From £29,0358
Balances sensible running costs and fair practicality with an enjoyable drive and healthy desirability factor

Our Verdict

Mercedes-Benz C-Class
The C-Class shares a lot of its looks with the new S-Class, furthering its desirability

Can our perennial runner-up in this class finally reach the top spot?

16 November 2015

What is it?

The new Mercedes C-Class Coupe is more than just a three-door version of the C-Class saloon, that’s for sure. This sporting take on Merc’s staple compact executive shares only its wings and bonnet with the saloon and gets a different take on the multi-link front suspension set-up, 15mm lowered ride height and tweaked steering software. It’s also the first car in its class to offer adaptive air suspension, albeit as an £895 option that was included on our test car.

The question is, does this sleek new coupe live up to its sports car billing even when fitted with the twin-turbocharged 2.1-litre diesel and new nine-speed automatic gearbox, or is this sensible yet popular variant all style and no substance?

What's it like?

It's really very good - substantially sharper overall than the saloon. Sure, it’s not a car that feels overtly pointy and eager the minute you set off; rather, it feels quite calm, yet connected enough through the noticeably improved steering to satisfy in the everyday muddle of busy town or motorway commuting.

The new auto is another notable improvement over the seven-speeder that you still currently get with the C 250 d saloon. Step-off is smooth and progressive, and shifts are blurred well even in vigorous driving, letting you make the most of the gruff-sounding but impressively gutsy diesel. Give it everything and you get a pause on kickdown and a slight shunt on upshifts, but it still shifts crisply and when you want it to, even if resorting to the paddles is still the more rewarding way to go in faster stuff.

There’s a real bite to the front end; it feels incisive as you turn in and the steering delivers a really nice, organic build-up of resistance through the corner. It’s not as darty-feeling as the quicker rack in a BMW 4 Series, but you could argue that the slower, more natural feel of the Merc is the more rewarding set-up.

The optional air springs of our car, mated to the standard 18in alloys, did a fine job, too. Body control is a touch ponderous at times, but generally the car is well tied down and keeps itself in check even through tight cornering, while the ride is mostly very good. It’ll shudder and bob about a bit over really scruffy stuff, but generally it softens even high-speed intrusions and is a settled, comfortable cruiser.

You’re unlikely to be disappointed with the interior, either. New sports seats are supportive and comfortable and include adjustable lumbar support as standard even in base Sport trim, while the dash looks smart with a tactile blend of materials and finishes. Some might not like the way the 7.0in colour screen looks tacked on rather than integrated, and the system takes some getting used to with its overly complex menus and controls, but the graphics are crisp and you’ve got all the functionality you could want, including sat-nav, Bluetooth, DAB and full connectivity for your phone or MP3 player.

It’s a bit of a squeeze to get in the back, but nothing unusual by the standards of this class, and once you’re in, there’s enough head and leg room for an average-sized adult to be comfortable even on longer journeys - certainly usefully better than in an Audi A5, and about on a par with a BMW 4 Series. There are only two seats in the back, though, and it’s rather dark back there, but for anyone looking at a mid-sized coupe, this is likely to be more than practical enough for the occasional journey four up.

The boot is similarly fit for purpose, stretching back a long way and offering plenty enough space for the obligatory set of golf clubs.

Should I buy one?

If you’re in the market for a plush diesel coupe, this should be top of your shortlist. There’s clearly strong competition from the likes of the BMW 4 Series, but the Merc is competitively priced and generously equipped, and in many ways there's more charm and sense of involvement to the way it goes down the road than you get from the slightly more heavy-handed, albeit still thoroughly enjoyable 4 Series.

We’ll have to wait to find out how standard suspension fares on UK roads, but anyone buying in this class shouldn’t make a decision without first sampling the C-Class.

