From £20,340
The tenth generation Honda Civic ditches its space race styling but is that enough to help it make a contender in a congested segment? We found out over seven months

Why we ran it: Competition among family hatches is fierce. So we had seven months to find out if the new Honda Civic is up to the task

Month 1 - Month 2 - Month 3 - Month 4 - Month 5 - Month 6 - Month 7 - Specs

Life with a Honda Civic: Month 7

The Civic departs; it'll be missed – 7 February 2018

According to an old motoring adage, if you have to measure an improvement, you haven’t made one. So there was no need, when we took delivery of our Civic, to reach for the slide rules and tape measures: one drive was enough to tell us that this all-new car was a vast improvement on the model it replaced in nearly every area.

But what people seemed to be far more interested in initially was the new car’s raffish styling. At first, I thought it so ugly I was afraid to go near it, especially at night, but as time went by I grew to love it. Our red car with black alloys looked great, and I was often asked if our humble 127bhp 1.0 triple in a mid-spec SR trim was the Type R version. Young people seemed to like it, which should please Honda.

However, according to another old motoring adage, there’s no substitute for cubic inches – and, there’s no getting away from it, our Civic was rather humbly endowed. We thought the 1.0-litre engine the sweet spot in the range and its on-paper performance looks adequate but, on the road, it could feel a little short of puff, this feeling exacerbated by its unusually linear power delivery and relatively low (5500rpm) redline.

Its economy was occasionally a source of concern too. Our final overall average was 37.6mpg – still good, but not exceptionally so.

It could all get a bit vocal too. The engine produced its own distinctive offbeat burble, but it was the road noise that offended the most. The Civic’s fat tyres looked great but their wide footprint could kick up the decibels, especially on motorways.

Back to top

But here I must stop, because it’s beginning to sound like we didn’t enjoy our time with the Civic when the opposite was true – we loved it. It won’t surprise you to learn that in our 5000 miles with it, nothing went wrong, nothing fell off and, with the exception of the tyre pressure warning light pinging on once, not one thing gave us cause for concern.

All who drove it enthused about it too. It starts off with the low driving position, which I loved, and the clear and logical layout of the dash and the controls. The gearlever falls to hand and that gearchange is a slick delight. Best of all is the steering, which is ideally weighted and a joy to use.

It was more than spacious enough for my family of four, and the boot was cavernous, with a super-useful false boot floor. The infotainment system was a bit of a pain and the visibility was limited by the bar across the rear window, but at least we enjoyed a rear view camera as part of our SR trim.

This car felt like a Honda of old, quasi-sporting, thoughtfully engineered and solidly made. Back in the day, the firm’s small motorbikes felt like mildly detuned versions of their super-sporting machinery, and that’s how this car felt – a bit like a de-tuned Civic Type R.

So don’t measure improvements. Is the Civic a good car? Yes. Would I recommend it? Yes. Would I run one again? Yup, certainly would.

Back to the top

Life with a Honda Civic: Month 6

The Civic does well delivering the goods – 28 December 2017

Pressed to the task, our Civic always delivers.

Well, at least it delivered a lot of house items of indivisible and varying sizes to a rented storage unit, prior to a recent house sale.

The boot is a bit of a stunner: big, wide and mostly flat, with an easily removable parcel shelf. The total capacity is 1580 litres. Pity the rear seats don’t fold fully flat, though.

Mileage: 5112

Back to top

Back to the top

Life with a Honda Civic: Month 5

Is the long-term Civic a good cruiser – 15 November 2017

The Civic’s motorway manners are altogether quite amiable.

The lane assist is effective yet unobtrusive, the ride is controlled at speed and the seating position is comfortable over a long distance.

Just one foible stops it from being a decent cruiser: fuel economy. An average return of 36mpg over 400 miles of motorway is not enough to justify downsizing to this car’s 1.0-litre triple.

Mitch McCabe

Mileage: 4985

Back to top

Back to the top

Life with a Honda Civic: Month 4

Tyre pressure japes with the Civic – 18 October 2017

The Civic’s let me down. Well, sort of, and not, I should add, in any major way.

Rather, the tyre pressure warning light pinged on just as I joined the M25. It prompted a slow 40-mile trudge to the next service station, where the tyre gauge then showed nothing to be wrong.

The light has subsequently gone out of its own (pardon the pun) accord.

Mileage: 3185

Getting to grips with the Civic’s design – 20 September 2017

Like or loathe the look of our Civic’s edgy styling, the car certainly has its benefits in other areas.

I’ve mentioned before how the lower stance has improved its dynamics and how the sporty driving position ups the feel-good factor inside.

So does the steering: it’s well weighted and geared (with a variable ratio, in fact, but not done so sharply that you’d notice) at a quick 2.14 turns from lock to lock, despite which its turning circle is a respectable 11m.

Back to top

I approve of that and also of its handling, which borders on fun – and if its road-holding is no better than you might expect of a car wearing Michelin Primacy 3 tyres (even in such a generous size as our 235/45 R17s), at least the whole driving experience feels like it’s been engineered by someone who gives a damn.

Back to top

Now, I would be tempted to end this report there were I not professionally obliged to report on all the things, good or bad, that I might dig up during my tenure of this car.

So I’m afraid I’ll have to list some faults that I don’t think will contradict my opening statement.

