From £69,9008

Polestar gets into proper luxury SUV territory while trying to stay sporty

There’s an interesting circularity to the way premium car makers are now revisiting and reinventing their electric luxury SUVs. It’s six or seven years – or about a full model cycle – since the Jaguar I-Pace, Audi E-tron and Mercedes EQC first gave buyers premium-branded electric options for their next family-sized SUV. 

The fresh meat those same buyers are being offered today – the Porsche Macan Electric, the Audi Q6 E-tron, the refreshed BMW iX and the subject of this test – represent the way EV technology has matured over that period as much by their variety as by their generational leaps on performance, efficiency, range and charging speed.

The all-new Polestar 3 illustrates how very adeptly. Based on a model platform shared with the much larger and taller Volvo EX90, it shows that common underpinnings can spawn very different products. This five-seater luxury SUV also occupies a notional Rubicon for Polestar because it’s the largest passenger car its maker will offer for the foreseeable future.

If the firm can successfully demonstrate the sort of progressive driver appeal here that it claims as a defining characteristic of its brand, then, we can probably believe it when it says its cars will never be dull to drive.

Advertisement
Back to top

DESIGN & STYLING

8
Polestar 3 review 2025 02

The body profile of the Polestar 3 is unusual among luxury SUVs. The car measures within an inch or two of a Range Rover Sport for outright length (4900mm) and wheelbase (2985mm), but its roofline runs lower than that of an Audi Q3 (1614mm). 

That lowness wasn’t sought simply to make it stand out from the crowd. It’s because cutting out what the car’s designers considered “those wasted few inches of excess head room” also cuts down on frontal area, making the 3 more aerodynamically efficient.

The front wing that spans the leading edge of the bonnet accelerates air over the body of the car - and Polestar insists that it works to counter lift. It looks great too, especially since you don’t usually see it at first glance.

A single drive battery is offered at present: a nickel-manganese-cobalt, sandwich-style installation with 107kWh of usable capacity, made up of 204 prismatic cells and supplied by Chinese battery specialist CATL.

Buyers can choose between single- and dual-motor models, both using liquid-cooled, permanent magnet synchronous motors. The former model’s motor is carried over the rear axle and develops 295bhp, while the latter model has a 242bhp version of the same motor per axle. The Long Range Dual Motor’s total output of 483bhp and 620lb ft can be boosted with Polestar’s Performance Pack (to 510bhp and 671lb ft), which also bundles 22in forged alloy wheels and dedicated performance tuning for the suspension.

In the case of the Dual Motor, the rearmost one is fitted with a clutch-based, mechanical torque-vectoring active e-differential from Borg Warner, which serves two purposes. When the car is tuned for efficient running, the e-diff can disconnect the rear motor entirely, minimising friction and maximising range. When the car is configured for handling dynamism instead, it can vector up to 100% of rear-axle torque to either rear wheel.

Adopting the brand-new, EV-only SPA2 model platform, this car has a steel monocoque chassis attached to which are aluminium-rich axles of double wishbones at the front and multiple links at the rear. The dual-motor versions are suspended by dual-chamber active air springs and adaptive dampers. According to the engineers, the air suspension and the torque splitter are sophisticated enough that the 3 simply doesn't need the four-wheel steering and active anti-roll control of some rivals. You might say that's fortuitous, since Volvo’s platform toolkit doesn't include those technologies.

The Single Motor sticks with coil springs with frequency-selective dampers and hydraulic bump stops. And in place of the clever torque-splitting device on the rear axle, there’s now a conventional open differential. The engineers say they have tuned it to feel much like the LRDM in its default Comfort mode, with a focus on front-end grip.

INTERIOR

7
Polestar 3 review 2025 10

Expansively spacious, expensively hewn and characteristically minimalist in its layout and themes, the swish cabin of the Polestar 3 has an understated but undeniably pervasive appeal.

Polestar strongly touts its sustainability, so the cloth seats aren't simply cloth seats; they're upholstered in ‘animal welfare wool in charcoal’, which looks more like a nice black cloth than the very overtly sheepy material in some Volvos but is still a nice change from the ubiquitous leather. Real leather is available, for a spicy £5000, but then it is 'Animal welfare Nappa leather'.

The steering wheel has an array of blank buttons, whose functions flash up in the driver display when you touch them lightly. Many don’t seem to do anything, despite there being a bunch of things for which the 3 is missing buttons.

This is a determinedly 21st-century car that embraces digital tech as fulsomely as any other. It comes not with a key but, like a Tesla, a credit card-style access card without any buttons for unlocking or opening the boot remotely (which can be annoying when passengers reach the vehicle first). To unlock it, hold that key card against the door handle (or just leave it in your pocket and press the handle’s ‘keyless’ dimple), which then motors outwards towards your fingers.