Mercedes-Benz C 250 d Coupe AMG Line

Location Malaga; On sale Now; Price £37,615; Engine 4 cyls, 2143cc, turbodiesel; Power 201bhp at 3800rpm; Torque 369lb ft at 1600-1800rpm; Gearbox 9-spd automatic; Kerb weight 1645kg; Top speed 153mph; 0 62mph 6.7sec; Economy 67.3mpg (combined); CO2/tax band 109g/km, 19%

Join the debate

Comments
13

17 November 2015
Not a Merc fan but I never cease to be amazed by some of the stats coming from premium manuafactures i.e. a 0-62 time of 6.7 seconds with only 200bhp despite the fact it comess in pretty heavy at 1645kg. Then the top speed nearly hitting the voluntary limit of 155 with just 200bhp, oh I did I mention a combined figure of 67 mpg. Unthinkable 10 years ago.

 

Hydrogen cars just went POP

17 November 2015
...torque output of 369lb.ft. That's what makes it accelerate this smartly. Good CD makes for good maximum speed despite not immense power.

17 November 2015
I think this is a lot better looking than the A5 or the 4-Series, inside and out. Only thing that I don't like is Merc's infatuation with the stupid cheap looking tablet on the dash. I don't understand why they went down that route, ruins all the interiors they put it in. It wouldn't put me off buying one, if I were in this market

17 November 2015
I agree that the high mounted "tablet" screen for the sat-nav looks like an afterthought, but at least it's functional. I recently spent three weeks in the US with a Chrysler 300C rental car. The built-in sat-nav screen was mounted quite low and angled upwards, making it all but impossible to see when the sun was shining. Initially I thought the full-length glass sunroof was to blame, but closing the blind made almost no difference: all I could see was the finger marks on the screen. I had to rely in the small secondary screen between the instruments, which gave very limited information; not ideal when you're trying to work out the right lane to be in on the freeway for an upcoming exit!

22 November 2015
superstevie wrote:

I think this is a lot better looking than the A5 or the 4-Series, inside and out. Only thing that I don't like is Merc's infatuation with the stupid cheap looking tablet on the dash. I don't understand why they went down that route, ruins all the interiors they put it in. It wouldn't put me off buying one, if I were in this market

I would believe if the bezel was much much slimmer, best is to the point of non-existence, it would have looked fantastic. Especially if the bezel is so slim that it looks like there's none and it's just a screen floating there.

Dash designer might have erroneously wrote 1.5 inches instead of 1.5 cm on the memo.

But with or without this floating tablet, it's still the car with the best interior in it's category.

TS7

17 November 2015
... car company 'press pack' photographs (the same as appeared on the Auto Express website last week)? It just leaves one with a nagging doubt that it was actually driven!

17 November 2015
...or does anyone else see shades of American 1940's coupés in the rear three-quarter view, with the very shallow side windows and wide c-pillar? It is not so evident in the photos above, but moreso in the earlier studio shots taken from a higher angle. Not unattractive, but unusual. Can't imagine it's much fun sitting in the back!

18 November 2015
Satnav screen still looks strange, at least the back doesn't look like a peugeot as in the saloon.

bol

21 November 2015
Much less flaccid and frumpy than their saloons and infinitely better resolved than the CLA/S. I'd love to see them fit their PHEV drivetrain to this.

21 November 2015
Is that a CD slot in the dash? Who listens to CD's in 2015?

Pages

Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

  • Skoda-Karoq 2.0 TDI 4x4
    First Drive
    16 October 2017
    Diesel version of Skoda’s junior SUV is unobtrusive and undemanding, but we’d still go for the silkier petrol version of the Karoq
  • Audi Q7 e-tron
    First Drive
    16 October 2017
    Expensive and flawed but this understated diesel-electric Audi Q7 has a lot to offer
  • Citroën C3
    First Drive
    16 October 2017
    Is the third gen Citroën C3 ‘fresh and different’ enough to take on its supermini rivals? We spend six months with one to find out
  • BMW X3
    First Drive
    15 October 2017
    A satisfying rework of the X3 that usefully improves its handling, cabin finish, space and connectivity to make this BMW a class front-runner again
  • Vauxhall Insignia Country Tourer
    First Drive
    13 October 2017
    Off-road estate is now bigger, more spacious and available with torque-vectoring all-wheel drive, but is it enough to make its German rivals anxious?