From £63,9139
Not only a superb GT car next to its rivals, but also the pick of the new Panamera range

Our Verdict

Porsche Panamera

Four-seat grand tourer bids to redefine performance in the luxury class

16 December 2016

What is it?

There they were. All three lined up neatly in the car park and a man from Porsche shouting: "Which one do you want first?" Oh dear. Four decades of trying to purge the gluttonous juvenile within, and still he lives on; without a moment’s hesitation, the reply was: "The red one, please." 

The red one was the mighty Panamera Turbo. In an instant, the eyes had clocked the silver Panamera 4S and blue 4S Diesel sitting next to it and the frontal lobe had dismissed them as underlings. You can read about the Panamera Turbo here, but for now, let’s look at why it was so wrong to poo-poo the petrol 4S. 

Compared with the outgoing 4S, the V6 engine has shrunk to 2.9 litres but has a couple of centrally mounted ‘hot vee’ turbos plumbed in. So not only is the new engine 14kg lighter than the outgoing 3.0-litre unit - not to mention considerably more efficient - but it also produces an extra 20bhp and 22lb ft more torque. Which results in zero to 62mph (with the optional Sports Chrono package) in just 4.2sec. The 0-100mph sprint takes a mere 10 seconds.

What's it like?

It doesn’t feel that fast. Panameras seemingly don’t, even the chest-wig Turbo models, and being a hereditary condition, this afflicts the 4S as well. Yet judging by the rapidity with which those liquid crystal speedo characters click over, be in no doubt: it is rapid. 

The 4S is quite a screamer, too, but as always you need to switch on the optional sports exhaust to exploit the acoustics. Then it barks pleasantly raspy tones, as opposed to the kind of spine-tinglingly fruity ones that would inspire you to poke about in the engine’s upper reaches. 

You still will, though, because of the delicious power delivery. Peak torque may begin at 1750rpm, but it feels at its strongest beyond 3000rpm, then keeps building exponentially until the needle is pointing at the red zone. Add in the keen throttle response and it feels quite un-turbo-like, with a power delivery more akin to a naturally aspirated multi-valve motor.

The PDK dual-clutch automatic gearbox is good in either auto or manual mode, darting swiftly and seamlessly between ratios. Only its software blots the copybook, by blocking manual downchanges until the revs fall inexplicably low. You sense nothing more than a laptop tweak would alleviate this little woe.

There are no such issues with the programming of Porsche’s new 4D-Chassis Control four-wheel drive system, though. Even if you do the incomprehensible and switch off all the driver assistance programmes on a sodden, challenging Scottish mountain road, it gives you a few degrees of twitch at the rear, after which it shuffles the power frontwards so you can rifle it out of corner. ‘Measured fun’ would be an apposite description.

That could apply to the charmed handling as well. The Panamera may weigh the equivalent of a mid-sized hippopotamus, but sticking with the critter theme, it changes direction with the agility of a housefly. That’s partly down to the Panamera’s new party trick of optional four-wheel steering, which aids rear-end stability at speed to the extent that Porsche can fit a quicker rack. And apart from a slightly digital feel around the straight-ahead, the wheel builds weight so effectively that you can use that lively front end with utter confidence. There’s enough feel to help you gauge the reaction between tread and road, too.

This lucid fluidity spills into the suspension. We thought the Turbo was good, but the 4S’s waif-like V6 affords it a bonus dimension of body control, albeit with the adaptive air-sprung set-up fitted. It’s supple and comfortable in its softest mode but has a tenacious, terrain-hugging resolve in its firmest setting. Too stiff? Not on your nelly; there’s enough vertical wheel control in hand to keep things resolutely stable, even on the crinkliest roads. 

Inside the Panamera, Porsche has upped the razzmatazz. Those messy buttons on the Mk1’s centre console have been smoothed off with touch-sensitive switches in the Mk2. There’s also a new multimedia system with all the connectivity you could desire, displayed with sharp imagery on the 12.3in main screen. There are also two smaller TFT screens flanking the traditional analogue-age rev counter sitting right in front of you. 

