Currently reading: Road plan: more tech, less new tarmac
New Highways Agency plan to maximise road capacity

The Highways Agency has published its plan for the next year, with an increasing emphasis on using technology to maximise capacity of the current road network – and with very few plans for road expansion schemes. New tech includes ‘Active Traffic Management’ – which has already been trialled on the M25 and M42 – plus queue detection systems and a planned increase in the number of message display boards that have already started to proliferate across the motorway network. Indeed, the 44-page report waits until page 31 to actually mention any major road improvement schemes.The good news is that the next three years should see 15 schemes, including widening the M1 between Junction 6a and Junction 10, and starting work building the four-mile Hindhead link, which will finally complete the dual carriageway between London and Portsmouth.The report also confirms the extension of the trial conducted on parts of the M42 and M6 to allow drivers to use the hard shoulder at peak times. The most sensible initiative is probably the proposal to restrict lorries from overtaking on certain heavily congested stretches of dual carriageway, something that has worked successfully in other European countries for years.

Nick Cackett

Advertisement

Latest business news

Fiat Scudo Ellesmere Port
Stellantis builds vans in Luton and Cheshire, which Tavares says should count towards its ZEV quota
Stellantis CEO: Terrible ZEV mandate will kill UK car industry
Mini Oxford production line
Oxford will produce only combustion-engined versions of the new Mini Cooper until 2026
UK car production falls amid several model changeovers
1.Ford Otosan Yeniköy drone
Last year Ford Otosan made a profit of the equivalent of £1.1 billion
Inside Ford’s Turkish goldmine: home of the Transit

Join the debate

Comments
5
Add a comment…
coolGav 2 April 2008

Re: Road plan: more tech, less new tarmac

superstevie wrote:
But you have to draw a line somewhere to the amount of expansion. Do we really need 16 line wide motorways up and down the country?? cause it'll head that way if they kept expanding!

I think what's needed are roads that take people from A to B without forcing them to go via C and D. It doesn't have to be motorways (they should only be built in areas where there is a need for that kind of road and there isn't one already). Dual carriageways and decent smaller roads that actually go where people travel would ease congestion. I know that bypasses cost a lot of money, but they do mean people who are forced to commute through towns (since there is no reasonable alternative) stop gridlocking them. Build sensible, safe roads that allow people to minimise the travelling time - then you will reduce the traffic.

PRODIGY 30 March 2008

Re: Road plan: more tech, less new tarmac

JJBoxster wrote:

Superstevie - The Government has no intention of solving congestion. The aim is to clogg, congest and annoy people out of their cars onto cruddy public transport. They don't say it 'officially' they have the policy (because they couldn't actually get an official policy through parliament and the House of Lords or past voters) but their deeply disengenuous under the cloak 'unofficial policy' is there in their statements.

This is democracy by stealth and deceipt. Gordon Brown was taken to court over there being no democratic vote (promised in Labours manifesto) for further undemocratically unelected EEC integration. His lawyer stated "manifesto pledges are not a reasonable democratic expectation".

Then you have the Housing Ministers plans for building new Towns with the expressed intent to drive people out of their cars onto buses and bicycles with 15mph speed limits. Then you have Transport Minister Dr. Stephen in a Feb '07 webchat saying "I promise this is a real debate. If we don't convince the public then road pricing simply won't happen". He has 1.5 million sugnatures in a petition against road pricing but he's rolling out road pricing already.

Dr 'Einstein' Stephen said "We are planning to spend £140bn of central govt money in the 10 years up to 2014/15 on transport...But despite all this we still predict congestion will be 25% worse by 2015." Brilliant! £140bn and his stated aim is to fail miserably. I'd sack this total loser and the entire upper civil service of the Dept of Transport if he came to me with a 'plan' to fail after spending so much money. Anyone anywhere else would sack this idiot too.

Then you have the Government effectively black-mailing Councils according to some critics with (public) money for public transport if they introduce Red Ken like Con-Zones in their city centres. Hell £250M ripped out of motorists pockets and Ken has completly failed to achieve either lower congestion or lower pollution. And the Govt has waisted £millions more of public (our) money with the heavy capital investment required to start up the Con-Zone scam!

So what does the Government do with this massively costly failure in London? It plans to throw more public (our) money at Councils to roll out the Con-Zone (Economic Failure Zones) nationwide. Abject failure of test to achieve anything whatsoever in London - let's roll out and repeat this financial and failure nationwide - genius these politcians!

Anyone any idea why Labours books look bankrupt and Britains living standards (because of higher and higher taxes to pay for more and more public spending on less and less economically viable/pig-ignorant dead-ends) have gone down the pan?

I've only just joined up here, but I like you already mate!

Is it true that Red Ken doctored traffic lights in London to create congestion, just so he could bring in the congestion charge?

Where i live in Worcester, the (Labour) council are on about congestion charging on one of our main roads IF we reject their plan of putting a bus lane on this (narrow as it is) road.

I too hate the fact that Gordon Brown wasn't elected by us, but yet he and his cronies are making life worse in the UK. More people now than ever are moving abroad to escape this lunacy, just as well - it makes more space for the illegals.

superstevie 30 March 2008

Re: Road plan: more tech, less new tarmac

i think they have the right idea, in that they need to maximise the technology out there to give real time information and proper traffic management. However, this should also be done along with road improvements and expansions of certain stretches of the road network.

But you have to draw a line somewhere to the amount of expansion. Do we really need 16 line wide motorways up and down the country?? cause it'll head that way if they kept expanding!