The UK’s creaking system needs a saviour. So what would we do if handed power as the government transport minister for a day?
23 March 2019

It's hardly an enviable position, but Britain's transport minister has the power to improve commutes, reduce the rate of traffic fatalities, streamline public transport and reduce emissions. 

With our road network pockmarked by potholes, a nationwide upgrade to smart motorways causing lengthy tailbacks and a confused political position preventing a smooth shift to electrification, we ask: what would we do with the authority?

Here's what the Autocar writers would do if they were put in the hot seat for the day:

Matt Prior

Approve a massive transport infrastructure project, making the UK the easiest country in the world to travel around. Approve every bypass currently under consideration. 

Commission a new national airport, in the middle of Oxfordshire – an hour from London, an hour from Birmingham, between the M1 and M40, with a new motorway link between the two, which then heads due west into Wales and due east into East Anglia. Modify HS2 to fit it. Make a straight motorway link to the M40 from the M6, to the west of Birmingham, and then from M40 to the south coast. 


Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

Install dual carriageway into Cornwall. Make a new motorway from north Wales for Liverpool to Manchester to Leeds to near York and make the A1 a proper motorway all the way to Scotland. 

And crucially add a rail line alongside every one of these new or upgraded roads, with regular big, free car parks at stations near towns. And streamline train prices.

Andrew Frankel

If I were transport minister for the day, I would: 

Use ‘smart’ motorways to raise speed limits as well as lower them. Create cycle lanes with solid white lines over which neither cars nor bicycles can cross. Lower speed limits to 20mph in all urban residential streets and outside all schools during term time. 

Reintroduce mandatory MOTs for classic cars, but increase the scope of tax exemption for classic cars. Ban old diesels; there is no justification for keeping them on the road. Support modern diesels, offering tax breaks for RDE2-compliant cars and recognising the vital role they play in limiting tailpipe CO2 emissions. 

Invest in sustainable hydrogen infrastructure. Long term, fuel cells are the future. Use smart motorways to make lane discipline legally enforceable. Make night driving and skid control part of the driving test. 

Once the above is achieved, take the rest of the day off.

James Attwood

There’s plenty I’d love to do if I were made transport minister for a day, although my grand plans (actually fixing all those potholes, for example) would likely drain the department’s annual budget in 24 hours, making life tough for the poor sod who has to spend the following 364 days picking up the pieces. 

So I’ll stick to introducing a simple, relatively cheap-to-implement policy: greater enforcement of driving standards. Let’s get the police to spend less time monitoring speeding, and more time actually making the roads safe by clamping down on dangerous, inconsiderate and selfish road users. 

Drivers jumping lights, cutting in at junctions, changing lanes erratically, blocking junctions and so on make Britain’s roads seem even more crowded than they really are, in turn making driving more stressful and less enjoyable. 

That should make a difference. Now, while nobody’s looking I’ll quickly sign off those pothole repairs and a big investment in electric car charging points…

Jim Holder

I’d pick up the phone and call Matthew Avery at Thatcham Research, and download his every thought on how to integrate assisted driving and automated driving cars onto our roads in a safe and sensible manner that balances the desire for tech leadership against one of safety and common sense. 

Avery has long been a leading voice on anything related to automotive and safety, and has the rare distinction of being both a technical expert and able to communicate in a way that even the least technically knowledgeable can understand. Encouragingly, he’s also strident in his belief that there is no grey area between the two sides of assistance (when drivers still need to be alert) and autonomy (when they do not) and he has a view of how to make that transition work (as well as a refusal to countenance any muddling of the two). 

The path to autonomy will dominate the motoring agenda once the electrification debate has settled and is fraught with complication – but here is the man who can make sense of it for everyone.

Rachel Burgess

First order of business would be a review into the effectiveness of smart motorways. Too often I see tailbacks caused by over-cautious drivers slamming on the brakes as soon as a 40mph sign flashes up on the gantries. And if they’re supposed to be stopping jams on the motorway, I’m not sure they’re working… 

Second, I’d take a close look into taxation and grants. No more punishments for clean Euro 6 diesels, and more generous incentives for plug-in hybrids (especially in light of the recent Ultra Low Emission Vehicle grant debacle). 

If we’re looking to raise money, why not introduce higher rates for cars over £100,000, £150,000, £200,000 and so on? I think reinstating MOT tests for pre-1971 classic cars would be a sensible choice, too. 

Last but not least, for those times when you’re stuck in stationary traffic for hours, I’d introduce retractable vending machines between lanes. Joking. Sort of.

Mark Tisshaw

Transport minister? That’s a job for a career politician on their way up the food chain with a long-term eye on Number 10. I mean, none of them really care about motorists, do they? But there’s a chance to win populist appeal here, so here’s what I’d do. 

What’s the biggest problem with our roads day-to-day? Volume of rush-hour traffic. So let’s get radical: convince the treasury and Number 10 to introduce a four-day working week, phased in different postcodes of the same area to have different days off to help alleviate traffic. 