It’s all very clever indeed, but to be honest, not particularly practical. The touch-sensitive buttons are tricky to locate on the move, while the multimedia system's layers of menus are so numerous as to be a distraction.

Should I buy one?

Infotainment gripes aside, this is a stunningly engineered, superbly executed car. Not a limo, mind; buy a Mercedes S-Class if you want one of those. No, this is a highly proficient GT car right up there with the BMW M6 Gran Coupé and Audi RS7, with at least as much room for a 6ft driver and three similar-sized passengers.

And far from being the Turbo’s underling, the 4S is the bees knees: fast enough without being silly and, by a whisker, a sweeter-handling thing than the Turbo. Knowledge is power, they say. Faced with our opening dilemma again and knowing what we know now, we’d forsake the Turbo’s power and pick the 4S. 

Porsche Panamera 4S

Location Scotland; On sale Now; Price £88,700; Engine V6, 2894cc, twin-turbo, petrol; Power 434bhp at 5650-6000rpm; Torque 406lb ft at 1750-5500rpm; Kerb weight 1945kg; Gearbox 8-spd dual-clutch automatic; 0-62mph 4.4sec (4.2sec with Sports Chrono Package); Top speed 179mph; Economy 34.9mpg (combined); CO2/BIK tax band 184g/km, 33%; Rivals BMW M6 Gran Coupé, Audi RS7

Join the debate


16 December 2016
A car that heavy with 'only' 434bhp getting to 100mph in 10 seconds? Really?

16 December 2016
Have you seen how much torque it has though?

16 December 2016
I think 567lb/ft is the more pertinent figure here

16 December 2016
Leslie Brook wrote:

I think 567lb/ft is the more pertinent figure here

Isn't it 416lb/ft?


16 December 2016
A great car for cruising along empty Autobahns when traveling between Corporate office where you have your Executive parking space reserved. Just don't try to park it roadside in an pretty Italian Village or overtake a slow truck on a British B road where its' length and girth is more than a Range Rover!




16 December 2016
Deputy wrote:

A great car for cruising along empty Autobahns when traveling between Corporate office where you have your Executive parking space reserved. Just don't try to park it roadside in an pretty Italian Village or overtake a slow truck on a British B road where its' length and girth is more than a Range Rover!

Yes, I agree with you that sport cars (including 4 instead of 5 seater sport saloons) should never be so long and wide, even taking improvement in stability into account. The Panamera is a bad offender (especially in view of the compact dimensions of the air cooled 911), the Mercedes AMG GT is another.

16 December 2016
What about the Hybrid? it has more HP-462,a Lot more torque-515lb.ft. and much better fuel consumption.It is also cheaper!



16 December 2016
torque was a typo. Its more than the AMG 4.0 V8. Is it 467? Otherwise looks a great if large saloon. Thought it would be more like 60 than 88 plus options. Its mega money.

16 December 2016
The 4S has 405 lb/ft, the Turbo has 567 lb/ft. The figures aren't bad for a 2.9 litre V6 though.

16 December 2016
For that money you could have a Porsche Cayman AND top-spec XC60 or XC90.
The later 2 are ideal if you want to seat more than 4 and first 2 are fine if you want to be able to park it.

typos1 - Just can’t respect opinion


Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

  • Ford Mustang
    First Drive
    24 March 2018
    Sixth-generation Mustang gets a leaner face, revised suspension, improved safety equipment and a more power V8. We see how it fares on southern French roads
  • First Drive
    23 March 2018
    Fully-loaded, big-hitting diesel CLS shows the potential perils of ticking too many options boxes on your order form. A good car with a bad suspension combination.
  • BMW M5
    First Drive
    22 March 2018
    Super saloon deploys four-wheel drive to improve every facet of its driving experience. Faster and more capable than any, and more exciting than most, of its celebrated predecessors
  • Range Rover Sport SVR
    First Drive
    22 March 2018
    More power and an intoxicating soundtrack have breathed new life into our love affair with the biggest, baddest Range Rover Sport variant
  • First Drive
    21 March 2018
    The new Vantage has been developed as a Porsche 911 beater, and our first taste on UK roads suggests it can live up to that bold claim