From £35,8359
The latest BMW 5 Series is arguably the most complete executive car out there, as long as you spec it correctly

Our Verdict

BMW 5 Series

The BMW 5 Series has been the go-to mid-sized executive saloon, and G30 generation brings 7 Series luxury limo quality to the class, but is it still the best?

  • First Drive

    BMW 5 Series long-term review

    The BMW 5 Series is top of the mid-exec pack, but is there still room for a diesel saloon in everyday family life? We found out over seven months
  • First Drive

    BMW 5 Series M550i 2017 review

    The all-paw M550i is a fast, effortless mile-muncher, but there's a reason why it won't be sold in the UK

What is it?

Don’t worry, we haven’t gone blind. While the side gills, imposing front grille and conservative profile might scream 7 Series, this is in fact the latest 5 Series. We have already published a couple of drives covering six-cylinder petrol and diesel variants, but it’s the linchpin of the range we’re covering here - the 520d.

A quick flick through the spec sheet reveals that while the 5 Series might sit on an all-new platform, its 2.0-litre diesel engine is the same 1995cc lump that sits in everything from the Mini Cooper D upwards. In the 520d, it produces 188bhp - enough for brisk performance - and is mated as standard to an eight-speed ZF automatic gearbox.

More interestingly, there’s the option of four-wheel steering (dubbed Integral Active Steering, costing £995) to improve manoeuvrability at low speeds, and stability as the pace ramps up. It’s also possible to have all four wheels driving should you want the added traction of BMW's xDrive system, at the cost of £2000.

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

What's it like?

Explaining how the 5 Series copes with UK roads is a little trickier than you might expect. Opt for an M Sport car on 19in wheels and non-adaptive suspension, and you might be more than a little disappointed, because it'll pick up on most of the surface imperfections you'll find on a typically tortured stretch of British blacktop.

The trick is to avoid the temptation of speccing wheelarch-filling rims, and stick to 17in or at most 18in wheels. Combine the thicker sidewalls these bring with the optional £985 adaptive dampers, and you suddenly have a car that all but floats down the road when left in Comfort mode.

Where the 5 Series really impresses is in its ability to combine this fantastically comfortable ride with good body control. Drive a Mercedes-Benz E-Class and you’ll notice plenty of wallow and roll instead of the upright stance and tight damping of the BMW.

That’s not to say it’s perfect; a Jaguar XF responds even more keenly, and filters far more feel up from the front tyres. In comparison, the 5 Series has slower and less feelsome steering, although it does make for more relaxed progress when you’re not going for it, and it's precise enough to allow you to place the nose of the car very accurately. BMW being BMW has also delivered 50/50 weight distribution, leading to well-balanced handling.

As for the engine, it may not be the newest unit out there, but it’s certainly effective. Performance is strong enough for full-throttle to rarely be required and BMW’s mastery of the eight-speed ZF auto 'box continues. Shifts are smooth when they should be and swift when you start playing with the manual mode.

Refinement is impressive, too; it isn’t quite as hushed and vibration-free as the equivalent Audi A6, but it manages to be quieter than the E-Class and XF during normal use. Yes, it gets a bit coarser when you’re pushing on, but what four-cylinder diesel engine doesn’t?

Inside, things don’t look too different at first glance. The layout is familiar enough, but there have been plenty of detail changes including the raising of the infotainment screen, addition of a fully digital instrument display and a wholesale lift in material quality.

It’s that good that it’s time for a cliché alert: it really does feel like a miniature 7 Series. You’ll be looking a very long time before you see anything approaching a hard surface, the switchgear feels delightfully precise and all the key touch points feel top-notch. This is how executive interiors should be done.

It’s a shame then, that rear seat space isn’t quite as generous as in some rivals. It’s not that it’s pokey, but an E-Class or Volvo S90 would have a good lot more leg room. If you’re likely to carry particularly tall rear passengers, it’s something that's worth considering.