Let’s take the Reading postcode area of Berkshire where I live. There are 35 different RG postcodes, so seven random ones have Monday off, same for Tuesday, and repeat to the end of the week. The result? Reduced traffic levels, even with people going to other areas, as the ‘postcode lottery’ is played out across the UK. Or total confusion and years of delays to the point where it gets scrapped. 

The perfect political idea, then. 

Lawrence Allan

If I were transport minister for the day, I would stop the roll-out of ‘smart’ motorways until a thorough and independent investigation into safety concerns can be completed. In particular, the system that decides when and where to reduce speed limits needs a radical rethink, as many are so fed up with seeing the limits fluctuate randomly for mile after mile they simply ignore them, creating massive speed variation between lanes. 

The huge amount of money saved from halting smart motorway implementation could, in the short term at least, be used to increase the number of traffic police on our roads. Highways Agency staff should be given the ability to quickly report poor driving, with a focus on policing driving standards rather than just collecting speeding fines. Attentive, aware drivers doing 80mph clearly pose less of a risk on motorways than the vast amount of drivers who think texting at the wheel is acceptable.

Richard Bremner

Introduce a smart road-tolling system to replace vehicle excise duty. Every vehicle would be fitted, by law, with a smart GPS tracker. 

If you think that’s invasive, well, your smartphone already knows where you are. A standard cost-per-mile rate would be levied across every UK road, and adjusted in realtime according to the vehicle’s homologated weight (taxing weight taxes road wear), emissions (CO2, NOx, particulates) and time of use (from rush hour to dead-of-night), plus the road’s maintenance needs. 

Most of the tax would be used for general government spending, as now, but a fixed proportion (20%?) would be allocated to road maintenance and build. Roads needing work would cost slightly more to use, but not so much as to encourage rat-running, to pay for repairs. Foreign haulage operators would also pay. 

The result would be the fairer allocation of road resources, as determined by the vehicle’s realtime congestion, environmental and maintenance impact. The tax on weight would encourage reduction, with obvious benefits. CO2 output would additionally continue to be taxed via fuel/electricity duty.

Hilton Holloway

I would introduce significant incentives – guaranteed not to be withdrawn for at least seven years – for the adoption of LPG and natural gas as automotive fuels. It’s a much quicker way of shifting from diesel, especially for commercial operators. 

While people struggle with the cost and difficultly of charging battery cars, we are literally standing on a country-wide gas infrastructure. The Volkswagen Group is already producing gas-powered vehicles across most of its brands that are very low on both pollution and CO2. 

Road fuel receipts would have the three cash amounts printed on them. Government fuel tax, the producer charges and retailer profit. Elsewhere, there would be three numbers on rail tickets: the ticket cost, the taxpayer subsidy for the fare and the profit per-ticket being made by private operators. It might remind people that motorists pay more than their ‘fare’ share.

Steve Cropley 

The likelihood of my becoming a politician is thankfully slight, but were I to become transport minister, I’d have the Highways Agency form an elite research group tasked with searching the roads network for unwanted anomalies that impede traffic, increasing costs and pollution. 

The group – called Free Roads Observation Group (FROG) – would comprise members chosen for driving knowledge, experience and common sense. The task would be to spot places where signage is misleading or obscured, speed limits are inappropriate, traffic-light regimes cause needless hold-ups and where daft local authority decisions have created unintended difficulties. Private citizens would be encouraged to bring their own experience to FROG’s attention via a website and phone number. 

FROG’s observations would be listened to and their recommendations discussed at implementation level. If their findings were not acted on, as transport minister I would want to know the reason why.

Read more

Do we really want more smart motorways?​

Euro 6 diesels could be banned in three European cities​

Potholes: how much they cost the UK and how they are fixed​

Join the debate


23 March 2019

Bin smart motorways, they dont work.

Bin HS2 and HS3, and instead use the money to electrify the whole rail network, starting with the east coast mainline. Hull to London being the priority. 

Ensure rail franchises offer value for money, we have some of the most expensive train tickets in the world - why when the quality of service is average at best.

Stop the stupid ability to make cheap rail travel by splitting tickets, and make direct tickets the cheapest option. 

Remove and ban all future bus lanes, unless they can physically prove they dont cause congestion. Start a nationwide cycle path building programme, get bikes off the road and onto dedicated paths wherever possible, ensure they adhere to the highway road, and make insurance, lights, helmets and high vis mandatory for all cyclists.

Get more police out on the road showing a physical presence, not just to issue tickets, but to give advice and slaps on the wrist, common sense policing.

Get rid of the highways traffic officer, and use real highway police.

Get rid of the congestion charge, its a money making scam, and give real incentives to get rid of older more polluting vehicles,  tax the most polluting off the road, its simple, reinstate taxbreaks for modern ultra low emmision diesels.

Ensure motorway services offer realistic prices, not just rip off the motorist because they can, bring in a watchdog to police them to ensure they do. 

Once we leave the EU, ask industry proffessionals what they would like to see with changes to things like driving hours regulations and training for HGV's, they are the ones doing it.

