Currently reading: Bentley Mulsanne v Rolls Ghost
Two new luxury cars battle it out in a tough to call twin test
Autocar
News
3 mins read
28 May 2010

Old rivalries enter a new era with the arrival of the Bentley Mulsanne alongside the Rolls-Royce Ghost. Steve Cropley makes a tough call.

Why not Mulsanne versus Phantom?

Rolls-Royce is perfectly happy for its number two model (at least in price, if not capability or quality) to be compared with Bentley’s new number one. Bentley, predictably, is keener for the Mulsanne to be seen as a Phantom rival, arguing that its car, already around £30,000 more expensive than a Ghost, can easily cost £260k-plus by the time you’ve added the bespoke features the company wants every owner to consider. But then Rolls owners buy bespoke options too…

See the exclusive pics from the Bentley Mulsanne vs Rolls-Royce Ghost twin test

Given this (gentlemanly) disagreement, our casting vote was to match Ghost and Mulsanne – because both are relatively practical cars, well able to be used every day, whereas the Phantom is so large, imposing and valuable that it’s almost ceremonial.

Similarities

The Mulsanne is 175mm (or just under seven inches) longer than the Ghost – not much of a difference in an overall length of 5.5 metres. Both cars weigh roughly 2.5 tonnes at the kerb and use a unique, mainly steel monocoque body with air suspension (to deliver the same ride standards whatever the car’s load condition). Each has a twin-turbocharged engine of just under seven litres, with copious power and torque fed through one of ZF’s new eight-speed gearboxes.

Interiors

The Rolls majors on simplicity. As in the Phantom, controls are arranged in a strict hierarchy – and non-essentials are hidden – so owners will never be able to complain of complexity.

The Bentley impresses in an entirely different way, by being comprehensive and more appealing to the sporting driver. It has a superb array of dials and switches – including a tachometer and about the best-looking central transmission quadrant put into a car.

Engines

On our solus test of the Bentley, we wondered if its V8 hadn’t lost character in the latest round of re-engineering, by becoming a shade too reluctant to produce the V8 thunder of old (although it will do it). But against the always-silent Rolls it is quite a character, whose party trick is amazing thrust barely above idle (peak torque is 752lb ft at 1750rpm).

The Rolls’s twin-turbo V12 is nominally more powerful if you rev it out (peak power is 563bhp at 5250rpm) but its peak torque is nearly 200lb ft less. On combined fuel consumption, there’s quite a gap: the Rolls beats the Bentley’s fairly poor 16.8mpg (combined) by almost 25 per cent.

Dynamic ability

The Bentley is – narrowly – the better driver’s car. It is as fast and absorbing as a sports car, and a damned sight more comfortable. With every mile you can feel how well its four-position Drive Dynamics Control has been honed, because you find yourself tuning the car for driving conditions and your own state of mind. The Rolls has just one well-chosen setting.

Verdict

I’d choose the Rolls-Royce. As I said when we first drove the car, the choices made by this car’s creators about price, size, powertrain, suspension settings and styling are all of the highest quality. Above all, I’d prefer the Rolls for its styling, surely the best balanced of any four-door luxury saloon since the discreetly brilliant Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow of the mid-1960s.

Trouble is, having sampled the first-class driving experience this latest Mulsanne affords, I suspect I’d wind up dissatisfied if I chose anything else. In this case, there could be only one alternative, the so-called squillionaire’s option. Buy them both.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Find an Autocar review

Back to top

You can read the full story, plus see more exclusive pictures from the test, in this week's Autocar magazine, which is on sale now.

See all the latest Bentley Mulsanne reviews, news and videoSee all the latest Rolls-Royce Ghost reviews, news and video

Join the debate

Comments
32
Add a comment…
Lord Flashheart 29 May 2010

Re: Bentley Mulsanne v Rolls Ghost

Dan McNeil v2 wrote:
Brava wrote:

mfe wrote:
The Ghost looks too German !

What's it exactly that makes it look German? Reference to specific design elements would be appreciated.

The guy is clutching at straws. I certainly don't see an 88 mm gun on the roof.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yfl6Lu3xQW0[/youtube]

Sean Parts 29 May 2010

Re: Bentley Mulsanne v Rolls Ghost

Brava wrote:

mfe wrote:
The Ghost looks too German !

What's it exactly that makes it look German? Reference to specific design elements would be appreciated.

I would say that it looks a bit Audi A8 around the C pillar. It's still the one I'd have. Divine.

Straight Six Man 26 May 2010

Re: Bentley Mulsanne v Rolls Ghost

hugoboss wrote:
Exactly. German? The Rolls has a simplicity of line and a balance that screams England or Italy. If anything, it's a direct, multi-generationally improved Rover P5B Coupe. The Bentley, and as a lifelong marque fan this is hard to say, looks like it was designed by a Chinese company for the Middle East market. It's hideous enough they could do a deal with GM and badge it a Cadillac in the US market.

The Bentley looks nothing like modern Cadillacs - though, frankly, I'd much rather have a CTS-V than the Mulsanne. However, with the big, round headlamps and the shape of the D-post, I'd have said it was the Mulsanne that was closer to what I'm told was the longest-lasting car ever on the ministerial fleets... not that I can remember as far back as the Wilson days, you understand! *shudders at thinking I'm that age already*...

Find an Autocar car review