F1 2015 preview by Martin Brundle

Brundle can’t wait for the new season to start, despite the fact that it now runs to 20 races and leaves little respite. The eternal appeal, he says, is that there are always fresh questions to be answered.

We settle down in the foyer of his London pad to discuss some – starting with the prospects of the British driver who doesn’t need a surname. Will this be Jenson’s last year?

“I wouldn’t say so,” says Brundle, “although it could be if things don’t go well. He’s still a very good racing driver, which he proved again in 2014. Talking to his gang and watching his body language, there seemed a real chance he would leave – and then he didn’t. But after what’s happened, I’m giving up forecasts. For instance, I’d never have said Fernando Alonso would work for Ron Dennis again…”

This raises another discussion point: can McLaren-Honda succeed in 2015? The heritage
is with them, surely. And Alonso has the 
necessary skills, even though he’ll miss the first race due to the after-effects of a testing crash.

“Giving your car a famous name doesn’t 
make it fast,” says Brundle. “McLaren’s chassis wasn’t great last year, so they’ve got to improve that. And Honda has a lot of catching up to do. They’ve had a nightmare so far. You’d have to 
back them to get it right, although estimating the ramp-up is tough. But I still wouldn’t be surprised to see a McLaren-Honda threatening the podium this year.”

What about Alonso at McLaren? Brundle won’t place a bet on that. “He’s an extraordinary driver, but he’s also a difficult character. Look how he’s departed from teams. He’s often engineered his own difficulties. In a way, you’ve got to feel sorry for him, though. He should have won the championship that first time at McLaren. And there were two near-misses at Ferrari.

“But sooner or later, a driver has to take responsibility for what happens. You can’t keep saying they’ve given you a bad car. Look at Schumacher: he motivated the talented group around him, and together they delivered all 
those championships. He even had a flat inside Fiorano so he could work longer days.”

Do any of the current crop work as hard as Schuey did, I wonder. “Probably not,” says Brundle, after several seconds. “Mind you, everyone works hard. [Nico] Rosberg is pretty well plugged in at Mercedes, and I’ll bet you Valtteri Bottas is in the factory most days. But what Michael did was special. He knew the wives’ and kids’ names. He appreciated how much F1 mechanics give up to go racing. Yet he managed not to get too close. In the end, it’s victories you want, not 600 new friends.”

We move to the Sebastian Vettel question, with all its confusions. How did Daniel Ricciardo, a relative newcomer, come to beat the four-time champ all season? Does that mean Vettel’s 2010-2013 successes weren’t as good as we thought?

“In 18 years of commentating,” says Brundle, “the person who confuses me most is Sebastian Vettel. He just can’t seem to handle the new F1 cars. It’s not that he’s a poor driver. On Fridays before races, I always stand beside the track, and in his four championship years I know what I saw and it was extraordinary. I could close my eyes as the car went through a corner and know it was Vettel.

In the era of blown diffusers and massive downforce, he carried speed into corners brilliantly. “But he has different tools now. And he’s been a bit like a spoiled child about it. He started moaning early last year and he’s still doing it, which is disappointing. The rules are the same for everyone – and it’s not such a bad job, is it?”

Brundle reckons disaffection with the rules led Vettel to change to Ferrari. “He wasn’t enjoying the car and reckoned the Renault engine might have difficulties for another year. Along came Daniel Ricciardo with his let’s-push-the-throttle-and-see-what-happens mindset and well and truly kicked Seb’s backside. Vettel didn’t have an 
answer, so he took the Ferrari opportunity. 
Another bad season and his value would have 
gone down further.”

Next we consider Hamilton and Rosberg, so nearly equal in 2014. Will Lewis’s victory affect the closeness of the competition? Brundle is sure it will. “I believe Nico will find it harder this year,” he says. “He held the championship in the palm of his hand, then lost it. He’ll reflect on that. What’s more, he never passed Lewis and made it stick all season.

“The body language also tells you plenty. At one race this year, the drivers were taken around the circuit in old cars. When Nico came out, there was a bit of a kerfuffle. Then Lewis appeared and there was a massive roar. Nico can’t have missed the difference. I know what that feels like. At Benetton in ’92, I’d just beaten Schumacher in qualifying, but back at the motorhome I had to push my way through journalists waiting to see my German team-mate. That sort of thing does your head in. Hamilton will know he has to be at the top of his game to beat Rosberg. But if he is, he will.”

Brundle’s love affair with F1 certainly doesn’t mean he’s uncritical. Willingness to state his concerns about the sport is another reason why the audience identifies with him. He wishes Bernie Ecclestone would step back and be more presidential, because the leadership job is now too big for one man. He’s worried about the cost of competing, because it prevents the emergence of new teams. 

He’d like to see F1’s earnings better distributed, because the present 20-car field (half are paid drives) means far fewer opportunities for fledgling drivers than in his day. In 1989, he points out, there were 38 cars on the grid. And he wishes technology would go faster in some areas. Why, for instance, do F1 cars still run 13in wheels?

However, on the big technical question, today’s hybrid powertrains, Brundle is broadly positive. “We’ve allowed costs to run away and we’ve made the engines too quiet, but I still think we were right to do it. The cars would otherwise have become dinosaurs.

"Honda wouldn’t have come in. Renault would have left. Mercedes would have no one to race and would leave. We’d be back to Ferrari racing a bunch of Cosworths and Judds. Some people reckon those were the golden days, but they’re quite wrong. For four years, we’ve had the most exciting races ever. Let’s have more of the same.”