Currently reading: Christmas road test – HondaJet
Honda's ultimate expression of calling itself a mobility company

The reason we and other car enthusiasts have a soft spot for Honda is not because it makes the Accord or ordinary versions of the Civic. At its most appealing, Honda is the kind of company that gave us the NSX and has the passion to go racing at the Isle of Man TT. 

It’s the Honda that, when other car makers were fitting catalytic converters but still couldn’t meet US Clean Air Act rules, made an engine so clean that it passed the tests without an exhaust catalyst. It’s the Honda that has even grown a shorter, hardier grain of rice, whose harvest is less affected by bad weather. 

Honda at its best is innovative and thoughtful. It tasks small teams of talented and often young engineers to think radically and wilfully differently, in order to create something that hasn’t been created before.

Because it’s the sixth-largest car maker in the world, things can’t always be like that – it also needs to make boring cars that sell - but the HondaJet, the light private jet you see here, is true to Honda’s roots. Its story epitomises the spirit of the company’s maverick founder, Soichiro Honda, to the core.

Honda puts a lot of stock in future R&D. It first looked into small aircraft and engines in 1986, and its first prototype light jet, the MH-02, was constructed in 1993. Honda’s first turbofan engine, the HFX-01, had 70 hours of testing in 1996.

It wasn’t until the turn of the century, however, that Honda began testing a new small turbofan engine and established a research facility in the United States, from where the first prototype HondaJet took its maiden flight in 2003. 

Even then, though, production was by no means a certainty. In fact, Honda and GE Aviation announced they were to commercialise just the engine in 2004, and it wasn’t until after the HondaJet’s first public outing, at Oshkosh air show in 2005, where its reception was overwhelming and customers tried to place orders on the spot, that Honda’s board gave the green light for sales. 

Five legislation-conforming aircraft have been completed since then, with the first production aircraft being certified now, ready for delivery in 2015.

Design and engineering (five stars)

Aircraft take a long time to develop, and Michimasa Fujino, the father of the HondaJet, was the kind of young, talented engineer who was a natural to excel at Honda when he was first tasked with researching small aircraft and jet engines. That was as long ago as 1986. 

Fujino’s research – and in the beginning, it was purely research – culminated in the development of the experimental MH-02 aircraft. Even in that aeroplane, which has high-mounted wings and engines mounted atop them, you can see Fujino’s radical thoughts on how to improve a very light jet.


Read our review

Car review

One of the first 'soft-roaders' returns for a new generation, but while upstarts like the Mazda CX-5 and BMW X3 have moved the segment on, does the Honda bring anything new?

Back to top

Most private jets didn’t look like the MH-02. And, indeed, most don’t look like the production HondaJet. Most, for example, have engines attached to the fuselage, for some sound engineering reasons. 

Forgive us while we outline those in detail, because they are key to the existence of the HondaJet. If Honda wasn’t going to do things differently, it wasn’t going to do them at all. 

Light jets are small and their wings are close to the ground, so there isn’t room to mount the engines beneath them. The landing gear would be tall and the cabin would be too far from the ground for a small, plane-mounted ladder to reach it. 

You can get around this by mounting the wings high, as on the MH-02 and some other small passenger planes, but the structural supports for the wings then stretch into the cabin space, just where you don’t want it to; they limit headroom in what is an already compact passenger compartment. Additionally, mounting the engines above the wings is fraught with associated problems, such as reduced lift and a problem called flutter.

These two problems kept Fujino turning at night, until he woke with an idea, grabbed the nearest pen and piece of paper – the back of a calendar, which he still has today – and began sketching. 

Despite the scepticism, he would find a way to make engines work on top of a jet’s wings. That way he could make a private plane that was more spacious inside yet faster and more fuel efficient than any of its competitors. He would finally have a reason to build the HondaJet. 

Then he’d just have to convince the management at Honda that he should do so. That Honda sees itself as a mobility company, and its board was persuaded by Fujino’s arguments, is how you’re able to read this story.

Interior (five stars)

Private jets are luxury goods, but that doesn’t always mean they’re luxurious. Because their cabins are compact, seating positions and, particularly, lavatories can be smaller than the posh seats found on commercial aircraft.

Back to top

The HondaJet aims to change all that, increasing cabin space by 20 per cent over other light aircraft and ensuring that passengers’ feet wouldn’t overlap each other when they have a ‘club’ seating arrangement (in which four passengers, two either side of the central aisle, face each other, behind two forward-facing seats).

