Autocar of 1942 pitches "The single seater as a type for after-war use, especially for business men"

By the 1930s, motoring was common among the middle and upper classes, and congestion was already a problem. Then private motoring came near to a grinding halt for the duration of World War II.

Here, from a 1942 edition of Autocar, a businessman pitches his plan for solving the problem of the rush hour post-war. His dream car is similar to the city cars of today, only smaller. In fact, it seems very reminiscent of today’s car of the future.

“Before the war I owned a big American car and a Standard Eight. The idea was that I should use the American car for journeys and when I travelled en famille, and the Standard for my daily trip to town. But it did not work out quite like that,” our man began. “If my wife was going out, which was most days, she would want a car herself, and, as she never really felt at home with the Yank, she always took the Standard, which, of course, left me with the big car for my 20-mile journey to my office and for the run of five miles from the office to the works.”

This car had to be short, narrow and manoeuvrable, the writer says.

“It would be a little single-seater saloon – I can’t remember ever having anyone in the Standard other than soldiers to whom I have given a lift. So I want a single-seater with just enough room to take a small case or parcels behind the driver’s seat. The advantage of the single-seater is, of course, that it would be quite narrow – about 3ft 6in, I should think. The wheelbase, too, would have to be very short and, above all, I must have a steering lock comparable with that of the London taxi.”

To give you an idea of the scale, this is just 4in wider than 1962’s comical Peel P50.

“I want to be able to park it in the smallest space that I can find, and I want to be able to emulate the cyclists and motorcyclists who worm their way in and out of the traffic waiting at traffic blocks until they are up to the lights,” our man continued.

“The engine would be about 500cc, or even 400cc, but must be large enough to give the car good acceleration, and for the sake of smoothness and comfort I should want it to be a four-cylinder model with the conventional water cooling. I want a real car that will have the refinements of the large models.”

Again, this ideal car sounds ideal for today – it’s almost a wonder this idea didn’t take off post-1945.

Fuel economy was also a concern: “With a 500cc engine I should expect at least 50mpg; by fitting an engine of 400cc the saving in cost would hardly seem worthwhile. The difference between 50mpg and 60mpg would mean about the cost of two cigarettes a day, and the saving in tax would be 25 shillings a year, so I most certainly would prefer the extra 'zip' of the 500cc engine.”

“I should consider this single-seater as an annual season ticket on the railway. It is, of course, impossible to place a figure for the cost until we see how things shape after the war and cars are in production once more; but judging by pre-war standards, I should not expect to have to pay more than £75 for the car.”

Such a price would equate to about £3187 – around £2800 cheaper than the UK’s current cheapest car, the Dacia Sandero – and a seemingly realistic expectation even today.

However, our man could see the potential downfalls:  “I am, of course, willing to admit that this type of car would not appeal to everybody,” before countering that with: “The desire which is inherent in most motorists to own something a little different from the next man would place a number on the road to start off with,” something that still rings true today.

Autocar’s hopeful businessman concluded with: “It is, of course, impossible to foretell how things in the motor trade will be in 10 years or even five years, but if they are anything like we are hoping for then I hope to see a single-seater on the road in the not too distant future, even if it is only a single-seater model of the smallest car made.”

Unfortunately, no such car has ever made the market in any significant number. However, with the industry moving at such a pace, who knows what the near future could hold?

Our Verdict

Dacia Sandero

The Sandero represents basic motoring done well, for those who really want it

Join the debate

Comments
3

6 October 2016
Not a bad idea given the number of single occupant cars I see driving around. It seems such a waste to rely on a tonne or two of metal to transport you around everywhere. And inefficient too, given that most of energy used is used to move the container rather than the occupant.
Sadly though, a single seater car wouldn't weigh a quarter of a conventional car, let alone a cost a quarter of the amount.But if these problems could be solved, I'd have one...

6 October 2016
Single-Seater vehicles would have to be a cut above the existing Motorized Quadricycles, yet be smaller and lighter then the current Kei Cars that can also be driven at minimum on a provisional motorcycle / car license.

Top speed should be electronically or mechanically limited to 70 mph as well as feature a decent size boot or luggage compartment, which can be utilized for both personal and limited commercial uses (e.g. delivery, etc).

Such a vehicle should be limited to Automatic / CVT gearboxes and could also be adapted for use by disabled drivers forming the basis of a significantly safer 4-wheeled successor to the Invacar.

In terms of powertrain would ideally like to see Single-Seater vehicles use 500-750cc engines, perhaps even hybrids akin to the Suzuki Twin followed later by alternate drivetrains.

The best of the 3-wheeled Single-Seaters should draw upon the HMV Freeway (albeit upscaled), while the best of the 4-wheeled Single-Seaters should have to draw upon the Daihatsu Midget II.

Ideally would love to see a modern Single-Seater equivalent of the FMR Tg500 or the short-lived 4-wheeled Bond Bug by the Webster Motor Company.

8 October 2016
It would have to be safer than the 'plastic pigs' that were inflicted on disabled rivers in the 70s and 80s! Doesn't the Smart come close to these parameters, and with space for 2 people?

Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

  • Citroën C3 Aircross
    First Drive
    17 October 2017
    It's got funky looks and a charming interior, but it's another small SUV, and another dynamic miss. Numb steering is just one thing keeping it from class best
  • Skoda-Karoq 2.0 TDI 4x4
    First Drive
    16 October 2017
    Diesel version of Skoda’s junior SUV is unobtrusive and undemanding, but we’d still go for the silkier petrol version of the Karoq
  • Audi Q7 e-tron
    First Drive
    16 October 2017
    Expensive and flawed but this understated diesel-electric Audi Q7 has a lot to offer
  • Citroën C3
    First Drive
    16 October 2017
    Is the third gen Citroën C3 ‘fresh and different’ enough to take on its supermini rivals? We spend six months with one to find out
  • BMW X3
    First Drive
    15 October 2017
    A satisfying rework of the X3 that usefully improves its handling, cabin finish, space and connectivity to make this BMW a class front-runner again