Should I buy one?

If you’re after the best-handling executive saloon out there, then the 5 Series probably isn’t for you. Yes, it’s exceedingly good, but a Jaguar XF is a bit more involving and agile.

If we’re honest, though, most cars of this type won’t be spending much of their time on motoring nirvana roads. If anything, it’ll be the exact opposite - the hellish reality of our crowded motorway network. Here, the 5 Series really appeals in its ability to play the cosseting luxury barge to a tee, while also providing enough engagement to keep a keen driver entertained on their favourite stretch of Tarmac. Factor in the top-quality interior, and this is the most-rounded executive saloon currently on sale.

2017 BMW 5 Series 520d

Location Middlesex; On sale Now; Price £36,205; Engine 1995cc 4 cylinder, turbocharged, diesel; Power 188bhp at 4000rpm; Torque 295lb ft at 1750rpm; Gearbox Eight-speed, automatic; Kerb weight 1615kg; 0-62mph 7.5secs; Top speed 146mph; Economy 68.1mpg CO2/tax band 108g/km, 21%; Rivals Mercedes-Benz E-Class E 220 d, Jaguar XF 2.0d

Join the debate

Comments
51

13 February 2017
Why anyone would pick the XF over this I do not know.

13 February 2017
robhardyuk wrote:

Why anyone would pick the XF over this I do not know.

I agree.......that is aside from probably being superior to the XF in just about every conceivable way, bar subjective ones.

13 February 2017
robhardyuk wrote:

Why anyone would pick the XF over this I do not know.

Why wouldn't they? The XF appears in the reviews to be a sportier driving and better looking. Maybe some people would prefer that as it appears in this article the 5 series has lost its driving appeal. Also, the XF supports the local economy and made here, that may appeal to some people as well as the Jag badge.

13 February 2017
Jimbbobw1977 wrote:
robhardyuk wrote:

Why anyone would pick the XF over this I do not know.

Why wouldn't they? The XF appears in the reviews to be a sportier driving and better looking. Maybe some people would prefer that as it appears in this article the 5 series has lost its driving appeal. Also, the XF supports the local economy and made here, that may appeal to some people as well as the Jag badge.

Whether the XF is better looking is entirely subjective, I'd also argue the 5 has gained driver appeal by not pandering to the motoring press and their bizarre view that everything and everyone should drive like a sports car. Perhaps when Jaguar can can offer a package and product line up as thorough as BMW's it can call the XF a true competitor to BMW. Until it can do that, Jaguar and JLR will remain the bit players they currently are.

13 February 2017
If you want a better drive, the XF seems to be more of your thing.
If you want luxury in this class, the E-class does it better.

It's a jack of all trades but master of none. Which normally makes things class leading (Golf anyone?) but at this price range, you have to be able to do everything, and the 520d can't.

13 February 2017
I picked an XF because it rode and handled better than the (at the time) equivalent 535d. I don't see anything in this review which would change that with the new one. I'm sure the new 5 series has a lovely interior, infotainment system and trim plastics; but having to spec 17" rims to get a decent ride is a big no.

13 February 2017
I think this is a very accomplished design, not something that can be said of most current BMWs, and far better resolved than the awkward 3 series with its odd proportions, tall bonnet (as seen from the side), an appalling interior etc.

13 February 2017
I honestly struggle to tell the difference between 3, 5 and 7 series nowadays. All are identical in looks and surprisingly not too dissimilar in size!

13 February 2017
80sXS Can't agree more with you .

The common dashboard layout /look bores the pants off me.

13 February 2017
vrskeith wrote:

80sXS Can't agree more with you .

The common dashboard layout /look bores the pants off me.

Yes, I agree. But I think sometimes comfort and function over design and quality is what people want. Im sure the materials will be better than either the 1,2,3 or 4 Series.

But I reckon they have pretty much nailed this car, with the exception of some interior trim.

Pages

Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week