You’ve got to hand it to Tesla - few companies can launch a new car with such a sense of occasion and fronted by such an enigmatic figure as Elon Musk.
The Tesla boss walked out on stage in California last night to the sound of rapturous applause, with the voice of one particularly happy soul shouting “we love you Elon” to the gathered crowd of journalists and soon to be Model X owners.
Read our Tesla Model X review here
This was a different way of launching a car. Sure, we’d all seen the prototype version of the Model X in 2013, complete with its radical ‘falcon wing’ doors, but until Musk appeared on stage the technical specifications of the all-electric SUV were still a mystery, as was its final design. Usually, such features are drip-fed over months of design sketches, preview pictures and 'teaser' shots.
Interesting, too, was the presence of the six customers who had been first in line for the production-ready cars. They played their own part in the unveiling, with each invited up on stage to collect the keys to their own Model Xs.
Of course, it’s hard to ignore the context of launching a zero-emissions SUV just days after the Volkswagen emissions scandal engulfed the world’s press.
Musk laughed as he introduced the Model X’s HEPA filter, which provides “medical-grade” air to the car’s cabin, describing it as being “sort of topical”. He added: "We designed the car well before recent events. It just happens that recent events have illustrated the importance of air safety.”
Of course, we’ve yet to drive the Model X, but we’re prepared for the same revolutionary experience that came with the launch of the Model S, and the Roadster before that. In all truth, Tesla may just have reinvented the SUV.
Join the debate
Add your comment
What Bob Lutz thinks
It's true that the world may be running light on buyers who will spring for a big-dollar electric vehicle that can't make the hike from Detroit to Chicago without stopping for a long charge. And cheap gasoline isn't helping Tesla's case. Right now, prices around the country are hovering close to $2 a gallon. If that's bad news for the Prius and the Volt, it's worse for the Model S.
In addition, there's never been any secret sauce to the company's battery technology. The automakers that bought into Tesla's tech early did so to avoid having to pony up development dollars on first-generation battery packs of their own. Now that Audi has announced it's getting into the EV game, Tesla should be even more concerned. If you're a luxury buyer, which car would you rather have?
And then there's the distribution problem. Nobody has ever been successful with company stores, though plenty of manufacturers have tried them. When I came to BMW in the Seventies, it had five factory stores. The idea was, like Tesla, to be in control of the retail environment and give customers an upscale experience. They were all money pits.
I think Tesla CEO Elon Musk figured that if factory stores work for Apple, they'll work for Tesla. But the fixed costs for an Apple store are next to nothing compared with a car dealership's. Smartphones and laptops don't need anything beyond a mall storefront and a staff of kids. A car dealership is very different. It sits on multiple acres. You need a big building with service bays, chargers, and a trained sales force, plus all the necessary finance and accounting people. It ties up a staggering amount of capital, especially when you factor in inventory. Under a traditional franchise arrangement, the factory never has to carry that burden. Right now, Tesla does.
Stockholders may be clinging to the hope that the company's upcoming crossover will help put Tesla back on track, but there's little evidence to bolster that optimism. A big, expensive vehicle with a compromised structure to accommodate gullwing doors can hardly be a sales knockout.
If I were sitting in Musk's seat, I would take an urgent look at cutting cost. Not just taking cost out of the car, but reducing expense in general. When they have a situation where, on an operating basis, they're losing $4000 per car, they're in trouble. At some point, they're not going to get any more money.
I would seriously consider an entry-level model with a cheaper, range-extended hybrid driveline. Something with a much smaller battery that also looks great and drives great. Something that's electric most of the time, say 50 or 60 miles, but can carry on under gasoline power past that. Would an internal-combustion engine dilute the Tesla brand? Maybe, but everyone said Porsche could never build a front-engine car, and look how that turned out.
I like Elon Musk personally, and I think the Model S is a fabulous car, but history's filled with defunct companies with great products run by brilliant people. Unless Tesla rights its organization and products in a hurry, it'll join those ranks.
Seems like the X is a lot
sheer ignorance
Musk and his crew should be congratulated on the success of a relatively young start up company that has made every other major car company sit up and take notice with Tesla's amazing game changing cars.
I have always thought us Brits were reserved but these comments are just plain stupid and backward.
Oh and by the way concinnity Tesla make money on every car they make with quite good margins but they are ploughing money back into the supercharger network all by themselves to make sure they can continue expanding the electricity charging points for their cars.
It has to be done as all the ICE making manufacturers want to keep the status quo and see Tesla as an annoyance to be squashed so they can resume business as usual.
Leaving aside the insults
sheer ignorance indeed
Tesla and its related companies have received $5bn of state subsidies. And you have simply made that up.
I hope US taxpayers are aware of where their money is being "ploughed". Perhaps the billionaire Musk could give it all back, instead.
I'm sure you could - you seem to be brilliant at making things up.
Like I said...
they also paid back their
when will Ford GM etc pay back their aid money?