Currently reading: UK government scraps all smart motorway plans
Government recognises "lack of public confidence" in all-lane-running motorways

The government has announced that no new smart motorways will be built in the UK, citing a "lack of public confidence" in the all-lane-running roads.

In a shock announcement on Saturday night, the government said it will cancel all plans for new smart motorways, including 11 that were already under construction and three earmarked for construction between 2025-2030. 

It cited "financial pressures" and "the current lack of public confidence" in the roads as reasons for the decision, adding that the move would save more than £1 billion.

It suggested that smart motorways could be back on the table in the future, however: "Cancelling these schemes will allow more time to track public confidence in smart motorways over a longer period."

READ: How smart are smart motorways really?

Early last year, it was announced that no new smart motorways would be built before the government had recorded five years of safety data on those opened before 2030, in response to widespread criticism of the safety of such roads. Critics point to the danger posed by the hard shoulder serving predominantly as a live lane for traffic, and the fact that refuge areas on smart motorways are spaced far apart.

Prime minister Rishi Sunak had pledged to axe the smart motorway roll-out scheme as part of his campaign for leadership of the Conservative party last year. He said that the move has been made because "all drivers deserve to have confidence in the roads they use to get around the country".

Commenting on the announcement, which has been made ahead of the upcoming local elections on 4 May, Sunak added: “Many people across the country rely on driving to get to work, to take their children to school and go about their daily lives and I want them to be able to do so with full confidence that the roads they drive on are safe."

No work will be undertaken to reinstall permanent hard shoulders on existing smart motorways. Instead, the government says it will press on with a previously announced, £900 million scheme to improve the safety of these roads with the addition of 150 new emergency areas, and an upgrade programme for the system which detects stopped vehicles in live lanes and closes them to traffic. 

Tools will not immediately be downed, however: work will continue to convert the M56 J6-8 and M6 J21a-26 to all-lane running, "given they are already over three quarters constructed".

Which smart motorway schemes have been cancelled?

M3 J9–14 

M40/M42 interchange 

M62 J20–25 

M25 J10–16 

Back to top

M1 Junction 10 - 13  

M4 - M5 interchange (M4 Junction 19 - 20 and M5 Junction 15 – 17) 

M6 Junction 4 - 5  

M6 Junction 5 - 8  

M6 Junction 8 - 10a  

M42 Junction 3a - 7  

M62 Junction 25 – 30 

M1 North Leicestershire

M1 junctions 35A – 39 Sheffield to Wakefield

M6 junctions 19 – 21A Knutsford to Croft 

Felix Page

Felix Page
Title: News and features editor

Felix is Autocar's news editor, responsible for leading the brand's agenda-shaping coverage across all facets of the global automotive industry - both in print and online.

He has interviewed the most powerful and widely respected people in motoring, covered the reveals and launches of today's most important cars, and broken some of the biggest automotive stories of the last few years. 

Join the debate

Comments
7
Add a comment…
Andrew1 17 April 2023
Now let's try Smart Border Checks, brexiteers told us they would work :))
The Apprentice 16 April 2023
New smart motorways already have this but now older ones, they recently spent a fortune upgrading the detection technology, look for the little Grey cones every few hundred yards, these are radar scanners to detect cars coming to a stop in the inside lane and trigger lane the closure alarm.

Before this they depended on bored operators watching endless camera feeds.
My point is, if they had not been cheapskates in the first place and installed these systems from the first one, maybe the death toll would have been a lot lower.

I still am not keen on them and I am glad they will not do any more although the ban is too late for the bottom of the M42 which is already underway.

I don't perceive any improved traffic flow from them anyway, people in the UK are too poor at lane discipline for even 20 lanes to make any difference!

The Apprentice 16 April 2023
Ah just noticed the M42/M40 is being cancelled.. good! hope they remove the works soon, it caused chaos around here. Within weeks of the work starting, they had to close the entire motorway as they were running traffic on a hard shoulder not up to it and it soon crumbled into diabolical potholes, people were having to swerve around causing accidents. They had to resurface all the hard shoulder.
289 16 April 2023

OK, so no new Smart Motorway schemes to be built, but I take it from this that the Government will continue to gamble with drivers lives with those already built....even though they know they are lethal.

Billions spent to risk the populaces lives on a blatantly flawed idea....years of driving disruption, missed flights, missed meetings and massive traffic jams causing untold environmental damage and chaos for drivers.....for what?!!!

Who signs off this shit and then walks away from the carnage with a gold plated pension.

You couldnt make it up....clowns running the country.

Citytiger 16 April 2023
289 wrote:

Who signs off this shit and then walks away from the carnage with a gold plated pension.

You couldnt make it up....clowns running the country.

Unelected Civil Servants, you dont really believe its a minister who may have only been in the job 5 minutes who comes up with these schemes do you... 

Andrew1 17 April 2023
Ultimately it was a political decision, no matter how much tory activists will try to shift the blame to "unelected civil servants", who are the new "immigrants". Right wing populists always need some category of people to blame.
streaky 17 April 2023

I always thought that the original idea of using the hard shoulder as an extra lane in instances of high traffic density, and importantly, low speeds (ie crawling) was a good one.  Then some idiot decided to do away with hard shoulders altogether and there should be a witch hunt to unearth that culprit.  I would have thought the existing "smart" motorways could have the inner lane converted back to a hard shoulder and used in this more sensible manner, and the other technologies mentioned retained to enhance safety.