Finally raise motorway speed limits to 85, but strictly police it, its the average speed anyway, and reduce speeds in more built up areas to 20.  


23 March 2019

I’d bin Smart motorways and replace this with a smart drivers programme: essentially, signs on the motorway saying KEEP LEFT and KEEP YOUR DISTANCE, and increased police patrols to fine and ban drivers who drive badly.

The existing motorway is used inefficiently because drivers hog the fast lane like morons.

23 March 2019

 Who’d be a Politician?, we all have our “ what I’d do” moments,but, the abiding thing is, where would we get the money from?, nobody in the article mentioned this or indeed how much it would cost.

23 March 2019
Peter Cavellini wrote:

 Who’d be a Politician?, we all have our “ what I’d do” moments,but, the abiding thing is, where would we get the money from?, nobody in the article mentioned this or indeed how much it would cost.

Well, they could start to be honest (eh?) by admitting that the motorist is a cash-cow (or is that a Qashqai?) and that most of our taxes go to the national health service et al rather than back to motoring related issues.

23 March 2019
Peter Cavellini wrote:

 Who’d be a Politician?, we all have our “ what I’d do” moments,but, the abiding thing is, where would we get the money from?, nobody in the article mentioned this or indeed how much it would cost.

It doesnt matter how much it would cost, the money could come from Labours magic money tree.. Diane Abbott could work out the costings but it will probably be slightly more than a dairy milk chocolate bar.. 


23 March 2019

From a safety viewpoint I really believe there should be a considerable slowdown in the process of introducing autonomous vehicles, be they cars or commercial vehicles. Computers are still too unreliable. I would far prefer to remain in control of the vehicle I am riding in. This headlong rush into the future is, I believe ill-advised. 


23 March 2019

What a shame there's such a schoolboy howler in the very first sentence of this piece. Britain/the UK doesn't have "a" transport minister..... it has 4. One for each of the 4 countries in this artificial multi-nation superstate.

There are 4 transport departments, with 4 sets of policies, and 4 sets of priorities. That may make a lot of sense in tailoring the completely different policies appropriate to the Highlands and SE England for example - but it undoubtedly leads to a lack of joined-up thinking when there are different departments running transport on each side of the Severn Bridge, or between the M6 and M74.

And it's led to utter nonsense like the Transport Department in London deciding to spend tens of Billions on a "high speed" rail line which will actually make trains to Glasgow SLOWER.... because unlike Pendelinos, HS2 trains won't tilt, so will have to travel slower on the increasingly twisty West Coast Main Line north of Preston.

23 March 2019

We're not about to spend lots of money on more roads, even if we wanted to. I think its about using the space we have more efficently. People will in future years question that everyone started and finished work at the same time and the roads were jammed for those specific times of day but not so bad otherwise - why did you do this? 

1. Allow overtaking on both sides on the M-way. More evenly distribute traffic across lanes. Get around those middle laners more easily.

2. MINIMUM speed limit for cars on an M-way of 60mph. A lorry should NEVER have to overtake a car on the M-way.

3. Not a hater of smart M-ways - i think they work if managed properly - but i like the idea of higher limits when empty. 

4. Otherwise, bin HS2. As someone said somewhere, its a Victorian answer to a modern problem. By the time its finished autonomous cars will exist to some extent. I'm not against trains but don't build a new line that connects existing centres for another £50bn to save 15mins on a journey - ludicrous.

5. Charge people in ULEV zones who have a car that qualifies freely to enter but then is running on ICE instead of battery power. Just having the appropriate car for free entry is not enough.

23 March 2019

Some good suggestions above, here's my take:

1. Mandatory 10 year refresher courses for all drivers. Not a retest, the consequences of failure would be too high, but something to highlight those bad habits.

2. More traffic police to help improve driving standards (middle lane hogging, using a phone, not signalling - leave speeding to the cameras). Even simply using scrap's suggestion above of putting reminder messages on gantries to get people to keep left would help and could be implemented tomorrow. I've seen this done a few times but it seems to have stopped.

3. I've no problem with smart motorways but they need to be smarter. Being told to slow down miles in advance of a hazard is excessive and counter productive.

4. Much greater push towards electrification. Thinking through energy generation, infrastructure and adoption of electric vehicles.

5. Invest in better tyre and road surface technology. One of the major blights on this country is road noise. It's amazing how far the sound of a car can travel irrespective of what powers it. Perhaps VAT on tyres should be based on their width - the wider the tyre the more you pay.

6. Ditch fuel duty and impose a pay per mile system. The rate will vary depending on the time you travel and what roads you use. As Richard points out above, we are all already being tracked by our phones so there isn't really any loss of privacy.

7. Go metric. I mean its 2019, surely it's time to switch to kilometres. 


23 March 2019
Will86 wrote:

7. Go metric. I mean its 2019, surely it's time to switch to kilometres. 

Never, what will you suggest next, we switch to driving on the right as well. There is nothing wrong with miles. 


Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week