The result is achieved by giving each passenger an extra 177mm of legroom over the class norm, and because more space behind the passenger compartment is allowed by the absence of two engines, there is a full-width lavatory compartment with two skylights. Behind that there’s an externally accessed baggage hold, whose design owes as much to golf bags as does the boot of most coupés – although here it can hold six bags rather than the car’s prerequisite two.

Honda, however, estimates that 50 per cent of HondaJet buyers will own a pilot’s licence and, not unlike Rolls-Royce cars, reckons that the easier and more pleasurable you make it to pilot the vehicle yourself, the more chance there is of owners occupying the front seats.

So Honda specified something practical yet truly revolutionary: a Garmin G3000 avionics suite that comprises three 14-inch landscape displays in front of the pilots, plus two (one each) glass touchscreen controllers between the front seats. As with car multimedia systems such as BMW’s iDrive, the idea is to bring as much information to the pilot as possible with the minimum of clutter. There are still analogue controls for the basics, however, plus the flight control systems – yokes, pedals and so on – and two engine start buttons that wouldn’t look out of place on the dash of a Civic Type R.

Performance (four and a half stars)

If you think designing an airframe is difficult, you should try designing an engine to go with it. Which is why, even though it is the most prolific engine manufacturer in the world, Honda enlisted a spot of help from GE Aviation, a subsidiary of General Electric, the world’s largest producer of jet engines. The people there can sell you anything from a small jet for a light aircraft through to a gas turbine for a battleship. 

Back to top

Even then, though, Honda couldn’t quite bring itself simply to specify an off-the-shelf unit, so it established the GE Honda engine company – a 50/50 joint venture between the two firms.

The engine they’ve co-developed, the HF120, is largely conventional in design. But it’s still unusual, mostly because it occupies a small niche, making 2050lbf of thrust. There aren’t many engines available with that kind of output because, until recently, the market for personal jets had been quite small. Now, however, it is growing at a terrific rate.

The plan for now is to build trust and confidence, not only with HondaJet customers but also with other aircraft makers. So the HF120 is a pretty understated, unremarkable unit, albeit one that’s very quiet, other than for one factor: it can go 5000 hours between overhauls, which is up to twice as long as many aero engines. 

When it comes to its performance and efficiency, though, the important number to know is the specific fuel consumption, which is a measure of how much fuel it uses per hour, per pound of thrust, at a given output. The lower the number, the better. 

These figures aren’t tested in a lab and published like a car’s fuel economy figure, because they change according to altitude and pressure and so on. So Honda says the HF120’s specific fuel consumption will be less than 0.7, where a leading rival’s might be less than 0.5. But even if you assume that all things are equal, which they might not be, at a given output, the design of the HondaJet will allow its engines to propel the plane faster than those of a rival. 

So you might use more fuel per hour, but given that the HondaJet’s cruising speed is 420 knots, when the class average is more like 350 knots, you’ll be in the sky for fewer hours. Winding back the engine power improves its efficiency, too, to the point where Honda reckons the HondaJet is 20 per cent more fuel efficient than its competitors. It’s a deliberate choice that is made possible by the design of the aircraft, rather than the design of the engine.

Ride and handling (five stars)

Back to top

Quite a lot of cars are air sprung, but not even a Mercedes S-class rides on a carpet of air in quite the same way as a HondaJet. So it’s as comfortable as conditions allow a very light jet to be. And the HondaJet is light. 

Its fuselage is made from composites rather than aluminium, which has obvious weight and some less obvious stiffness characteristics. And while the central fuselage is a constant radius (allowing the design to be stretched to create larger variants later), you’ll notice that there’s a slight bulge around the cockpit, to improve visibility on the ground.

The carbonfibre material has a honeycomb construction at the nose and tail, essential for precisely moulding a complex shape that retains laminar airflow. The same laminar flow is maintained over the wings, which are aluminium. 

Retaining laminar flow over the wing is traditionally particularly difficult, because wings are where you store the fuel. Wings of a large span compared to their length (from front to rear, viewed from overhead) are good for drag; they’re said to have a high aspect ratio. But because they’re narrow, they can’t store much fuel. The HondaJet has two large, vertical winglets, which act to maintain the aspect ratio of the wings of a much wider aircraft. At just 12.12m wide, however, it still fits inside a conventional hangar. 