Getting in is easy and will require no step up for most occupants. And, just as the designers intended, the sense of space inside isn’t diminished by any meaningful lack of head room. Sparsely featured consoles extend before you and to either side, but high material quality makes those fairly bare expanses appealing to the senses all the same.

Usefully sized glovebox and armrest storage areas make up for door bins that are slimmer and less accessible than some, with more space for bags and wallets available underneath the floating centre console.

The car’s primary and secondary controls are well located; there is both a small digital instrument screen and a large head-up display to relay key driving information right where you would want it; and the 3’s front seats are comfortable and widely adjustable, so it’s easy to feel at home at the wheel.

Adjusting the steering column, however, involves diving into the central, portrait-oriented touchscreen multimedia system and wading through a couple of menus until the slightly mysterious unmarked buttons on the steering wheel spokes are empowered as controls for the motorised column. Thus you are given a first taste of a secondary control concept that is conspicuously short on fixed physical switchgear and which relies heavily on the central screen, even for things like fog-lamp activation, mirror adjustment, intermittent wiper speed and glovebox opening (see ‘Multimedia’).

Just as Volvo did with the EX30, Polestar may claim fewer switches and secondary components make for a more sustainable interior. But that argument didn’t convince us as a good reason to make a car harder to operate 12 months ago, and still doesn’t today.

Boot space is good, however. The sloping roofline does make it a bit shallow towards the back of the car, but the 484-litre space (accessed through a usefully large hatch aperture) is decent, with a nifty boot floor that folds up to split the load space and gives you something to strap your groceries securely to (as we have seen in various Volvos). Meanwhile, the small ‘frunk’ is good for storing a single charging cable under the car's bonnet.

Multimedia - 3 stars

The 14.5in, portrait-oriented multimedia system is supposedly backed by enough networked processing power to make this car and the related Volvo EX90 among the market’s first ‘software-defined vehicles’, capable of updating and improving themselves over time. This sounds like it should make for the most sophisticated, responsive and intuitive touchscreen system of its kind, but the reality, commendable as it is in some ways, doesn’t quite live up to that billing.

The system is navigated through a row of shortcuts at the base of the screen, some of which are selected ‘intelligently’ according to the menus and functions you most commonly access. However, that means that, confusingly, the 'buttons' are never where you left them, and because there aren't nearly enough of them,  you regularly have to go three or four levels deep into the menus, looking away from the road for longer, to find things that ought to be more accessible.

The system is well rendered, its menu icons typically of a size that’s easy to hit at arm’s length, but it does suffer with moments of latency that can frustrate you, for instance, when trying to disable lane keeping on a winding road. It has good Google-based voice control but no physical cursor controller.

ENGINES & PERFORMANCE

8
Polestar 3 review 2025 23

Even though we tested it without the Performance Pack upgrades, the Polestar 3 proved itself quite fast on Horiba MIRA’s mile straights.

If you’re spending around £80,000 on a dual-motor electric SUV, you should probably expect 0-60mph in around six seconds, but this one will do it in less than five. Even when it battery’s state of charge is below 10%, it isn’t a great deal slower. Considering the car’s hefty 2.6-tonne weight as tested, that’s all the more impressive.

The car's brake energy regen feels well-judged - but some steering wheel paddles to help you blend it in before a corner without needing to 'tip in' to the brake pedal would be a boost to smooth drivability, and also make it feel like you're driving more efficiently.

A little less impressive is the car’s tendency to regulate and limit its motor power as heat builds up in its drive battery. Even on a chilly test day, our car had begun to peg back motor output to about 50% of a normal level before the end of our acceleration benchmarking process, at which point cooling running was needed to restore it. It repeated the same during limit handling testing, before three full-power flying laps of MIRA’s drying handling circuit had been completed.

This may simply be the result of conservative battery software calibration on the part of Polestar’s powertrain engineers – and, in any case, only during intensive autobahn driving would you ever be likely to experience the issue on the public road. Still, it’s not something we see from every premium EVs in 2025, and certainly not to the same extent.

In more normal driving, the 3 declines to bombard you with too much choice in configuring its powertrain. There are three brake regeneration settings, ranging from unfettered coasting on a trailing throttle up to one-pedal-style regen braking (although we would prefer to be able to toggle them on paddles, rather than the touchscreen).

