The Peugeot RCZ is a radical departure for Peugeot, from its looks and emphasis on handling through to the fact that it is the first Peugeot production car not to have a '0' in its name.
Beneath the skin you'll find 308 architecture, suspension and running gear. All heavily modified, of course - springs dampers, braces, track width and so on are all changed.
Exclusive Peugeot RCZ v Audi TT v VW Scirocco v Renaultsport Megane 250 Cup pictures
Under the hood of our example is a 1.6-litre turbocharged engine producing 154bhp. It costs £22,750.
We're pitting it against the cheapest Audi TT, the front-drive 197bhp 2.0T FSI (£26,370), the VW Scirocco GT 2.0 TSI (£23,615) and Renaultsport's Megane 250 Cup (£23,160).
Inside the cars
The RCZ, inevitably, draws its interior from the 308's, so the architecture is similar inside. There are just enough highlights and details to make it feel more special than a regular hatch.
There's some lovely leather work in places, but that contrasts heavily with some cheaper plastics. The rear seats are also little more than foam padding on a rear bulkhead that can be folded down to increase boot volume. Headroom is tight and the squab so short that child seats will be difficult to fit.
That said, it's better than the TT, in which access and headroom are even worse. Despite this, the Audi is arguably the more practical of the two. It has a hatch rather than a separate boot and those rear chairs split and fold.
Both look miserable compared with the Scirocco, whose separate rear seats are narrow and tightly sculpted but are also big enough for two adults to sit behind two adults. The seats split and fold and its only a shame the interior ambiance and perceived quality trail that of the TT.
The Renault is clean and neatly designed up front, and two adults could squeeze in the back, though it's relatively claustrophobic.
At the wheel
Along with the Scirocco, the TT shares the best driving position, though the RCZ's is fine too, and the Renault is beyond serious criticism.
Ride comfort is subjective, as one man's comfortably soft is another's dreadfully wallowy. Suffice to say none of these cars is harsh.
The Peugeot displays occasional bump-thump through an otherwise isolated ride of middling firmness, while the Scirocco is firmer and more tightly controlled but no less comfortable.
The base TT rides entirely decently, but it can't pull off the trick of the Scirocco or the Megane and couple strong abilities in both primary ride and secondary ride.
The TT starts to run out of ideas on an interesting road: it has enough power, but the steering is overly light and has no discernible feel at all.
Join the debate
Add your comment
Re: Peugeot RCZ v its rivals
Uuum,,,. if the Megane isn't a proper coupe (which I agree with) how can the Scirocco be classed as one, as in profile they are very similar.
The Megane wins the day for me after reading your article and looking at the pictures of all the cars. The VW is just too bland. On looks it's the Megane first, then the RCZ, Scirocco.. oh and what was the other car... ah yes, just like everyone else here..I've forgotten the Audi TT which is..well..uniinspiring these days.
On paper, performance is Megane, Scirocco and then the RCZ. Oh blast, forgot the TT again..ah well it doesn't matter, wouldn't buy one anyway.
Re: Peugeot RCZ v its rivals
Well, I know it's daft to get into a discussion about the best-looking car here, or anywhere, but really I'm staggered about the comments about the Scirocco; I'm no fan of VWs, but the Scirocco is easily the best-resolved design compared to the Renault and Peugeot, both of which are crude and rather ludicrous in comparison. The subtle lines of the Scirocco grow on you and it'll look good in a few years time rather than overblown and silly.
Re: Peugeot RCZ v its rivals
Can't see why you would put the VW ahead of the Renault ! The Renault is faster , better handling and looks just as good and is cheaper ! The winner in my mind and up there with the VW R model !