From £18,4758
Honda has thrown the kitchen sink at the all-new Civic - and it shows

Our Verdict

Honda Civic review hero front

Honda’s 10th-generation Civic hatchback goes global — but is that good news?

Nic Cackett
30 January 2017
2017 Honda Civic 1.0 i-VTEC Turbo SR

What is it?

The old Honda Civic - that is to say, the current one - was classic Honda. Conceived the other side of the 2008 global crash and then torn up in the aftermath, the five-door model arrived in Europe virtually pre-wrapped in also-ran status thanks to, in no particular order, its oddball looks, mediocre interior and an engine line-up which relegated petrol buyers to a naturally aspirated motor that dated like cottage cheese.

A big state-of-play fix was required, so Honda returned to the drawing board with the kind of relish that has resulted in something wholly new and enhanced. Thus the old regimen of gently reshaping the Civic for the peculiarities of a different region has been wisely swept aside, and instead Honda has pooled its global resources and enacted what it calls the single largest development programme in the firm’s 70-year history.

Many things have happened, then, but at the crux of them lie some takeaway facts. Firstly, that the Civic has a more sophisticated multi-link rear axle where a humble twist beam previously lived. Second, there’s a new range of petrol engines, which are turbocharged for your pleasure and include the kind of cutting-edge, tiny-capacity three-pot that’s about to take the diesel-unfriendly world by storm, and third, there’s a new look and an overhauled cabin.


Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

The reason for the fresh look is because there’s an all-new platform, which is not only wider and significantly longer than that of the last model but also lower. Lower, naturally, is better, for centre of gravity, for your butt cheek-to-road measurement and to look at from afar. There has also been a commensurate toughening of the new-fangled unibody – by 52% in torsional rigidity and, partly thanks also to the new rear axle, a whopping 88% in lateral stiffness.

Those are wantonly large, dynamic-altering numbers, and that’s rather obviously Honda’s plan: to drive better, more comfortably and more engagingly than the immediate opposition. Even more heartening, the opposition is emphatically European: the new Civic may be global, but the benchmark is set by Europe’s premier C-segment, where Honda has correctly judged the world’s finest five-door examples to endure.

Here, we're driving the 127bhp 1.0 i-VTEC Turbo.

What's it like?

It’s probably fair to say that impeccable C-segment styling – of the sort that Volkswagen, Vauxhall, Seat and Ford now glibly turn in every lifecycle – remains a nut left high on the tree for Honda still to crack. The Civic’s designer is Japanese, and the design influences of his homeland are the salient ones here. That means the car is busy with lines and features and veneers – and not entirely at ease with any of them.

Nevertheless, it is possibly less troubling in the flesh than on paper, and – I think – modestly better looking than the model that preceded it. Inside, there’s no modesty about it: the new Civic is dramatically superior, even allowing for the laboured Honda Connect infotainment system. Mainly that’s because the old layout was peculiar and the latest one isn’t, but beyond that it's sturdily good looking, generally well thought out and eminently durable in the predominantly plastic way that Honda long ago made its own.

With the fuel tank now moved aft (it was under the front seats in the old model), the advantage of sitting 34mm lower can hardly be overstated either, and while the rear has hardly swollen to class-leading size, the benefit to back seat passengers of a longer wheelbase is appreciable, too.

The way the Civic now drives is similarly deserving of praise. The virtues of its myriad hardware changes are manifested in an enduring sense of real composure, and it's; a characteristic that assimilates everything from the ride quality to the unflappable handling. The passive suspension is no less impressive than the adaptive set-up we tried in prototype format last year, with bump absorption is of a consistently high standard, and – on Spanish roads – the car doesn’t want for wheel control, even when upset under cornering loads.

This helps to make the Civic’s basic poise a tangible asset. Better managing the transition between yaw moment, lateral g and body roll was a specific Honda target, and it has duly rendered a car confidently in control of its faculties. Granted, the longer, wider footprint has certainly not upgraded any lingering sense of verve – this is innocuously balanced front-drive handling, with a slightly syrupy steering feel to match – but the Civic’s precision and overriding sense of assurance make for easy bedfellows.

