A one-off crash test between a 2016 Nissan Versa from the USA, and a 2015 Nissan Tsuru from Mexico has demonstrated the gulf in safety standards
1 November 2016

A car-to-car crash test has demonstrated the huge gulf in automotive safety standards between different countries.

The test between entry-level compact saloons from Mexico and the US resulted in catastrophic damage to the Mexican car, while the American equivalent performed well.

The event in Virginia was organised by road safety organisation Global New Car Assessment Program (NCAP), along with Latin NCAP and the US Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, and involved a 2016 Nissan Versa from the USA, and a 2015 Nissan Tsuru from Mexico.

The day before the test, Nissan announced that it would stop producing the Tsuru from May next year. The Tsuru is based on a design from 1992 and was involved in more than 4000 deaths between 2007 and 2012. A previous Latin NCAP test awarded it no stars, and this latest test showed why.

After the head-on crash test, with a 50% overlap and combined closing speed of 80mph, readings from the cars’ crash test dummies showed that the Tsuru driver would likely have been killed. The driver of the five-star rated Versa – which unlike the Tsuru was fitted with standard airbags – would have suffered relatively minor injuries.

David Ward, secretary general of Global NCAP, said he hoped the test would put more pressure on manufacturers to voluntarily improve the safety of cars globally, and not wait for regulation in each country.

“It’s probably the worst result I’ve ever seen in a crash test,” he said. “The main head injury readings off the dummy in the Tsuru were completely off the scale, and in the lower leg areas. In the Versa there would have been light knee injuries and that’s all.”

Nissan were not involved in the supply of vehicles or in the test itself. Ward stressed that the event was not singling out Nissan in particular, and that similar gulfs in safety standards were found around the world from a range of manufacturers.

“Nissan have been very keen to stress the improvements that they’re making in some of their vehicles. They’ve never tried to defend the Tsuru and have acknowledged that it’s very old. They’ve been well aware of the criticism about the vehicle.

“One of the cars did really well. The Versa a very affordable car and they deserve a big pat on the back for that. It proves the point that vehicle regulations and consumer information are very powerful and successful instruments.”

The crash, hosted at the IIHS headquarters, took place in front of automotive safety industry members as well as representatives of major corporate fleets. With large corporations representing a substantial proportion of new car customers, Global NCAP is actively urging fleets to purchase only four and five star-rated vehicles.

“There’s something very visceral about a car-to-car crash test, it’s so much more like real life than crashing into a barrier,” Ward said. “You get this enormous bang and then silence. The silence is partly the audience sitting there rather stunned. It’s sobering and thought provoking.”

Ward renewed calls for manufacturers to take their own action, and also to work together and commit to improving global safety standards.

“We think all car manufacturers should be actively seeking to cease producing zero star cars in any market in the world,” he said. “Renault has just launched a Kwid [a compact SUV] in India that doesn’t have airbags as standard and has tested at zero stars. We’re lost for words at why manufacturers are not applying things that they’ve been doing for 20 years in Europe and North America. They say that they’re complying with the laws in that market, but that’s not good enough. They all know how to do this, and while there may be extra cost to fit airbags, they should tell the governments to give fiscal incentives. Governments respond to their lobbying and in other countries that’s been done.”

The United Nations launched the Decade of Action campaign in 2011, supported by 100 countries, to reduce road deaths around the world. Ward said more needs to be done to meet the campaign’s goals by its conclusion in 2020.

“The industry needs to step up to the challenge, to take global initiative and agree collectively that they should be producing vehicles that meet the most basic minimum UN crash standards,” he said. “Back in 2006 the industry agreed a global commitment that all passenger cars would have seatbelts and they did that in response to UN initiative around road safety. Since the UN’s Decade of Action started in 2011, nothing has happened. There hasn’t been any joint initiative by car manufacturers to do anything like that.”

Phill Tromans

Our Verdict

Ford Fiesta
Fiestas sold in Europe are ostensibly the same as those sold in America and Asia

The seventh-generation Ford Fiesta is the UK's best selling car, helped by frugal engines, handling verve and a big car feel

Join the debate

Comments
5

1 November 2016
Or are we being softened up in the west before being made to pay more for our cars so that cheaper versions in poorer countries can be sold at prices the locals can afford but with enhanced equipment?

1 November 2016
Hardly. The Tsura is a distant ancestor of the Versa, designed forty years ago and long since obsolete. Of course this test would produce such disparate results (that probably flatter the Versa's performance in the test). What's much more concerning is that certain manufacturers, including Nissan, are still designing new models with inadequate standards of safety, specifically for third world and "emerging" markets. Commercially expedient, but deeply cynical.

2 November 2016
Not surprising the results. A 20yr old design v a relatively new design. I'd be interested to see the difference in a say a north American spec Focus or Golf v European spec, to see if there's any difference. Just a thought.

2 November 2016
Global NCAP said they were going to crash two versions of the same car to prove that people in Latin America were getting a raw deal. I wonder why they changed their minds and crashed an obsolete model instead...

10 December 2016
androo wrote:

Global NCAP said they were going to crash two versions of the same car to prove that people in Latin America were getting a raw deal. I wonder why they changed their minds and crashed an obsolete model instead...

Its NOT obsolete ...... Nissan say they will stop production in May 2017.

So its still on sale.

Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

  • Lexus LC500
    Car review
    20 October 2017
    Futuristic Lexus LC coupé mixes the latest technology with an old-school atmospheric V8
  • Maserati Levante S GranSport
    First Drive
    20 October 2017
    Get ready to trade in your diesels: Maserati’s luxury SUV finally gets the engine it’s always needed
  • Jaguar XF Sportbrake TDV6
    First Drive
    19 October 2017
    The handsome Jaguar XF Sportbrake exhibits all the hallmarks that makes the saloon great, and with the silky smooth diesel V6 makes it a compelling choice
  • Volkswagen T-Roc TDI
    First Drive
    19 October 2017
    Volkswagen's new compact crossover has the looks, the engineering and the build quality to be a resounding success, but not with this diesel engine
  • BMW M550i
    First Drive
    19 October 2017
    The all-paw M550i is a fast, effortless mile-muncher, but there's a reason why it won't be sold in the UK