and that is because your car has a high-performance engine or the handbook explicitly says you should use it. Using fuel of a higher octane than your engine needs or can benefit from won’t hurt it, only your wallet.

The difference between premium and super unleaded at the UK forecourt these days is a maximum of two points (97 octane versus 99) and the chance of a modern engine being damaged by the lower of the two is nil. However, the engineers calibrating higher-performance engines and chasing the best performance numbers are likely to have done so using the highest-octane pump fuel available. 

The higher octane allows the engine to use a higher boost pressure and more aggressive settings to pump out a little more power. With the lower octane, it may back off those settings a tad to stay below the knock threshold. Whether you can notice the difference subjectively, though, is down to how attuned you are to your car. 


Find an Autocar review

Read our review

Car review
Ford Puma 2020 road test review - hero front

Ford aims to take the crossover class by storm as it revives the Puma name

Back to top

Worst case scenario

Extreme cases of detonation can badly damage an engine. This cylinder head from a very highly tuned competition engine looks like it has been nibbled by rats. Rest easy, though, because there’s no chance of anything like this happening to a production car by choosing premium petrol over super unleaded at your local garage. 

Read more

Throwback Thursday 1989: the switchover to unleaded petrol​

16 different fuels that could power your car​

How to look after your turbocharged car​

Join the debate


12 August 2019

Reseach Octane Rating clearly doesn't translate as RON as suggested in the very first paragraph of explanation. The N as most will guess, represents Number. There are too many of these obvious technical and writing errors.


13 August 2020

Years back I ran my Subaru on Optimax and later V-Power. Then my BMW 330i. You could feel the difference more in the Subaru than the BMW, but for 7% extra cost I got 10% extra MPG.   It was worth paying a bit extra.


Then I noticed that I wasn't getting the same MPG nor extra performance. It felt that I'd put orindary fuel in by mistake. Refilled again with V-Power but still the same.


I wrote to Shell because the difference was so stark. They explained that it was because they had to now add bio-fuel.


Tesco-99 is supposed to be high in bio-fuel but it doesn't feel any different to ordinary fuel either. BP never did feel any different nor from my own experience give an increase in MPG either.


It seems that bio-fuel is so useless that you might as well have added water!


12 August 2019

BP push Super by claiming "up to 21 extra miles per tank". My car will do about 400 miles on a tank, so the benefit of Super is 5% at best. BUT the price is 10% higher!

12 August 2019

Congratulations on being one of the few journalists to appreciate and write about the benefits of superunleaded fuel. In my view this fuel has been deliberately missold by companies like Shell for around 20 years, falesely implying benefits (and in particular improved fuel consumption) for its use in all engines. This article is one of the few that correctly states that its use should be confined to high performance engines capable of exploiting its benefits.  

12 August 2019

 I used to use super years ago, I saw only a One Mile Gallon increase, so at best I was saving half a Gallon per Tank, so yes, about and extra 20 miles, so, went back to the cheaper stuff, money saved paid for other life style stuff.

12 August 2019

I thought standard unleaded was 95 RON, not the 97 stated here.

12 August 2019

Tested many times comparing full tanks on similar journeys and I get 2-3 mpg more from high octane in a tsi engined Yeti. Extra 30 miles for about £3.50 depending on the brand. It's not really here or there but the car runs well on it so I use it for that car.

12 August 2019
A very poorly researched article.

Firstly, regular fuel in the UK is 85 RON not 97 RON.

To get that wrong exposes a complete lack of subject knowledge.

Secondly, the article makes no mention whatsoever of the other benefits so clearly stated by the producers - in particular the cleaning and preservation qualities.

BP converted a V6 to run one half on regular and one half Ultimate for a lifetime. Exposed for viewing afterwards, the difference is remarkable.

12 August 2019
eseaton wrote:

A very poorly researched article. Firstly, regular fuel in the UK is 85 RON not 97 RON. To get that wrong exposes a complete lack of subject knowledge.

At least Autocar were only 2RON out, you're out by 10RON !  A gigantic lack of subject knowledge? 

13 August 2019
Typo. Silly me.


Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review