Aside from those, you can choose between Range and Performance modes for the powertrain. It feels typically linear, potent and responsive in both. The former certainly isn’t made to feel like some nannyish Eco throttle calibration, although it does seem to soften accelerator response a little. Presumably because it defaults to propelling the car via the front motor, disengaging the rear one as often as it can to save energy, Range mode can also sometimes make you wait for a second or so before it will deliver full power against kickdown, which feels odd in an EV.

For this reason, Performance mode is the one to select for keener driving, and it delivers a likeably instant and muscular briskness that’s always tempting to tap into, and is also unaffected by any imitation engine noise.

More recently, we've tried the Single Motor on UK roads. It benefits from the same excellent driveability as the Dual Motor, so is very pleasnt to potter around in. However, we found its performance slightly underwhelming. While 295bhp sounds a healthy amount, this is still a 2.4-tonne car, so it results in 0-62mph in 7.5sec. That’s fine, but given the 3’s sporty aspirations, you can’t help but expect something punchier. For reference, the single-motor Porsche Macan Electric has 335bhp and takes 5.7sec

Assisted Driving - 3 stars

Polestar provides an adaptive cruise control system as standard, as well as blindspot monitoring, active lane keeping, driver monitoring and a speed limit information system with limit warnings.

There’s a permanent shortcut on the touchscreen to disable the speeding ‘bongs’ should you want to. Disabling the lane departure system, which tugs at the steering wheel, is harder – but you will want to, as it’s a little intrusive on country roads.

The driver monitoring system, meanwhile, doesn’t seem to be fully switchable and is a little heavyhanded and annoying - temporarily disabling the guided cruise control, for example, if it deems that you have been looking away from the road for too long or on repeated occasions (even though all you might have been doing is looking for the button to disable it). 

The £2300 Pilot Pack (standard on our Launch Edition test car) adds a semi-autonomous piloted cruise control, and certain parking and lane change aids. It suffers from a frustrating lack of control, however. The driver has no say over the adaptive cruise control's following distance whatsoever, let alone the option to switch to standard cruise control, and switching between adaptive cruise control and 'Pilot Assist', which will also do the steering for you, has to be done in the touchscreen. Once switched on, the lane guidance is a little flaky, and tends to drop in and out with inconsistent lane markings. Since it insists you drive with two hands on the wheel, at quarter to three, in order to stay engaged anyway, it’s a bit irksome on long journeys even when working well.

RIDE & HANDLING

9
Polestar 3 review 2025 24

The 3’s powertrain makes light work of lugging around its 2.6-tonne bulk, but the chassis’ capacity to hide that weight, delivering level, supple body control, and pleasingly tactile, fluent, balanced and engaging handling with it, is even more impressive, at least on the dual-motor versions.

Polestar is overstating the truth by no small amount when it suggests this 5m-long family SUV handles like a sports car. It isn’t agile enough, or sufficiently well tied down on challenging back roads, for that. Without four-wheel steering to sharpen its turn-in for tighter bends, it would probably narrowly lose out to a well-equipped Porsche Macan for outright driver appeal on a twisting, narrow mountain pass or country lane.

It does remarkably well for driver appeal considering its size and heft, and how comfortably it goes about cruising, however. In many ways, this feels like the natural heir to the Jaguar I-Pace. It rides and handles like a big, slightly highsided car with a centre of gravity lowered by its drive battery; that can afford gentle lateral stiffness because of that; and that rides with a compliance you wouldn’t expect given how gamely it corners.

There’s an understated but clear sense of tactile feel to the steering, which isn’t feigning directional dynamism (the rack’s got three turns between locks) but feels intuitively paced and inviting to use. Polestar offers three adaptive damping models: Normal, Nimble and Firm. The car’s ride doesn’t feel overly firm even in the last of those, working well on the road in all three.

Put the car’s stability control system in ESC Sport mode and you will even begin to feel the e-diff vectoring its torque in longer corners in which the chassis can settle, and you can explore its adjustability. There are understated shades of Mitsubishi Lancer Evo about the way it begins to overdrive its outside rear wheel and rotate its attitude positively for as long as you maintain positive steering angle, gently powersliding its way into neutrality and beyond in a way that no 2.6-tonne pseudo-SUV really has any right to do.

While the Single Motor is supposedly tuned to feel like the Dual Motor, it hasn’t really worked. Along with the chassis kit, the Single Motor has lost much of what makes the 3 unique – and particularly appealing. Driving the two versions back to back on the same roads, it’s remarkable how much less turn-in bite and steering feel the LRSM has. Where the LRDM demonstrates lucid agility as it rotates through a corner on the power, the LRSM needs to be pushed much harder before the chassis starts to come alive – only for the stability control to clumsily take away the power, even with the ESC in Sport mode. It doesn't ride as well, either, with considerably more pitching and jostling over uneven roads.

