Currently reading: Jaguar Land Rover continues legal battle against LandWind X7 copycat
China has cancelled patents on the Range Rover Evoque and the LandWind X7 copycat, but JLR will still take legal action
Mark Tisshaw
3 mins read
4 June 2016

The Range Rover Evoque and its controversial copycat, the LandWind X7, have both had their patents cancelled in China, but Jaguar Land Rover's legal proceedings are set to continue.

Both car's patents were ruled invalid because the designs had been displayed before a patent application was issued, but Jaguar Land Rover remains committed to pursuing legal action against the LandWind copycat in a separate unfair competition and copyright case, according to news agency Reuters.

History of the Chinese copycat car - picture gallery

The LandWind X7 was unveiled at the 2015 Guangzhou motor show, prompting controversy as just one hall away JLR launched a locally made Evoque, the first product of its joint venture with Chinese manufacturer Chery.

At the time of the launch Chris Bryant, president of the JLR joint-venture, wouldn't comment on the X7 copycat, stating that he was, “here to speak about our joint-venture Evoque”. However, Jaguar Land Rover filed an action against copyright and unfair competition in a court in Beijing's eastern district, Chaoyang.

Senior JLR company figures have poured scorn on the LandWind since it was revealed, and you can read their comments here.

At the launch of the the authentic Evoque made in China, Bryant pointed out that the only difference between it and one built in the UK was the badge on the back, which has the joint-venture name written in Chinese. “It’s the same quality, same service, same choice,” he said.

With prices starting at around the Chinese equivalent of £14,000 the LandWind X7 doppelganger appears a steal against £40,000-plus for the locally produced Evoque.

Range Rover Evoque vs LandWind X7 - which is better?

Autocar's reporter at the Guangzhou motor show confirmed that the X7 has reasonable quality leathers and soft plastics for a Chinese car. He noted, however, that many of the panel gaps were irregular, and highligted bubbling of paintwork on corners. Furthermore, the gaps of the rear doors and boot were neither regular nor flush with the sides. He also noted that LandWind previously scored a zero-star Euro NCAP crash test safety ratings for its Isuzu Rodeo-based X6.

There are differences between the cars: the X7 is larger by more than 5cm including a 1cm longer wheelbase and most notably has a roof rack. It has an underpowered 2.0-litre turbo petrol engine delivering 188bhp coupled to either a six-speed manual or eight-speed automatic.

That's against 237bhp in the joint-venture Evoque with a nine-speed automatic unit.

External differences are minor and are largely a matter of detailing. This is carried over into the interior which sports a very similar dashboard layout. One of the few areas where the LandWind wins out is that it has a larger infotainment touchscreen than the Evoque.

Read more:

Read our review on the five-door and coupé versions of the Range Rover Evoque

Zotye SR9 is a Porsche Macan clone

Why we need to ignore China's copycat car designs


Find an Autocar review

Read our review

Car review
Range Rover Evoque

The Range Rover Evoque draws heavily on style as a selling point, but also possesses the substance to back it up

Back to top

Additional reporting by Mark Andrews

Get the latest car news, reviews and galleries from Autocar direct to your inbox every week. Enter your email address below:

Join the debate


20 November 2014
Would be interesting to see how the LandFart does in a crash. I think they should be made to crash test every last one.

21 April 2015
Might not be bad. Their x5 suv got 4 out of 5 stars in C NCAP. C NCAP isnt upto Euroncap standards but a 4 out of 5 isnt disasterous.

4 June 2016
Much cheaper and probably more reliable (let's face it, what isn't?)

JLR must be worried about how good the LandWind is, otherwise why would they bother?

6 June 2016
They win. They have the west over a cheaply-made Chinese barrel.

20 November 2014
Put it this way, I'd rather have a plastic turd than an actual lump of sh*t. Mind you, I wouldn't touch either with a bargepole.

20 November 2014
is it bad that i actually think the Chinese version looks better? from the back at least

20 November 2014
The lack of respect for Intellectual Property (including design) seems to be endemic throughout China’s industry, to the point one wonders if such plagiarism is actually supported by the Government!

It is suggested that it would (now) be to the benefit of JLR’s Chinese partner “Chery” (and of course JLR themselves), for “Chery” to take some initiative in addressing this problem.

20 November 2014
I'll take the LandWind. And have £26K left over for a couple of classics in the garage.

20 November 2014
michael knight wrote:

I'll take the LandWind. And have £26K left over for a couple of classics in the garage.

Me too. Its a bit unfair to call it 'underpowered' with 188 bhp. Most the ones sold here are with either 150 or 190 bhp diesels and no one slates them.


21 November 2014
It is possible to create an almost exact copy of a china teapot in chocolate, however, as soon as you pour hot water into it, it's still a chocolate teapot................


Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review