From £15,760
Needs to ride better or be more involving. Looks like a Type R-lite, but isn’t

Our Verdict

Honda Civic

The Honda Civic is an impressive achievement and a worthy rival to the Volkswagen Golf and Ford Focus, but it isn't quite up to class-leading standards

Matt Prior
12 October 2006

What is it?

The mildly sporting Civic Type S. It’s Type R-lite and, seemingly, good value at £15,250.

If we had a pound for every time a manufacturer said ‘sporty’ at a press launch, moving the Autocar road test office to the Nordschleife would be more than just a fantasy. But this 3dr Civic is a nicely turned out piece of kit.

Overall dimensions are the same as the Civic 5dr, but the front doors are longer, there’s a more pronounced kick to the window line and the bumpers are lower. The rear track was been widened by 20mm and the side skirts, front splitter and 17-inch alloys complement the ensemble rather nicely. I was worried at the launch that the Civic’s looks might date badly – and they still may. But right now, it’s a real looker.

Inside the Type S you’ll find all the trademarks of a semi-sporting hatch: a leather-bound steering wheel and Alcantara seats. The rest of the regular Civic cabin is as intriguing as ever. The two-tier dashboard is offset by beautifully lit dials, an intricate steering wheel, aluminium pedals and a peculiar ball at the base of the gearlever. And it works. Other than the poor rear visibility, the Civic is ergonomically sound and, even in three-door form, spacious.

What's it like?

At first, it’s quite a lot like the five-door Civic to drive. The steering’s light, fast and accurate, but you soon realise that the ride’s more nuggety.

The Type S gets revised spring and damper settings over the 5dr and rides on 225/45 tyres, which give it a worse ride than the regular Civic. And that’s a worry, because it wasn’t great in the first place. The pay-offs are moderately good body control and high grip levels.

The Civic hangs on gamely before dropping into understeer, but the electric power steering still gives no involvement – there’s all too little tactile feedback or intimacy and no incentive to drive it in the way that a hot hatch should be driven.

Still, the driveline is smooth. The Type S comes only with a 1.8-litre petrol or a 2.2-litre diesel. Both drive through slick six-speed gearboxes, and although we usually recommend the diesel option, here we’d go for the petrol. The i-CDTi lacks the quietness that it has in the Accord, and although it generates 138bhp – as much as the petrol engine – it does so more frantically and over a far smaller range. The 1.8-litre, SOHC petrol is a more willing companion, with linear response and a better sound.

Should I buy one?

The basics are there in the Type S, but they’ll need to be better honed for the new Type R if it is to be properly engaging. As it is now, the Type S is moderately enjoyable, but doesn’t ride well enough to be a normal, sensible Civic. If you want sensible, there’s always the basic S model. Everyone else should wait until March for the full-house Type R.

Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

  • Volvo V90
    First Drive
    19 October 2017
    The Volvo V90 is a big estate ploughing its own furrow. We’re about to see if it is refreshing or misguided
  • Kia Stonic
    First Drive
    18 October 2017
    Handsome entrant into the bulging small crossover market has a strong engine and agile handling, but isn’t as comfortable or complete as rivals
  • Hyundai Kona
    First Drive
    18 October 2017
    Hyundai's funky-looking Kona crossover with a peppy three-cylinder engine makes all the right noises for the car to be a success in a crowded segment
  • Citroën C3 Aircross
    First Drive
    17 October 2017
    The Citroen C3 Aircross has got funky looks and a charming interior, but it's another small SUV, and another dynamic miss. Numb steering is just one thing keeping it from class best
  • Skoda-Karoq 2.0 TDI 4x4
    First Drive
    16 October 2017
    Diesel version of Skoda’s junior SUV is unobtrusive and undemanding, but we’d still go for the silkier petrol version of the Karoq