MPG & RUNNING COSTS

7
Polestar 3 review 2025 01

While our car’s optional 22in forged alloy wheels seemed to enable it to both launch from rest and stop from speed surprisingly well for something so heavy, they did appear to have had a less favourable impact on its efficiency and range.

Temperatures during our testing ranged from 4-8deg C, which will have also taken a toll. Even so, the 246-mile touring range we recorded for the car was slightly disappointing. On standard 20in wheels and in warmer conditions, it seems fair to expect the Polestar 3 to return closer to 270 real-world motorway miles, and perhaps 300 at lower speeds and around town.

To habitually see more than 300 miles, you will need the less powerful, single-motor model. On our test drive in mild spring weather, we saw 3.0mpkWh – decent, if not exactly setting new class standards.

Given its size and performance level, the 3 is quite attractively priced, at least in relative terms. It’s also quite well equipped without options, and is currently supported by 0% manufacturer finance offers with decent deposit contributions.

Our car rapid-charged quite quickly though low and medium states of charge, but never really approached its advertised power peak of 250kW. Its 149kW weighted average makes the car slower than an Audi Q6 E-tron and Kia EV9.

VERDICT

8
Polestar 3 review 2025 27

The 3 augurs well for the future of Polestar. Delivering something so likeably alternative on a shared platform, that really broadens the reach of the brand’s model catalogue and yet still feels every inch a Polestar to drive, is no mean feat.

Consider that the 3 weighs a good 250kg more than an equivalent Porsche Macan 4S yet isn’t outclassed by it in dynamic terms, and offers more on passenger space, refinement, versatility and luxury cabin appeal, and the achievement it represents becomes even clearer.

We would avoid the Single Motor, however. Although it is cheaper and more efficient, it feels like a de-contented version of what the 3 was meant to be.

In the right spec, it's an easy car to like principally because it looks and feels like nothing else, in a class of cars that can seem rather samey - and also because it’s comparably decent value for money, especially given the standard kit list. More than that, it strikes a very happy blend of comfort, pace, and even a little handling zing.

It’s disappointing that minor details tarnish the finished article, though: a distracting, touchscreen-dominated secondary control layout, annoying driver assistance systems, suboptimal efficiency…

Even so, we expect this car to spread Polestar’s gospel quite a bit wider, higher and farther.

Illya Verpraet

Illya Verpraet Road Tester Autocar
Title: Road Tester

As a road tester, Illya drives everything from superminis to supercars, and writes reviews and comparison tests, while also managing the magazine’s Drives section. Much of his time is spent wrangling the data logger and wielding the tape measure to gather the data for Autocar’s in-depth instrumented road tests.

He loves cars that are fun and usable on the road – whether piston-powered or electric – or just cars that are very fit for purpose. When not in test cars, he drives an R53-generation Mini Cooper S.

Matt Saunders

Matt Saunders Autocar
Title: Road test editor

As Autocar’s chief car tester and reviewer, it’s Matt’s job to ensure the quality, objectivity, relevance and rigour of the entirety of Autocar’s reviews output, as well contributing a great many detailed road tests, group tests and drive reviews himself.

Matt has been an Autocar staffer since the autumn of 2003, and has been lucky enough to work alongside some of the magazine’s best-known writers and contributors over that time. He served as staff writer, features editor, assistant editor and digital editor, before joining the road test desk in 2011.

Since then he’s driven, measured, lap-timed, figured, and reported on cars as varied as the Bugatti Veyron, Rolls-Royce PhantomTesla RoadsterAriel Hipercar, Tata Nano, McLaren SennaRenault Twizy and Toyota Mirai. Among his wider personal highlights of the job have been covering Sebastien Loeb’s record-breaking run at Pikes Peak in 2013; doing 190mph on derestricted German autobahn in a Brabus Rocket; and driving McLaren’s legendary ‘XP5’ F1 prototype. His own car is a trusty Mazda CX-5.

Vicky Parrott

Vicky Parrott

Vicky Parrott has been a motoring journalist since 2006, when she eventually did so much work experience at Autocar that it felt obliged to give her a job.

After that, she spent seven years as a features and news writer, video presenter and road tester for Autocar, before becoming deputy road test editor for What Car? in 2013. After five years with What Car?, Vicky spent a couple of years as associate editor of DrivingElectric and then embarked on a freelance career that has seen her return to writing for Autocar and What Car? as well as for The Daily Telegraph and many others.

Vicky has been a Car of the Year juror since 2020, and the proud owner of a 1992 Mercedes-Benz 300-SL 24V since 2017. She aspires to own an Alpine A110 and a Porsche Taycan Cross Turismo.