From £14,245
Energetic petrol motor makes the entry-level Yeti the pick of the range

Our Verdict

Skoda Yeti
The Yeti is a crossover that's available with both two- and four-wheel drive

The Skoda Yeti crossover is a member of the fastest-growing niche of vehicles

  • First Drive

    Skoda VisionS concept review

    Skoda's VisionS concept gives us an early indication as to what its upcoming Kodiaq SUV will be like. We take it for a short drive
  • First Drive

    Skoda Yeti 1.2 TSI SE first drive review

    Urban-derived Yeti is competent and practical, with all the driver engagement which made its forebear such a success

What is it?

This is the Skoda Yeti 1.2 TSI DSG, which uses the entry-level 103bhp turbocharged petrol engine mated to the VW Group seven-speed double-clutch DSG 'box.

Only the 1.8 TSI and higher-powered 2.0 TDI engines get four-wheel drive, so the 1.2 TSI settles for standard front-wheel drive. Despite this it’s likely to be one of the best selling models in the line-up alongside the two-wheel drive 110 TDI.

What’s it like?

Forget any preconceptions you might have about the Skoda brand and the questionable Yeti name. This is one of the best real-world vehicles around, and fitted with the entry-level 1.2 TSI it also benefits from an energetic and refined motor.

As ever the DSG gearbox is an admirably smooth and unobtrusive transmission that manages to be in the right gear the majority of the time. Those people who must have an auto won’t ever be disappointed. Even so, it can feel as though there are too many ratios for the engine’s limited power resource and you’ll find the ‘box switching cogs when there seems no need, but on the motorway it works well toward making the engine quiet and economical.

The hassle-free progress is more down to the excellent ride and handling combination and energetic motor than the ever-competent VW Group DSG.

Don’t be deceived by the engine’s underwhelming on-paper figures. In practice the free-revving TSI motor is a rewarding engine to work around urban roads and even on motorways.

Okay, so you’ll find yourself without much instant acceleration for overtaking at high speed but the rest of the time the 1.2 does nothing but compliment the Yeti’s well-judged package of spacious, high-quality interior and composed road holding.

Should I buy one?

Absolutely, and don’t be put off be the car’s niche placement. It may be a crossover but the compact and comfortable Yeti does the job of a standard hatch better than many big sellers in its price range.

Opt for the Auto option if you must, but given the decent equipment list, the 1.2 TSI manual Yeti may well be the best in the range as well as the cheapest.

Join the debate

Comments
4

25 June 2009

OK I want one! 4 wheel drive, 2.0tdi 140bhp. Its 159g/km CO2 slips in under the all important 160g level that is now all important to companies (earlier this year the rules changed so companies can write off the cost of company cars below 160g/km against corporate tax TWICE as quickly at 20%) Also many companies give a big discount to chooser users in their monthly payments if they pick a vehicle below 160g/km. 1st port of call would be the local remapper, extra 30bhp for £200.

So how does it look in Black? Its difficult to get the scale of it, looks fairly compact, easy to find a parking slot, can in future you take some pictures with people sitting in it? and perhaps some parked next to another car like a Focus so we can see some scale?
Carrying ability is often important in this type of vehicle, perhaps a shot of a case in the boot?

27 June 2009

[quote The Apprentice]OK I want one[/quote]

Okay I don't. I really am not interested it looks awful the name is horrendous and thats that. And anyway with it being a 4X4 type of car it's fuel economy isn't going to be too impressive.

27 June 2009

[quote aceman]Okay I don't. I really am not interested it looks awful the name is horrendous and thats that. And anyway with it being a 4X4 type of car it's fuel economy isn't going to be too impressive.[/quote] The transmission is a Haldex part time 4wd system. I believe it's "on-demand", so the 4wd versions are effectively 2wd unless wheel-spin is detected. Which means fuel consumption should be close to the Golf and Octavia on which its based.

27 June 2009

Official figures for both 140bhp and 170bhp 2.0tdi version with 4 wheel drive is 46.3mpg combined at 159 g/km CO2. How can that be described as bad?

Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

  • Mercedes C350e Sport
    First Drive
    28 September 2016
    Petrol-electric C-Class is a surprisingly well-priced alternative to a diesel but not the greatest example of the new ‘PHEV’ breed
  • Car review
    23 September 2016
    Aston kicks off its ‘second century plan’ with an all-new turbo V12 grand tourer
  • Ford Ka+ 1.2 Ti-VCT 85
    First Drive
    22 September 2016
    A rounded, refined and well-sorted bargain supermini – once you’re used to the confusing role redefinition imposed on the once-cheeky Ka
  •  Maserati Ghibli Diesel
    First Drive
    22 September 2016
    Maserati releases another range of updates for its range best seller, the Ghibli. We've driven the diesel version, but there's little improvement on before
  • Tipo Front
    First Drive
    21 September 2016
    New Fiat Tipo offers impressive space and practicality for a reasonable price. We try the 1.6 diesel on the demanding roads of North Wales