Currently reading: New versus used: Nissan Qashqai or Range Rover Evoque
Our crossover class king takes on the diminutive but mighty Range Rover Evoque
Richard Webber
5 mins read
21 September 2014

This pairing occupies a very specific space. It’s that almond-shaped sliver in the Venn diagram where Nissan’s plaudit-winning family crossover meets Land Rover’s plush, hot-cake-selling compact 4x4.

From new, even the most expensive Qashqai costs less than the cheapest five-door Range Rover Evoque, but delve into the Evoque’s back catalogue and there’s pricing parity: our long-term Qashqai 1.6 dCi Acenta Premium with pearlescent paint lists at £25,155 new, while 2012 Evoque eD4s in entry-level Pure spec can now be had from £25,750 with fewer than 20,000 miles on the clock.

Both have five doors and five seats and drive their front wheels only via a four-cylinder diesel engine and six-speed manual gearbox. 

This second-gen Qashqai is sharper-looking, more upmarket and more refined than the first. It is an impressive piece of kit – engineered for purpose with a good helping of quality to boot.

But can it really hope to mix it for style and comfort with something wearing a Range Rover badge? And can the Rangie offer the practicality and parsimony to take it to the Nissan when it comes to daily chores and household finances?

Our thoughts on how these cars look shouldn’t carry much weight, but the ways in which they fill what is essentially a common footprint – the Evoque’s extra 159mm of width is the only notable exterior discrepancy – could barely be more different.

And in such an image-conscious market, it’s hard to argue that the Evoque’s arresting aesthetic isn’t a major reason why it’s the fastest-selling used car in the UK. Sure, this new Qashqai looks bolder than the über-conservative original, but beside the Evoque, it seems more than a little plain.

That theme continues inside. The Qashqai’s cabin is hard to fault for ergonomics, comfort and solidity, but its aesthetic anonymity means you’d struggle to pick it out in a line-up if you stuck gaffer tape over the steering wheel boss. Meanwhile, the Evoque serves up new levels of design and luxury.

There’s high-quality leather on the seats, dashboard and grab handles, and the cabin’s smart, geometric shapes contrast with the Qashqai’s faddier, swoopy lines.

Dinginess is a complaint that you could level against both interiors, and that sensation is heightened in the Evoque, with its smaller glass area.

Read the full Range Rover Evoque review

However, although the Range Rover’s squashed-sandwich profile means that there’s not much light in the back, it does allow for a decent amount of space – a six-footer can happily sit behind another with enough room above and in front, although the Qashqai offers a fair bit more legroom despite its fractionally shorter wheelbase.

The rear seats split and fold in both, boosting load space from 430 to 1585 litres in the Qashqai and from 575 to 1445 litres in the Evoque.

The Nissan’s space is more uniform and easier to access, and its two movable boot panels add flexibility, including the option to make an entirely flat floor with the seats folded, which the Range Rover can’t quite manage.

Litreage at the other end is less closely matched, but the Qashqai’s 1.6 makes a respectable 128bhp against the Evoque’s 148bhp 2.2, and the Nissan is actually quicker, taking 9.9sec to reach 62mph instead of the Evoque’s 11.2sec. In reality, both are nippy around town.


Find an Autocar review

Read our review

Car review
Nissan Qashqai road test review hero front

Nissan's second crossover album goes platinum, but a light refresh and some added extras have to hold off the Qashqai from the Seat Ateca and Skoda Kodiaq

Back to top

It’s only on the motorway that the Evoque’s extra 90kg and bulkier form start to tell, with the granular but well mannered engine straining when goaded while the Qashqai’s smoother unit springs on. Both exhibit turbo lag but pull comfortably from below 2000rpm and simmer down nicely in sixth.

Read the full Nissan Qashqai review

Shifting gear is far more rewarding in the Range Rover. Its stubby lever’s short throw is enjoyably compact and stocky whereas the Nissan’s longer action feels looser. So it is with the steering, the Evoque’s helm feeling much weightier than the Qashqai’s, even when the Nissan is in Sport mode. 

Both set-ups are nicely progressive, though. Spirit these cars down a twisty road and the British-built Japanese offering yields the more car-like experience, containing roll and resisting dive better than Gaydon’s finest, but the Evoque’s greater track and wider tyres lend it higher limits of grip.

The flipside is that the Evoque has the comfier ride in all situations, smothering scars and ridges with a stately lope, and with only a slight tendency to fidget on the motorway to threaten the peace. The Qashqai’s ride niggles that bit more, most obviously in town, and, in sum, it feels tauter but less settled.

The verdict

The Nissan boasts more gizmos. Items such as sat-nav, traffic sign recognition, auto low-beam, lane departure warning, front and rear parking sensors (the standard Evoque gets rears only), panoramic roof and rear privacy glass are all included here but cost extra on the Range Rover.

Typically, the Evoque counters with luxury and style: leather, 18-inch alloy wheels and an 11-speaker audio system are standard fit. Those hungry for kit could defer to a higher-mileage Evoque equipped with the Tech pack and stay in the same price range. The pack cost £1900 from new and includes sat-nav, front parking sensors and rain-sensing wipers.