If I wholeheartedly recommend this Civic as a car to drive and to own – it has been trouble-free so far, unsurprisingly – I have to point out an area in which it disappoints considerably: the infotainment system is terrible.

It’s not just the 7.0in screen, prone to picking up glare. It’s not just the inadequacies of the touchscreen, which often needs a second prod before stirring itself into dreadfully slow action, or the shortcut icons down one side of it, hard to locate and hit, or the awful Fisher-Price graphics.

No, the single worst thing is the utterly unintuitive nature of its operation. More than once, I’ve lost the screen that lists your radio station options, and it has taken me days to find it again.

I’m still not sure how I did it. All I know is the misery of being subjected to someone else’s choice of station for days.

To be honest, finding things within the sub-menus is such a faff that I no longer bother. I can find the ‘Info’ screen that tells me how many miles per gallon I’m doing over the course of a journey, and I have learnt how to programme the sat-nav; that’s relatively easy.

Back to top

The only good thing I can say about it is it’s slightly better in its responses than I remember the similar set-up being in my Honda Jazz long-term test car.

Don’t worry, though. my largely unloved Unlike the Jazz, the rest of this car’s great. I wish it were a fraction more economical, but that is perhaps an inevitable result of having a fairly weeny 1.0-litre engine in a large-ish car.

Drive it with any vigour and you’ll see as low as 25mpg. However, overall I’m getting 38.6mpg, and on one 60-mile journey from Surrey to Kent via a traffic-laden M25 it achieved 47.1mpg.

I now have just enough space left to tell you that the door mirrors don’t automatically fold in when you stop and the positioning of the sockets for mobile devices annoys me.

Oh, and a wine bottle in the central bin gets in the way of your gearchanging arm.

Mileage: 2495

True ‘eco’ benefit or merely a con? – 09 August 2017

The Civic has one of those Econ buttons that, as far as I can work out, does absolutely nothing other than illuminate an icon on the instrument panel.

I’m told that it actually softens the throttle response and limits the air-con to achieve better fuel economy, but my figures seem to be the same whether the button is on or not.

Back to top

I’m averaging a reasonable 38.6mpg overall.

Mileage: 2250

Back to the top

Life with a Honda Civic: Month 2

Proving to be the perfect urbanite – 26 July 2017

The Civic is agile, easy to drive and a useful tool in the urban nip and tuck, as a recent trip to central London proved.

But when it came to parking in a tight space on a Kensington street, I was glad that our car has a standard-issue rear-view camera, because that swooping roofline and the bar that dissects the back window do limit its rear visibility.

Mileage: 1995

Back to top

The Civic’s beauty is in the eyes of its beholder – 05 July 2017

The Civic is proving popular here. The older people in the office want to borrow it for its practicality and fuel economy (40mpg-plus on longer runs) and the younger ones because it looks a little bit like the Type R.

In fact, opinion is divided pretty much 50/50 on the question of the car’s looks. I freely admit to being a convert.

When I first saw it, I thought it was so ugly that it made me weep, but I’ve grown to like our car’s fruity red bodywork and menacing black alloy wheels, and I love the length of its wheelbase and how low the car is, two factors that must contribute towards its impressive dynamics.

What has caused most people to reel in surprise is when they’re told that underneath its bonnet is a mere 1.0-litre three-cylinder engine.

Back to top

The same goes for the Civic saloons, coupés, estates and MPVs, the Civic having always been nothing if not versatile. More often than not they showed up their contemporaneous rivals for the dullards they usually were.

It all started with the very first Civic, which was launched in 1972 and by 1975 had an engine (the admirable CVCC) producing such low emissions that it shook the entire US motor industry to the core and continued in a double-wishboned frenzy right up until Honda produced a spacious but distinctly unsexy MPV-style model when the Civic reached its seventh generation in the year 2000.

This version dispensed with the neat double-wishbone front suspension, its successor introducing a torsion beam rear axle into the equation, from which point the car – despite its sporting variants and its quirky styling touches – was never quite the same again.

What is now the tenth-gen Civic is now completely new: longer, lower, wider and stiffer than the car it replaces, with an all-new platform, fully independent rear suspension and the promise – with help from its new turbocharged engines – of bringing back some dynamic finesse.

And then there’s the styling – my word, the styling. Consigned to history is the unorthodox and slightly divisive look of the past two generations to be replaced by something that’s, er, unorthodox and slightly divisive.

Back to top

If this new one is not exactly handsome, or even cohesive, it at least has an energy to its busy lines that warrants your attention. It brings to mind the designer Raymond Loewy’s maxim that to sell something familiar you must make it surprising, and to sell something surprising make it familiar.

More to the point, though, I think as a result of all these changes it’s now possible for a keen motorist to get a little worked up by a Civic all over again, and that’s why I’ve chosen to run one.

The one I’ve actually snapped up for our long-term fleet is a 1.0 VTEC SR version.

Our early drives of the Civic indicated that this new 127bhp 1.0-litre turbocharged triple had the edge on the more powerful 1.5-litre four when it came to driver appeal.

On paper, performance seems respectable, if not exactly thrilling, for something with such a small engine capacity, with 0-62mph listed at 10.9secs and a top speed of 127mph. More impressive, perhaps, are its official 55.4mpg and its respectable CO2 emissions of 117g/km.

 

Back to top
Add a comment…