The compact, low-drag shape makes the HondaJet cruise and accelerate easily while, according to its pilots, it handles with the agility you’d expect of a very light jet. The drag coefficient is as little as 0.032 at lower speeds, rising to just 0.052 at Mach 0.84. Any car whose drag figure starts with 0.2 can be proud, so the HondaJet is very slippery indeed. It also climbs at an impressive rate of 3990 feet per minute.

Buying and owning (four stars)

No light private jet is ever going to be a cheap purchase, but part of the plan was to allow a flight in a HondaJet – assuming all the passenger seats are full – to be competitive on cost with first-class tickets on a conventional scheduled airliner. We imagine you probably have to involve a bit of man-maths in order to calculate that, as well as factoring in the value of the time you’d save having your own aeroplane, but if you’re considering spending £2.9 million on your own jet, you probably don’t have to look too closely into the minutiae. 

Back to top

In the US, fuel is likely to cost around $2 (£1.30) per nautical mile, and the HondaJet’s range is 1180 nautical miles. What’s easily as important is that a service centre is within 90 minutes’ flight of most US cities, with a dedicated customer centre at the Honda Aircraft Company’s headquarters and factory in Greensboro, North Carolina. 

Verdict (five stars)

The HondaJet epitomises everything we love about Honda. The jet has been a laborious, slow-burn project whose leader has had to jump through multiple hoops and face multiple challenges in order to get the corporation to agree to put the aircraft into production, but in doing so it reveals that, deep down, Honda still has the old sparkle of Soichiro at its core.

Faster, lighter, more efficient and just more radical and interesting than the competition, the HondaJet is how, if we were bright enough to forge ourselves proper career as technology start-up billionaires or good old-fashioned rock stars, we’d do our long-distance travelling.

HA-420 HondaJet

We like About average cabin space, cutting-edge cockpit, faster and more efficient than rivals

We don't like Relativey high entry price, unremarkable engines

Price £2,870,000; Thrust 4100lb ft; Climb rate 3990ft/min; Range 1180 nautical miles; Take-off distance less than 4000ft; Landing distance less than 3000ft

Get the latest car news, reviews and galleries from Autocar direct to your inbox every week. Enter your email address below:

Join the debate

Add a comment…
5wheels 28 December 2014

Never owned or driven

Seems stupid when I think about it - but I have neither driven nor owned any Honda despite owning and at least driving more than 150 cars of one kind or another. I really dont know why this happened. Came close to a Civic 4 door sedan on one occasion but was put off by the sticker price and a friend who owned a big brother 4wd Honda told me that service costs are horrific, so being sensible I bought the Mazda 6 and never regretted it. But do admire the company their sporting traditions innovation and this aircraft really is quite special. Pity I will never own one but would love to fly in one :-))
Poisson 28 December 2014

Range anxiety

At 1180 nm, the range is insufficient to get from Perth to Adelaide without a refuelling stop. Perth to Sydney would require two. Maybe not such an issue in USA or Europe but I think the range would severely limit sales here in Oz.

It's a shame - it looks like a really nice little aeroplane.

coolboy 27 December 2014

mixed rewards

Very well, but better praise could be given to Honda if they opted for worldwide more competent range of vehicles, opposite of current status: big in US and to some extent in Japan & asian backyard, but negliglible anywere else. Here in Europe they have nothing in the Smart and Fiesta range (the Jazz is a perfect unknown in the Continent), not to mention the Accord and the missing opportunity that is the Civic. Shame
jason_recliner 28 December 2014

coolboy wrote:Very well, but

coolboy wrote:

Very well, but better praise could be given to Honda if they opted for worldwide more competent range of vehicles, opposite of current status: big in US and to some extent in Japan & asian backyard, but negliglible anywere else. Here in Europe they have nothing in the Smart and Fiesta range (the Jazz is a perfect unknown in the Continent), not to mention the Accord and the missing opportunity that is the Civic. Shame

Yep, and they aren't anything like as significant here in Australia compared to the 80s and 90s. They offer one class leader here, the Jazz, and a bunch of also-rans.

This little jet looks really cool and is quite an achievement, no doubt, but hopefully it was not at the expense of other commitments. Hopefully, it and the (hopefully!) forthcoming NSX signal a return of some sparkle to the cars.