Currently reading: Kia Niro long-term test review: first report
A crossover with a petrol-electric powertrain ought to be a recipe for success. We’ve got nine months to find out if that’s the case with Kia’s first dedicated hybrid
Darren Moss
News
4 mins read
10 April 2017

One of my favourite cars to live with has been a Nissan Qashqai.

For six months in 2013-2014, I was the keeper of this most practical of crossovers. And I loved it. The Qashqai did everything we asked of it, and more, without once batting an eyelid. It was almost perfect – but what would such a package be like with a hybrid powertrain instead of the torquey diesel engines favoured by UK buyers? Surely, it would be the ideal combination of practicality and low running costs? Well, I’ve got the chance to find out with this Kia Niro.

This is new territory for Kia. For years, it has watched the slow uptake of hybrid and electric cars in the UK, waiting to dip its toe into what is becoming an important segment. With the launch of sister brand Hyundai’s Ioniq, the timing seemed right. Kia has taken the Ioniq’s platform and powertrain – in regular hybrid form only, rather than the plug-in versions, for now – and put it into a very on-trend crossover body.

On paper, it seems to be a smart move: a crossover with space for the family and their luggage combined with fuel economy that can rival the most frugal diesels but with lower running costs. What’s more, for now, a CO2 output of 101g/km means it will cost you nothing to tax in the first year and just £10 thereafter.

It’s worth noting, too, that although the Niro’s hybrid package is no longer a new phenomenon, it is new to Kia. It took Toyota several iterations of the Prius to finally build a hybrid that feels normal to drive, so Kia has to play catch-up, and quickly.

With a starting price of £21,295, the Niro is more expensive than many other cars of this size – and significantly pricier than titans of this class like the Qashqai. However, it’s £2300 cheaper than a Prius.

You do get plenty of standard equipment for that price. Every Niro comes with dual-zone climate control, automatic lights, cruise control and a lane keeping system.

Our upper-range 3 version of the Niro may not be the one that most owners will choose, but it’s a good opportunity to sample a wider array of the Niro’s kit. Our car is fitted with luxuries such as heated seats and steering wheel, an 8.0in touchscreen infotainment system with sat-nav, black leather upholstery, front and rear parking sensors, a reversing camera and wireless phone charger. In fact, the only option fitted to our car is metallic paint.

Powering it is a 1.6-litre petrol engine, running on the more frugal Atkinson cycle, and a small electric motor. For the most part, it’s the petrol engine that provides power, with the electric motor cutting in to provide instant torque from a standing start, or to supplement the engine at cruising speeds.

Like most hybrids, the Niro uses a lithium ion battery pack to store electricity, but whereas other cars have to sacrifice boot space to hide the pack, the Niro’s is so power dense that it’s compact enough to sit under the rear seats. That means there’s a very usable 427-litre load capacity with the rear bench in place – and 1425 litres with it folded flat. In both cases, that’s slightly less than in a Qashqai, but it’s more than enough for two suitcases or a big weekly shop.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Find an Autocar review

Read our review

Car review
Kia Niro

Kia taps into the zeitgeist with an all-new hybrid compact crossover, but conventional models like the Nissan Qashqai, Renault Kadjar and Honda HR-V will take some beating

Back to top

Our first impressions of the Niro, though, have been mixed. The car shifts seamlessly between electric and engine power and the six-speed dual-clutch automatic gearbox works better than the CVTs you’ll find in most other hybrids – but the throttle response is loose and leaves the driver feeling disconnected. In fact, there’s very little in the way of the fun driving style that Kia has promised Niro owners.

Our car arrived with just 195 miles on the clock, so some bedding in will be required before we can judge fuel economy with any clarity. Kia claims 64.2mpg combined, but so far we’re seeing around 42mpg.

When we road tested the Niro, this was one of our sore points, because its real-world fuel economy wasn’t breathtaking and its subdued driving style left us cold. Most SUV buyers choose diesel engines for their efficiency and more accessible torque, so if its fuel economy doesn’t improve, the Niro could find itself tripping up at the first hurdle.

The Niro has a tough task ahead as we ask it to try to at least match the ownership experience delivered by the Qashqai – a car that passed almost every test we threw at it with flying colours. But on the face of it, the hybrid Kia has the tools it needs to get the job done. We’ll be putting the Niro through a similar regimen to that successfully faced by the Qashqai, so it’ll be a fair comparison. Can it rise to the challenge? We’ve got the next nine months to find out.

KIA NIRO 1.6 GDI HEV 3

Price new £24,695 Price as tested £25,240 Options Metallic paint £545 Economy 42.0mpg Faults None Expenses None

Join the debate

Comments
11
Add a comment…
AlanW55 25 May 2017

MPG

I've done 900 miles in my Niro and am averaging 56mpg. I don't push it hard, but easily keep up with mainstream traffic, and very occasionally have a quick thrash in Sport mode. Your reviewer must have a very heavy right foot.......
The Apprentice 10 April 2017

Poor thing, a whole

Poor thing, a whole technology condemned on being misunderstood in its purpose and a one off testers rough economy on the thrash back from the dealers! - Its not about economy anyway, its about emissions and tax! - half of new cars are sold to companies/fleets so it matter! (even if it doesn't to Autocar and its honourable readers). The hybrid (and remember its not a plug-in) has the advantage of having an inherently under-powered engine for steady cruising boosted by a battery/motor like a virtual turbo when more go is needed. This 'turbo' is largely 'free' to run as it uses surplus energy from the engine or regeneration braking kept in a battery. Hence the mean CO2 drops, especially as the test course is so undemanding. Its not so long ago petrol cars of any size meant 30mpg. If this can (as in other peoples hands) do 60mpg then its pretty good I say. If it can put £100+ tax a month in your pocket at the same time, even better.
Will86 10 April 2017

42mpg is not a good start

It would help though if the author could note what sort of driving has given rise to that figure. If the car has been trawling the motorway at 80mph then I'm not surprised, but if it has been doing more local work where the hybrid should excel, then that's poor even for a brand new car in its run in period. I wonder how the Niro will fair when it is subjected to the new fuel economy tests. All told the Niro seems a bit of a disappointment. I thought a hybrid crossover would suit my lifestyle and driving needs, but it uses more fuel and has a smaller boot than my Civic. Plus by all accounts it not much to drive either.

Find an Autocar car review