From £15,760
Honda is ready to play the downsizing card against Ford Focus Ecoboost and the latest Vauxhall Astra with a 1.0-litre Civic
Matt Burt
27 October 2015

What is it?

The new Honda Civic is due in 2017 - and the Japanese manufacturer knows that its VW Golf and Ford Focus rival needs to offer smoother, punchier and more efficient petrol engines to keep up with those rivals and cars like the latest Vauxhall Astra. Downsizing is king in the family hatchback class, it seems.

We already know that the car will get a 1.5-litre four-cylinder turbocharged engine, but now Honda has announced that the next generation of Civic will also be offered with a turbocharged 1.0-litre three-cylinder motor - and given us an early chance to try it.

The baby triple - an all-new, all-aluminium design with no balancer shaft and intake VTEC - is designed to replace the normally aspirated four-cylinder 1.8-litre petrol in the Civic’s line-up. It offers 127bhp and 148lb ft of torque, but should slash the car’s fuel consumption and CO2 emissions. Honda is aiming for 99g/km on versions with a manual transmission.

What's it like?

Our test drive took place at Honda’s R&D centre - and in an existing Civic fitted with the new engine, mated to a six-speed manual gearbox. The motor doesn’t quite have the oomph to make the car feel particularly rapid - it doesn't feel like it has 127bhp on tap, it must be said - but enough of that torque is present low down in the rev range to allow for fairly relaxed and sensible progress.

Drivers of the 1.8 will certainly notice how the turbo gives a bit more low shove in fifth and sixth gears on motorways. It's not particularly keen to rev out, though; Honda had taped an artificial redline of 5700rpm to the steering wheel to keep us in check, but in truth it felt done and dusted long before that figure came into view.

Refinement? It’s probably a tad unfair to say this, given that our car was a late prototype and an existing Civic, but it definitely sounded a bit more gruff than Ford’s Ecoboost - which manages to sound so much more sophisticated than a 1.0 triple when it’s in the Focus.

There’s not a huge amount of vibration through the pedals or seat, but Honda’s NVH engineers are going to have to work hard to make sure the next generation of Civic does a better job of suppressing that unmistakeable three-cylinder thrum, particularly at a motorway cruise, where it was too noticeable at the 3000rpm that was required for 80mph.

Should I buy one?

You can’t; you won’t be able to get this engine in the current Civic at all, in fact. When it does arrive in the next generation of the car it should have appeal to Civic devotees craving a bit more bottom-end torque than the normally-aspirated 1.8-litre units they’ve been used to. They should see real benefits in fuel economy and running costs.

Everyone else’s reaction will depend as much on how many of the existing Civic’s foibles have been ironed out - and on how good a job the new one does on making the new engine seem sophisticated and refined as well as capable and efficient. The basics are there, then, but plenty of hard work remains.

Honda Civic 1.0 prototype

Back to top

Location Tochigi, Japan; On sale 2017; Price From £16,000 (est); Engine 3cyls, 1.0 litre, petrol; Power 127bhp; Torque 148lb ft; Economy 66mpg (est); CO2 emissions 99g/km (est)

Join the debate

Comments
13
Add a comment…
si73 27 October 2015

Mazda

I was hoping honda would go the same way as mazda with high compression naturally aspirated engines, I personally prefer naturally aspirated over turbo charged and always thought a small capacity vtec would be great fun, being able to use the full rev range without losing your licence. I find it more satisfying using the revs for performance rather than riding a wave of torque and short shifting to stay in the torque band, since diesels have become the norm its seen as a negative trait to change down gears to provide the correct rev range for acceleration to allow an overtake, this to me is all part of the fun, rather than just staying in top gear, changing down with a blip of the throttle to balance the revs and then using the rev range to extract the power is great fun and as such I would rather the current 1.8 over a 1.0t, mazdas 1.5 and 2.0 seem very impressive as they give good performance with good co2 emissions for cheaper car tax.
Andrew 61 27 October 2015

Is this engine a development

Is this engine a development of the 1.5 t ? you might have thought the 1.5 would have been developed with this triple in mind. That would give an 1125cc capacity. Or has there been bore/stroke changes as well as a cylinder removed ?
winniethewoo 27 October 2015

Perhaps the 1l turbo engine

Perhaps the 1l turbo engine will make more sense mated to a hybrid drive train? Volvo are getting 49g/km out of their XC90 T8 hybrid. All this is being driven by EU regs after all. I am not surprised the real world economy isn't very good. If you want to move a 1000kg car 30mph, the energy required to do it will be the same no matter what you have under the bonnet. The official tests will never be overhauled properly because of government lobbying by the car industry. What is needed is an independent organisation like NCAP for emissions rather than crash safety.