Likewise the new 1.0-litre motor, which dependably fulfills the now familiar tiny three-pot brief. Honda, as its long heritage stipulates, takes the production of no new engine lightly. With no alternative to forced induction now available, the firm has responded by making its mono scroll turbocharger small and light enough not to overtly strangle the VTEC function toiling away elsewhere, and the result keeps any idea of variance in the delivery well distant from the driver. This is a blown triple in its most modern vogue: usable, quick enough, quiet enough and parsimonious by design. 

Should I buy one?

So long in the tooth and down in the mouth was the outgoing petrol-powered Civic that its replacement could hardly fail to improve on its appeal, yet that doesn’t detract from the commendable job done here. Honda reportedly spent a third of its total R&D budget on turning the model around, and it shows in the standard of the product already emerging from the Swindon plant (the exclusive manufacturer of the five-door variant). True enough, in its comfort, carefulness and congruity, this is a thoroughly mature, middle-of-the-road prospect. But among such options, the Civic ranks very highly indeed. 

Honda Civic 1.0 i-VTEC Turbo SR

Location Spain; On sale March; Price £20,180; Engine 3 cyls, 988cc, turbo, petrol; Power 127bhp at 5500rpm; Torque 148lb ft at 2250rpm; Gearbox 6-spd manual; Kerb weight 1348kg; 0-62mph 10.9sec; Top speed 126mph; Economy 55.4mpg (combined); CO2/tax band 117g/km, 20%; Rivals Seat Leon, Ford Focus, Vauxhall Astra

Join the debate


30 January 2017
1) What is 'Earth Dreams Technology'?

2) How is the steering 'syrupy'?

3) Does anyone who buys one of these things (and the 95% of the rest of this 'car segment' (more buzz words)) really care about 'yaw moment' and 'lateral G'???

Will your parents fit in the back, is it comfortable for the kids, can you easily fit a few planters of Geraniums in the boot, what's the fuel economy like, will it be reliable, is the ride comfortable and is it easy to park? Oh, and can we afford it?

End of.

30 January 2017
I agree mate. These motoring journos are so wide of the mark when it comes to placing importance on the needs of the buyer. "Oh but we're a magazine for enthusiasts, these things matter" they say. Does that mean that because I don't care for speeding on an A road on the handling limit that I'm not an enthusiast?

30 January 2017
First two comments are ridiculous. The only significant omission here is real-world fuel economy, which is probably difficult to measure on these kind of launch events anyhow. I'm sure a future UK road test will address it. As for the rest, it was interesting and informative. I still think it's hideous, but it sounds like it very much deserves consideration. A car's dynamics are not just relevant when travelling flat out you know.

30 January 2017
I can see the point to an extent but what use is specialist journalism without subjectivity. Do these same people asking these questions read autocar? doubtful - autoexpress maybe, what car perhaps but autocar .. nah. I found the article pretty good at getting to the sort of details im interested in, although ill never be a customer. Surely in a competitive segment most people could safely assume it will hold geraniums, transport mum and dad and be generally quite practical. If thats all the article was going to talk about though, id be questioning my choice of reading material.

31 January 2017
Yes it probably does

30 January 2017
I notice the Rivals list didn't include the obvious Golf, mustn't upset our new favourites!

30 January 2017
The front end reminds me of a manga character sporting a pair of eye patches. As for the rear it's just a convoluted mess.

You can do better than this Honda.

30 January 2017
I cant actually understand this piece.

30 January 2017
This writer seems to provoke the haters for some reason. I like his writing - distinctive and knowledgeable. It's good to read a motoring review which isn't dumbed down or condescending e.g. 'Julie liked the Honda's sporty drive but doesn't like the lack of contrast colour options for the roof.'

30 January 2017
scrap wrote:

This writer seems to provoke the haters for some reason. I like his writing - distinctive and knowledgeable. It's good to read a motoring review which isn't dumbed down or condescending e.g. 'Julie liked the Honda's sporty drive but doesn't like the lack of contrast colour options for the roof.'

I think his writing divides opinion like the styling of this Honda.
I actually like the car. Hate his writing however


Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week