New Euro NCAP tests introduced to rate pedestrian avoidance braking systems
10 November 2015

Euro NCAP will begin testing pedestrian avoidance systems from 2016.

The new tests are being introduced in response to the increasing popularity of the systems, which attempt to stop a car when a collision with a pedestrian is likely.

The tests will rate the car's detection of a hazard and the car's response when a pedestrian-shaped dummy crosses its path. Three scenarios are tested: an adult walking into the path of the car, running into the path of the car, and a child walking out from behind a parked car.

Higher-scoring cars will stop from 25mph without hitting the dummies or at least reduce the speed of impact. Testing will also be carried out at speeds above 25mph up to 37mph, where the systems should reduce the speed of impact to non-fatal speeds, if not stopping the car altogether. According to NCAP, early detection, quick response and quick but firm application of the brakes are all areas in which the software could improve upon human drivers.

Michiel van Ratingen, Euro NCAP Secretary General justified the new rounds of testing, saying: “Vehicles designed to perform well in these tests will be better equipped to prevent thousands of needless deaths and life-changing injuries on our European roads. Therefore, from 2016 the rating will give credit to those vehicle models that offer this capability. At the same time, these tests will make it possible for new car buyers and fleet operators to make an informed choice.”

By Jimi Beckwith

Join the debate


11 November 2015
How well do these systems work when, for example, someone steps off a busy pavement but has no intention of actually crossing the path of the vehicle?
Autocar wrote:

According to NCAP, early detection, quick response and quick but firm application of the brakes are all areas in which the software could improve upon human drivers.

Will the car have been "sold a dummy" and (over)react by emergency braking?

11 November 2015
I think this is a good test to include. I do, however, find NCAP ratings confusing. For example, the current Smart Fortwo gets a 4 star rating, the same as the previous version. Except ot isn't, as they changed the test, so the newer one has performed much better. Either they need to reflect that by downgrading the previous result, or, do something as simple as changing the colour of the stars to indicate to buyers that there have been different tests and aren't comparable.

Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

  • Ford Mustang
    First Drive
    24 March 2018
    Sixth-generation Mustang gets a leaner face, revised suspension, improved safety equipment and a more power V8. We see how it fares on southern French roads
  • First Drive
    23 March 2018
    Fully-loaded, big-hitting diesel CLS shows the potential perils of ticking too many options boxes on your order form. A good car with a bad suspension combination.
  • BMW M5
    First Drive
    22 March 2018
    Super saloon deploys four-wheel drive to improve every facet of its driving experience. Faster and more capable than any, and more exciting than most, of its celebrated predecessors
  • Range Rover Sport SVR
    First Drive
    22 March 2018
    More power and an intoxicating soundtrack have breathed new life into our love affair with the biggest, baddest Range Rover Sport variant
  • First Drive
    21 March 2018
    The new Vantage has been developed as a Porsche 911 beater, and our first taste on UK roads suggests it can live up to that bold claim