From £28,535
Cleaner, more economical IS pays the price in terms of performance

What is it?

Well, this is unusual. Not the fact that Lexus now has a cleaner version of its diesel-powered IS compact premium saloon, but that its environmental credentials come at the expense of power and performance, and that you have no choice in the matter.

The IS200d, which replaces the IS220d, retains the same 2.2-litre, four-cylinder diesel engine but with changes to its combustion chamber and piezo-electric fuel injectors. It also now has a diesel particulate filter to meet Euro 5 emissions standards. The result is a claimed combined economy figure of 55.4mpg (up from 50.4mpg) and a CO2 figure of 134g/km (down from 148g/km). However, power and torque have also been reduced; the IS200d's 148bhp and 251lb ft are 27bhp and 44lb ft down on the model it replaces.

See pics of the Lexus IS 200d in action

What's it like?

In urban use this isn't so much of a problem, as the spread of torque is sufficient for smooth progress, but out of town the IS200d needs to be worked for its performance, and even then it is slower than some rivals.

Lexus' asking price of £28,290 for the F Sport trim tested here (which also gets some exterior upgrades for 2011) is unchanged from the price of the equivalent IS220d. Although that makes it £1000 cheaper than a BMW 320d M Sport, in every other respect the BMW (181bhp, 280lb ft, 60.1mpg and 125g/km) trounces the Lexus. As does the Mercedes-Benz C220 CDI Sport, even though it is more expensive still. Going in the opposite direction on price, the BMW 318d M Sport, although less powerful than the IS200d, is still faster and more economical.

Should I buy one?

If you can get past the fact that the IS200d is competitively outmanoeuvred, it remains an interesting alternative, one we still find subjectively more satisfying than objective testing would suggest.

Five years on, and in F Sport trim, it remains an attractive car. The ride and handling mix satisfies more than many modern rivals, and the transmission on this model is far better than our original IS220d road test car. Sadly, our criticisms at the time of poor rear seat and boot space, plus a relatively unrefined engine, still remain, and are now supplemented by the fact that it feels too slow.

Jamie Corstorphine

Lexus IS200d F Sport

Price: £28,290; Top speed: 127mph; 0-62mph: 10.2sec; Economy: 55.4mpg (combined); CO2: 134g/km; Kerb weight: 1635kg; Engine: 4 cyls in line, 2231cc, turbodiesel; Power: 148bhp at 3600rpm; Torque: 251lb ft at 2000rpm; Gearbox: 6-spd manual

Join the debate

Add a comment…
Steak Bake 6 December 2010

Re: Lexus IS 200d F-Sport

Hi J400 Have you driven the car? If not please do and if you have not driven a 220d do them back to back. You will notice the difference in that the 200 is a lot more smooth and quiter than the 220d - lacks the performance as many have said but this is the best the car will get Also - a great new colour in Ultra Blue as tested!!

LongLiveTazio 6 December 2010

Re: Lexus IS 200d F-Sport

"one we still find subjectively more satisfying than objective testing would suggest" What a bizarre statement. Since when have Autocar ever tested 'objectively'? These reviews are written by one person, it's always going to be subjective - it isn't consensus opinion. That suggests that you would hold back on having a personal opinion for the sake of 'objectivity'?! Smacks of 'I can't be seen to like a Lexus' to me, because if you prefer it over a BMW you are not seen as a keen driver. If it was objective the car's demographic would be considered and reviewed accordingly... which rarely happens. More often it's simply in terms of how well the car drives, which is something Autocar seems to have done more and more over the last few years (and is just as subjective, what one person likes is not universal). There are lots of simple reasons that Lexus do good business and one needs to look at the ownership proposition as a whole: their customer service is the industry paradigm.

Maxycat 5 December 2010

Re: Lexus IS 200d F-Sport

artill wrote:
I cant blame Toyota for not developing the diesels more, i doubt a few extra sales would have recovered the outlay.
In this sector of the car market having a good diesel version is essential as most cars sold in Europe, including the UK, are diesel. The BMW 3 series, Mercedes C class and Audi A4 all sell more diesels than petrol in Europe by a large margin. It is a shame but the Americans and to some extent the Japanese fail to see the advantages available from switching to diesel but for the Americans with their £2 per gallon fuel costs it is understandable.