Haas F1 team principal: Formula 1 should keep turbocharged V6s

Guenther Steiner says sticking with current hybrid drivetrains is essential to prevent spiraling costs; a development freeze was last used with V8s
Sam Sheehan
7 April 2017

Haas F1 team principal Guenther Steiner wants Formula 1 to retain its current turbocharged V6 hybrid powertrains, despite pressure for the sport to switch to louder units.

Speaking to Autocar ahead of this weekend’s Chinese Grand Prix, Steiner said sticking with the powerplants makes financial sense because developing a new drivetrain would be extremely expensive.

“We have very advanced technology at the moment which cost a lot to develop, but if we froze development now it wouldn’t be very expensive,” he said. “It doesn’t matter how cheap a new engine is, the biggest cost is the research and development phase.”

FIA president Jean Todt recently held an F1 engine summit in Paris, where teams and manufacturers discussed what direction to take with powerplants when the sport’s current engine period ends in 2020. The general consensus of the meeting was that change was needed to address the noise and drivetrain complexity issues of the current V6s.

Our Verdict

Ferrari F12tdf

Ferrari F12tdf

Because the F12's 730bhp wasn't enough: Ferrari's limited-run F12tdf comes with more power, less weight and a radical rear-wheel steer system

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

2017 Australian GP - six things we learned

However, Steiner, whose team runs Ferrari 061 engines, believes F1 would be wiser to freeze development when the V6 engines become more equal, rather than ditching them altogether. He said: “I still think we should keep this engine, which is, technology-wise, a piece of art. We could use this one a bit longer and freeze development, like they did with the V8s.”

Before the introduction of turbocharged V6 hybrid powerplants in 2014, F1 cars were powered by 2.4-litre V8s, with development frozen to save costs. It’s estimated that the latest V6 hybrids cost each team £18 million a year to run, around twice as much as the V8s.

Along with their high development and running costs, the current powerplants have faced much criticism due to their quieter and lower sound.

McLaren-Honda's F1 troubles are bad for everyone

Ferrari F2013 will be its last F1 car to go on sale

Join the debate

Comments
3

Straff

7 April 2017
Why not have a single engine manufacturer instead?Let the races be fought out with the chassis design and the drivers? Building the powerplant always seems to be the sticking point with F1 and this would dramatically reduce costs. I wonder if BRM could build a few V16's... ;-)

xxxx

7 April 2017
"single engine manufacturer instead" :- Ferrari dump their engines and run around with one from say Cosworth, never gonna happen.

Stick with the Turbo along with the majority of modern cars

typos1 - Just can’t respect opinion

Straff

7 April 2017
Ah, so the noise does nothing for you, then? It's a massive thing for me, unfortunately. F1 is supposed to be the pinnacle of motor racing with the fastest and most spectacular cars and drivers. Give them 1500 bhp like the early 80's and the turbo's would be popular but not the yawn fest it is nowadays.

Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week