From £13,420
Base A3 soft-top is a good car in need of a better engine

Our Verdict

Audi A3

Third generation Audi A3 has been given a mild facelift, more equipment, some new engines, a new hot model, but is the three-door version the cream of the premium hatch crop?

  • First Drive

    Audi A3 1.6 TDI Sport first drive review

    Most frugal model in the Audi A3 range thrills with impressive economy, but it lacks dynamic sparkle
  • First Drive

    Audi A3 2.0 TDI Sport

    Our first drive of the new Audi A3 in the UK has revealed it to be a good, capable companion if slightly lacking in ambition
18 November 2008

What is it?

This is the Audi A3 1.9 TDI cabriolet, the most frugal way to enjoy the open air in an Audi. The A3 1.9 TDI is the entry point into the A3 cabrio range and will return an average of 55.4mpg.

Top-down motoring can be achieved in just nine seconds, and there’s enough room for four adults too.

What’s it like?

As the cheapest diesel A3 cabriolet in the range, the A3 1.9 TDI compares favourably to pricier models, until you realise the low price is at the expense of a decent powerplant.

The direct-injection engine feels and sounds unrefined compared to its common-rail brethren, and the clattery diesel thrum is intrusive whether the fabric roof is up or down.

The 145kg of additional weight over the 1.9-litre TDI A3 hatch is also a bit of a strain for the 103bhp motor – it feels substantially underpowered. Once in its stride, the A3 does glide elegantly over the road, though. The ride is softly sprung and comfortable, without comprising the steering and body control.

Should I buy one?

If you’re looking for an economical, spacious four-seat cabriolet then the entry-level diesel A3 returns all the right figures. If, however, you’re not governed by numbers you would do better to look further up the range to the more well rounded and powerful common-rail 2.0-litre TDI. Cabin quality is a real plus, even in the most basic trim, but the gruffness of the direct-injection engine distracts you from an otherwise pleasant car.

George Barrow

Join the debate

Comments
6

18 November 2008

Like the base 1.6 Petrol, this is an engine for people who cant actually afford this car. Why get a good looking convertible, and then saddle it with an awful, dated, coarse engine which dates back to the 90's? Madness.

18 November 2008

[quote Quattro369]Why get a good looking convertible,[/quote]

It isn't. It starts off promisingly but turns into a skip beyond the windscreen. And they forgot to cover in around the hood frame. Cheapskates.

PaulJ

19 November 2008

[quote Quattro369]Like the base 1.6 Petrol, this is an engine for people who cant actually afford this car. [/quote]

Probably to a certain extent but it is more likely a car for people that aren't interested in driving and predominantly spend time in a city, such as London, posing.

What is perplexing to me, why saddle it with such an aurally lousy engine. The 1.6 petrol, fine. It may be slow but at least it's quiet. What joy can be got from sitting in traffic with the roof down and an industrial sound track playing in the back ground.

 

 

It's all about the twisties........

19 November 2008

[quote Quattro369]Why get a good looking convertible, and then saddle it with an awful, dated, coarse engine which dates back to the 90's? Madness.[/quote]

Because you can?

20 November 2008

[quote Paul J]It starts off promisingly but turns into a skip beyond the windscreen.[/quote]

You're too kind. In fact, the Audi nose looks like a person who has had a door opened with great force into their face. Flattened and ugly, like a boxer dog. But yes, beyond the windscreen it does indeed turn into a skip. A typically dumpy looking Audi skip. And in this guise, a dumpy looking skip that sounds like a cement mixer.

This is a car for myopic non-drivers. Especially in white, it's the XR3i Cabriolet for the new century. Me - I'd rather have an MX5.

20 November 2008

[quote Dan McNeil]You're too kind[/quote]

I was trying to offer them some crumbs of comfort and encouragement, but on reflection you're right, I am being too kind. You have to be cruel to be kind, and your concrete mixer comparison is probably more accurate than my skip.

PaulJ

Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

  • Lexus LC500
    Car review
    20 October 2017
    Futuristic Lexus LC coupé mixes the latest technology with an old-school atmospheric V8
  • Maserati Levante S GranSport
    First Drive
    20 October 2017
    Get ready to trade in your diesels: Maserati’s luxury SUV finally gets the engine it’s always needed
  • Jaguar XF Sportbrake TDV6
    First Drive
    19 October 2017
    The handsome Jaguar XF Sportbrake exhibits all the hallmarks that makes the saloon great, and with the silky smooth diesel V6 makes it a compelling choice
  • Volkswagen T-Roc TDI
    First Drive
    19 October 2017
    Volkswagen's new compact crossover has the looks, the engineering and the build quality to be a resounding success, but not with this diesel engine
  • BMW M550i
    First Drive
    19 October 2017
    The all-paw M550i is a fast, effortless mile-muncher, but there's a reason why it won't be sold in the UK