New Euro NCAP tests introduced to rate pedestrian avoidance braking systems
10 November 2015

Euro NCAP will begin testing pedestrian avoidance systems from 2016.

The new tests are being introduced in response to the increasing popularity of the systems, which attempt to stop a car when a collision with a pedestrian is likely.

The tests will rate the car's detection of a hazard and the car's response when a pedestrian-shaped dummy crosses its path. Three scenarios are tested: an adult walking into the path of the car, running into the path of the car, and a child walking out from behind a parked car.

Higher-scoring cars will stop from 25mph without hitting the dummies or at least reduce the speed of impact. Testing will also be carried out at speeds above 25mph up to 37mph, where the systems should reduce the speed of impact to non-fatal speeds, if not stopping the car altogether. According to NCAP, early detection, quick response and quick but firm application of the brakes are all areas in which the software could improve upon human drivers.

Michiel van Ratingen, Euro NCAP Secretary General justified the new rounds of testing, saying: “Vehicles designed to perform well in these tests will be better equipped to prevent thousands of needless deaths and life-changing injuries on our European roads. Therefore, from 2016 the rating will give credit to those vehicle models that offer this capability. At the same time, these tests will make it possible for new car buyers and fleet operators to make an informed choice.”

By Jimi Beckwith

Join the debate

Comments
2

11 November 2015
How well do these systems work when, for example, someone steps off a busy pavement but has no intention of actually crossing the path of the vehicle?
Autocar wrote:

According to NCAP, early detection, quick response and quick but firm application of the brakes are all areas in which the software could improve upon human drivers.

Will the car have been "sold a dummy" and (over)react by emergency braking?

11 November 2015
I think this is a good test to include. I do, however, find NCAP ratings confusing. For example, the current Smart Fortwo gets a 4 star rating, the same as the previous version. Except ot isn't, as they changed the test, so the newer one has performed much better. Either they need to reflect that by downgrading the previous result, or, do something as simple as changing the colour of the stars to indicate to buyers that there have been different tests and aren't comparable.

Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

  • Lexus LC500
    Car review
    20 October 2017
    Futuristic Lexus LC coupé mixes the latest technology with an old-school atmospheric V8
  • Maserati Levante S GranSport
    First Drive
    20 October 2017
    Get ready to trade in your diesels: Maserati’s luxury SUV finally gets the engine it’s always needed
  • Jaguar XF Sportbrake TDV6
    First Drive
    19 October 2017
    The handsome Jaguar XF Sportbrake exhibits all the hallmarks that makes the saloon great, and with the silky smooth diesel V6 makes it a compelling choice
  • Volkswagen T-Roc TDI
    First Drive
    19 October 2017
    Volkswagen's new compact crossover has the looks, the engineering and the build quality to be a resounding success, but not with this diesel engine
  • BMW M550i
    First Drive
    19 October 2017
    The all-paw M550i is a fast, effortless mile-muncher, but there's a reason why it won't be sold in the UK