Official figures say that the Evoque will cost about 12 per cent more in fuel, and its higher emissions attract £130 in annual road tax to the Qashqai’s £30. Nissan London West charges £159 and £249 for the Qashqai’s alternating minor and major annual services.

Lookers Land Rover in Battersea, London, asks £392 and £515 for the Evoque, but that drops to £325 and £429 for cars more than three years old.

If you can stand those extra running costs, the Evoque is the clear winner. It’s a mite less practical and has less safety kit, but you’d never call it impractical or unsafe, and the luxury and comfort that it ladles on put it well beyond the Nissan’s reach.

Read Autocar's previous new versus used: Aston Martin V12 Vantage S or McLaren MP4-12C

Nissan Qashqai 1.6 dCi Acenta Premium

Price £25,155; 0-62mph 9.9sec; Top speed 118mph; Economy 64.2mpg; CO2 115g/km; Kerb weight 1535kg; Engine 4 cyls, 1598cc, turbodiesel; Power 128bhp at 4000rpm; Torque 236lb ft at 1750rpm; Gearbox 6-speed manual

Back to top

Range Rover Evoque eD4

Price £25,750 (price new: £27,995); 0-62mph 11.2sec; Top speed 112mph; Economy 56.5mpg; CO2 133g/km; Kerb weight 1625kg; Engine 4 cyls, 2179cc, turbodiesel; Power 148bhp at 4000rpm; Torque 280lb ft at 1750rpm; Gearbox 6-speed manual

Get the latest car news, reviews and galleries from Autocar direct to your inbox every week. Enter your email address below:

Join the debate


21 September 2014
So, as well as probably being more reliable, which you fail to mention, the Nissan is quicker; more economical; cheaper to service; cheaper to tax; less dingy inside; roomier in the back; has a smoother engine on the motorway; rolls and dives less on the twisties; can fold it's rear seats flat to offer a larger load area, and has more safety kit. And the Evoque is the 'clear' winner?
On looks, ride and gearchange - yes. But the conclusion to this comparison should surely be an honourable draw....

21 September 2014
The whole review was Nissan is better at this, this, this, this, then out of nowhere, RR is the "clear" winner. Pointless

22 September 2014
Cobnapint wrote:

So, as well as probably being more reliable, which you fail to mention, the Nissan is quicker; more economical; cheaper to service; cheaper to tax; less dingy inside; roomier in the back; has a smoother engine on the motorway; rolls and dives less on the twisties; can fold it's rear seats flat to offer a larger load area, and has more safety kit. And the Evoque is the 'clear' winner?
On looks, ride and gearchange - yes. But the conclusion to this comparison should surely be an honourable draw....

This. The article reads like the writer was desperately trying to make a case for the Evoque.


21 September 2014
Wow, what dummies. The QQ should be available for 10 to 20% less than list; possibly you'd be able to negotiate down on the RRE second hand price too though. Hate to think what the difference in long term maintenance costs will be though...

21 September 2014
win the comparison, but its also as much to do with the badge on the bonnet as it is driving pleasure, economy or reliability, for a fair proportion of the car buying public, they would rather have the Evoque on their drive than the QQ, the same reason some prefer a bog standard 318D to a decent spec Mondeo, its an image thing. The other problem is £25k will get you a very nice spec nearly new XC60, which is better than both of these.

21 September 2014
The Evoque is a nice car and there is no denying its strong image, but it's certainly not the clear winner. In particularly the engine is very poor - the car only weighs 90kg more than the Qashqai, yet is much slower, much thirstier and much dirtier than the less powerful Nissan. I also don't know how Land Rover can justify the servicing costs when the engine is a ubiquitous PSA unit. Just reminds me of the Harry Enfield 'I saw you coming' sketch.

21 September 2014
I do believe both of these vehicles deserve to be winners, they both offer something similar but deliver in a different way in line with the culture of their respective companies. What is slightly off putting for me about the Evoque is the way it was marketed and sold as the love child of pouty faced Beckham, leading some misguided souls to believe she may have had some kind of input into the design, perhaps some bought this expecting to find a pair of her nickers in the glove compartment or whatever.

21 September 2014
The article lists the price for a 2 year old Evoque at £25,750 and a new one at £27,995.

Who in their right mind would pay £25,750 for a two year old car if a new one is only £2245 more?

Or has Autocar once again failed to proof read their own articles? It's laughable really. I only read the website because it's free - I haven't bought the paper magazine since 2009.

The reviews are completely worthless to me, I don't trust them at all.

21 September 2014
The front wheel drive only ed4 evoque is not the car to buy hardly anyone buys one the majority go for the 4 wheel drive mainly auto, far better car and much quicker on acceleration 0 to 60 in 8.4 seconds .it will hold on to its value far better as well and feel like a luxury car instead of a tin box like the Nissan.

21 September 2014
Another plus that the Autoexpress could have mentioned in the Evoque's favour, is its impressive residuals. Recently a cousin was looking to buy one used but ended up settling on a BMW! I'm not a big fan but the car catches the eye. For majority perhaps however the Nissan Qashqai makes a lot of sense.


Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review