The Volkswagen Polo BlueGT has Active Cylinder Management to provide the petrol-engined Polo with diesel-like running costs
5 July 2012

What is it?

With car manufacturers seeking ever cleverer ways to reduce the consumption of their latest models to meet stringent emission standards we've been exposed to quite a lot of new fuel saving technologies n recent times.

Features such as automatic stop/start, brake energy recuperation, on-demand engine ancillaries and low rolling resistance tyres have gone from being exotic options not that long ago to just about universal standard today.

However, they're not the end of it. Because, as signs have it, there's another fuel saving technology that's about to go prime time: cylinder shutdown, or as Volkswagen prefers to refer to it, Active Cylinder Management (ACM), for small displacement engines.

Previewed by Volkswagen earlier this year, it is included on a frugal new version of the German car maker's latest turbocharged 1.4-litre four-cylinder direct injection petrol engine, the EA211 as it is known, fitted to a new sporting version of the Polo called the BlueGT.

The principle of ACM is simple, and a good deal less expensive than other systems already applied to larger capacity powerplants, with a set of electronic actuators sitting above the camshaft on the middle two cylinders controlling the movement of the valves and fuel injection.

At revs between 1400 and 4000rpm and torque loads between 18 and 74lb ft - a characteristic Volkswagen claims covers nearly 70 per cent of all driving states, the valves and injection process is shut down, effectively turning the engine into a 700cm3 twin for lower consumption and emissions, most noteably in city driving and at constant motorway speeds.

What's it like?

With 138bhp and 162lb ft, the Polo BlueGT is both eager and refined, with satisfying off the line accelerative qualities, a flexible in gear character and, thanks to a heavily overdriven seventh gear, a relaxed cruiser on the motorway. It always feels more enthusiastic than the Polo 1.2 TSI, as shown by its official 0-62mph time of 7.9sec and its 50-75mph fifth gear split of 9.5sec. Just don't expect Polo GTi levels of performance.

But its prime attraction is its economical nature. Volkswagen claims 62.7mpg, giving the Polo BlueGT average CO2 emissions of 105g/km. By comparison, the Polo 1.2 TSI is rated at 53.3mpg and 124g/km. On a 60 mile motorway run out of Amsterdam we managed 76.4mpg, proving both the worth of ACM and a series of aerodynamic tweaks brought to the new car, including bumpers, sills and rear hatch flaps brought over from the Polo BlueMotion.

The operation of ACM is virtually seamless with a display in the instrument being the only real indication of what mode you're in; there's a very slight alteration in engine character as it shuts down the valves and injection and switches into two cylinder mode. But as the pistons continue to operate within the second and third cylinders the reciprocating masses and inherent vibration does not change.

The engine never feels quite as strong in two cylinder mode as it does in four-cylinder mode, with tardier pick when you ease gently into the throttle. Push harder though and ACM switches the engine from two-cylinder back into four-cylinder mode, instantly providing the BlueGT with a full level of performance.

Should I buy one?

A game changer, then? In certain respects, yes. If the promise shown by the Polo BlueGT's new engine is any guide, cylinder shutdown is set to become an integral fuel saving feature in coming years - and not just high end models but in volume offerings, too.

Volkswagen says it is already preparing ACM for the seventh-generation Golf due out in September, suggesting the new technology ill help lessen its dependence on even costlier diesel engines as buyers once again warm to the more refined  qualities of its latest 1.4-litre four-cylinder unit. Given the way it broadens the Polo's spread of scope of abilities, we wouldn't disagree.

Volkswagen Polo BlueGT

Price: £18,750 (est); Top speed: 131mph; 0-62mph: 7.9secs; Economy: 62.7mpg; CO2: 105g/km; Kerb weight: 1146kg; Engine: 4-cyl, 1395cc turbocharged petrol; Installation: front, transverse, front-wheel drive; Power: 138bhp at 5600rpm; Torque: 162lb ft at 1500rpm; Gearbox: 7-speed double clutch

Join the debate

Comments
29

5 July 2012

Sub!!

In main text: "0-62mph time of 6.7sec".

In box copy: "0-62mph: 7.9secs".

Which is correct?

5 July 2012

Lightweight, quick, economical, good looking - the only thing that can spoil the party is the price.

Autocar wrote:

It always feels more enthusiastic than the Polo 1.2 TSI, as shown by its official 0-62mph time of 6.7sec

I thought it was 7.9sec for this car, and 6.7sec for the GTI.

5 July 2012

I wonder! If only 2 cylinders are used 70% of the time, what is the purpose of having a more expensive, heavier, 4 cyl engine with almost double the internal friction? Is Fiat's TwinAir a more logical alternative? It would appear so. And it is even more powerful for its capacity. For smaller cars, the size and weight of the Polo at least, it probably makes more sense.

5 July 2012

From what I have read the Fiat's TwinAir  doesn't work in the real world it may lower the VED but you don't seem to get the MPG.

5 July 2012

The 6.7 is for the Polo GTi from the VW website anyway.

5 July 2012

This is probably a naive view, but I was wondering if there would be any long term detrimental effects of not using the valves on two of the cylinders. My motoring is almost exclusively short stop-start town motoring, probably meaning that I'd be on two cylinders most of the time. Still, I'm sure that VW have tested this new technology extensively so that this won't be a problem.

5 July 2012

catnip wrote:

Still, I'm sure that VW have tested this new technology extensively so that this won't be a problem.

 

Hopefully this is so but there seem to have been a couple of cases recently when VW power units have been launched "not quite cooked"

5 July 2012

They should be using cylinder de-activationon diesels AS WELL, for 90+mpg and even lower CO2, NOT trying to cut down on the use of diesels.

5 July 2012

The 0-62mph time has been corrected - it is 7.9sec. We've also added the price which is estimated to be around £18,750 for a five door model with the twin-clutch auto

 

Regards

Stuart Milne, Digital Editor

5 July 2012

Petrol, Economical, plenty fast enough, doesn't look like it's crashed into an accessory shop and no fog lamps - nice. 

Approved. 

(as long as a manual box is available and it's geared at less than 25mph / 1000rpm is 6th...  tba)

Pages

Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

  • Lexus LC500
    Car review
    20 October 2017
    Futuristic Lexus LC coupé mixes the latest technology with an old-school atmospheric V8
  • Maserati Levante S GranSport
    First Drive
    20 October 2017
    Get ready to trade in your diesels: Maserati’s luxury SUV finally gets the engine it’s always needed
  • Jaguar XF Sportbrake TDV6
    First Drive
    19 October 2017
    The handsome Jaguar XF Sportbrake exhibits all the hallmarks that makes the saloon great, and with the silky smooth diesel V6 makes it a compelling choice
  • Volkswagen T-Roc TDI
    First Drive
    19 October 2017
    Volkswagen's new compact crossover has the looks, the engineering and the build quality to be a resounding success, but not with this diesel engine
  • BMW M550i
    First Drive
    19 October 2017
    The all-paw M550i is a fast, effortless mile-muncher, but there's a reason why it won't be sold in the UK