Currently reading: Aston boss: cost of autonomy will force mass car firm mergers
Andy Palmer predicts major industry consolidation due to heavy spending required to develop new technology
Jim Holder
News
4 mins read
4 April 2019

The investment needed to develop connected and autonomous vehicles will likely lead to mass consolidation of car companies globally, according to Aston Martin boss Andy Palmer. However, he also believes that the six globally recognised luxury car makers today - including Aston and with Lagonda set to join in 2022 when it launches an electric SUV - will thrive despite the challenges.

Speaking at the Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders’ Connected conference, Palmer said he believes many existing brands will have to form alliances, merge with or sell to rivals in order to survive.

“We’re all developing similar technology costing billions and that’s nonsense,” said Palmer. “I think it is inevitable car companies will come together through mergers and acquisitions. The requirements will be too much for many of the firms involved. The business model of spending $1bn to develop a car and then have to pile it high and sell it cheap - discounting - in order to keep factories turning and maintain economies of scale is broken.”

Today, most analysts put 14 conglomerates - of around 200 car companies globally, selling approaching 100m cars between them this year - at the heart of the global industry: Ford, PSA Group, Tata, Daimler, VW Group, Honda, Toyota, GM, BMW, Nissan, FCA Group, Geely, Renault and Hyundai. However, the rise of Chinese brands that are beginning to take significant sales in their home market - the largest for car sales in the world - is set to disrupt that dynamic.

“Yes, enlightened mega-companies like Toyota can develop technology alone and survive, but I feel many more companies will fall under the wing of such firms to the point that we have just two or three mega-companies dominating, in the way Boeing and Airbus do in the airline industry,” said Palmer.

“Along the way I’m sure we’ll see newcomers, some who will succeed, some who will be bought and some who will fail. But the inevitability is that there will be mergers and acquisitions.”

Mercedes-Benz and BMW are already collaborating on autonomous technology, while firms such as the VW Group and Toyota are seeking partners to share their electrified technology with. Palmer concedes that Aston Martin and Lagonda would have to forge partnerships to supplement its own advances in the new technologies, but added that the firm's small size, relative agility and ultra-luxury status offered a bright future.

"The six luxury car makers - us, Ferrari, Bentley et al - represent just 3% of global car brands and 0.06% of all global sales, but being globally recognised as a luxury brand is an accolade that is hard to obtain and even harder to retain," said Palmer. "If something becomes easy to access or create it becomes a commodity, and for mainstream car makers that is a very real risk, but for car companies that don't have to sell one more car to help a parent firm's bottom line, there are opportunities. Independent, luxury car makers like us can thrive by fighting against commoditisation and focusing on adding to our mythology.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Find an Autocar review

Back to top

"My prediction is that in 10 years' time there will be no new players in the luxury sector. With Lagonda, there will be just seven of us. But, conversely, I wonder if one of the luxury makers might be forced down into the premium sector just to add that one more sale to the bottom line."

Palmer also hit out at car companies and legislators that he feels are seeking to gain a publicity advantage by fast-tracking the development of autonomous technology onto cars driven by the public too soon. He did not specify which brands he was referring to, although he did highlight the recent announcement from EU legislators to fit certain safety equipment, including speed limiters, as standard from 2022, as well as highlighting the shortcomings of the current 3G, 4G and 5G networks.

“Car companies have a moral obligation to do their best to strive for zero fatalities,” he said. “My argument is that must be done in a logical way which takes note of the fact that by far the biggest reason for accidents is driver distraction and error. We have to be careful that we don’t rush technology that adds to those issues.

“If we legislate around populist policies without thinking, then customers could end up being used in beta testing on public roads. In my mind, any company launching level-three autonomous vehicles [where a human has to be ready to take back control of the vehicle] is reckless. That is why we – and others – will move straight from level two to four. Those that don’t, risk being reckless.

"The recent European regulations around speed control risk more accidents by causing more distraction around speed controls. I understand geo-fencing areas around schools and hospitals, for instance, and enforcing lower speed limits there, but when the technology isn't there to support the ambition then blindly applying something because it gets soundbites and votes is wrong.”

Read more

Whatever next? The future of motoring

Research shows public perception of autonomous cars has a long way to go

BMW and Daimler to partner on autonomous car technology

Join the debate

Comments
6

4 April 2019

Aston looking for a buyer?

4 April 2019

To compare the aircraft industry to the car industry is dumb, one makes commercial products valued at the 10's of millions the other makes a variety of products, aimed at differing markets that cost from £10k upwards.

After thousands of Autocar advertorials over the last 3 years we're no nearer to having or even wanting a practical cost effective Autonomous system other than advanced cruise control and self parking (that most people don't opt for or use once trusted on them).

4 April 2019

Perhaps if the management hadn't trousered quite so much of the proceeds of the flotation, AM plc would have a bit more available for product development.

4 April 2019

I'm no expert but when I heard about the automatic speed limit business that's coming in I did wonder what effect it will have on the upper end of the car market. The case for spending hundreds of thousands on a 400 or 500 bhp car that won't be able to exceed the speed limit is going to be hard. I wonder if the likes of AM will go more luxury that performance to try and temp us with their products.

5 April 2019

The reason why Volvo could easily switch to four cylinder power plants is that very few places on the planet allow you to tap the capability of more cylinders.  Walk around central London in the summer and you will find wall to wall exotic sport cars traveling at low speed or mostly parked. The truly wealthy individuals either have their city cars or fly them in to escape from the heat in the Middle East. If they want to experience a bit of speed they head to a track or a bit of private road.  If you have to ask, can you really afford it?

4 April 2019

www.economist.com/node/13610819/print?story_id=13610819

That's what Sergio Marchionne said in 2009...

Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review