From £33,0567
With a 2.0-litre turbo engine, Infiniti's premium coupé is refined and brisk enough but remains a left-field choice

Our Verdict

Infiniti Q60

Infiniti’s mid-sized coupé has the looks to do well, but little of the substance to go with them

2016 Infiniti Q60 2.0T Premium Tech

What is it?

Put simply, this is the entry point for the Infiniti Q60 range – the two-door coupé version of the Q50 saloon. Instead of a 400bhp twin-turbo V6 under the bonnet, you get a more modest 2.0-litre four-cylinder engine that also benefits from a bit of forced induction.

'A bit' is the right turn of phrase here; air isn’t so much forced into the cylinders as lightly persuaded. The result is a modest 208bhp, enough to propel nearly 1800kg of Infiniti to 62mph in a reasonable 7.3sec.

The pricier V6 may get four-wheel drive as standard, but you have to be content with rear-wheel drive in the 2.0T. What you can have is Infiniti’s drive-by-wire Direct Adaptive Steering (DAS) system. This is standard on Sport models and an £800 option on other variants. This has had its software tweaked in an attempt to improve feel and feedback over the same system in the Q50. 

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

What's it like?

Although there are no doubt a few of you wondering why there’s no fleet-friendly diesel option, there are a number of advantages to having a petrol powerplant. The first is refinement; the Q60 may sound pleasingly rorty when worked hard, but it fires up and cruises with virtually no vibration and a subdued noise.

For general schlepping, you don’t need to push the engine too hard to get the required level of thrust. If you want to go faster, then you need to explore the upper reaches of the rev range, something that brings us to our first problem: the gearbox.

The seven-speed torque converter automatic is smooth in normal use but can be slow and clumsy when you flatten the throttle, pausing before it shuffles down a couple of ratios to get the engine spinning into the powerband. If you’re looking to pull off a finely timed overtaking manoeuvre, we’d advise manually selecting the cog you want.

Given the unspectacular power-to-weight ratio, it's a surprise to feel the traction control stepping in regularly. Switch it off (or as off as you can) and you'll soon find that the rear of the Q60 can be persuaded to follow a very different line from the front, especially on winter tyres and in damp conditions.

Still, gathering the rear of the car up is easy enough and if the angle gets too wild, the stability control steps in to tidy things up. The electronic steering’s quick action even in Comfort mode certainly helps.

That doesn’t mean there’s now feedback; the steering still feels numb, with very little difference between the seven modes, just a little more gloopy in weight as you move up the sporting scale. On our test car, there was also a disconcerting clonk when the steering was pushed up against the lock stops.

Even in Premium Tech trim (as opposed to Sport), the ride is surprisingly fidgety over what looks like smooth roads. Adaptive suspension is available but doesn't seem to make a great deal of difference.

Inside, there’s no doubting the richness of the materials used. Everything feels pleasingly soft and of high quality until you get to the lowest reaches of the cabin. Spoiling things slightly are some of the Nissan parts-bin switches and readouts.

The infotainment system features two touchscreens, mounted one on top of the other. While it has plenty of app-based connectivity options, it’s often sluggish to respond to commands and looks rather old-school. At least you get good old-fashioned buttons for the heater controls. As for the rear, leg room is good, but head room is tight even for shorter individuals.

Should I buy one?

If you’re smitten with the looks, the Q60 is certainly worth considering. Apart from the somewhat jittery ride and numb steering, it’s a decent enough steer that’s quick and refined enough for the majority of situations.

The trouble is that the BMW 4 Series is a more engaging driver’s car, the Mercedes-Benz C-Class Coupé is a better cruiser when fitted with air suspension and both have more appealing interiors. Factor in the lack of a low-emissions version and we fear the Q60 might be a rare sight on British roads.

2016 Infiniti Q60 2.0T Premium Tech

Location Switzerland; On sale Now; Price £37,690 Engine 4 cyls, 1991cc, turbo, petrol; Power 208bhp at 5500rpm Torque 258Ib ft at 1250-3500rpm; Gearbox 7-spd automatic; Kerb weight 1761kg; Top speed 146mph; 0-62mph 7.3sec; Economy 41.5mpg (combined); CO2/tax band 156g/km, 28%; Rivals Mercedes-Benz C 200 Coupé, BMW 420i.

Join the debate


15 December 2016
Is this based on a Mercedes C-class coupe in the same way the smaller Infinitis are based on the A-class, because it certainly looks like it is? No mention of it in the review though.

16 September 2017
Jeremy wrote:

Is this based on a Mercedes C-class coupe in the same way the smaller Infinitis are based on the A-class, because it certainly looks like it is? No mention of it in the review though.

No. This is based on a very old fm Nissan platform.....same as 370z. This is why it is a porker. Nissan utterly obsessed with qashqai and juke...and are neglecting the rest of the range including their premium brand. Infiniti needs real car living engineers at the helm...not businessmen such as ghosn. He is good for Nissan and Renault but has no idea what premium means. I think the cars look good but they lack identity and reek of parasitic accountants feeding off the development budget. They are successful in the US but have always have been. The small infinitis will now not be cross pollinated with Mercedes meaning they will have their own home grown platform. Qx50 has to be good....I fear it will be flawed once again.

15 December 2016
There's no way the journalist would start the review with a statement how light this 2.0 turbo is, 208hp is roundabout there for an executive Coupe

15 December 2016
How on earth is it so heavy? Ridiculous.

15 December 2016
scrap wrote:

How on earth is it so heavy? Ridiculous.

Yep. How in hell is that a 1,800 kg car???

15 December 2016
Infiniti. Should've stayed stateside. They'll push them for a few years, realise no one wants them and quietly pull the plug.

15 December 2016
I agree with you! Infiniti will never take off in this country and it's also sluggish in the rest of Europe.

15 December 2016
Remove all the sound-deadening materials, infotainment, electric gizmos and also.. the artificial drive-by-wire steering, one may have created a new-gen Nissan Silvia. Well, less is more!

15 December 2016
S­­u­­p­­e­­­­r E­­a­­si­­e­­st 0n­­l!­­nee H­­o­­me o­­ppo­­rt­­un­­ity fo­­r a­­ll. ma­­ke 8­­7 D­­o­­ll­­ar­­s p­­e­­r ­­h­­o­­u­­r a­­nd M­­ake ­­52­­512 ­­Do­­llars ­­pe­­r m­­o­­nth.­­Al­­l ­­yo­­u j­­ust N­­e­­ed an ­­In­­­­te­­rn­­et C­­onne­­ct­­ion and a ­­C­­ompu­­ter To Ma­­ke Som­­e Ex­­tra c­­a­­sh.
V­­i­­sit­­e­­ t­­­­hi­­s li­­n­­­­k­­­­


20 December 2016
I'm confused by the decision of Infiniti to market its products at the same price as Mercedes and BMW. You can't 'create' a car brand at that level - it's nonsense to say Infiniti IS a premium brand and price it's cars as such.

You need to take the Skoda approach and build great cars that are several thousand pounds cheaper than your competitors. Customers will buy them as they represent value and they will become loyal. Skodas are now listing at the same price as the Fords, Peugeots and Vauxhalls and are generally seen as better cars. 20 years ago that would have been laughable. Lexus took 20 years to get to where they are today and they still have to offer much more kit for the same money to make a small number of sales.

Instead Infiniti offers an inferior product at the same price as its competitors and then wonders why it fails.

The same applies to Cadillac and its latest 'assault' on the UK car market with a £70K LHD only Vauxhall Vectra.

Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week