From £17,665
All the fun of the MX-5 with added security and useability. If you think the premium’s worth it, go for it.

Our Verdict

Mazda MX-5 2005-2015
Mazda's MX-5 has been established for decades as an affordable and enjoyable rear-drive convertible

The Mazda MX-5 is still great fun, and more grown up

14 September 2006

What’s new? If there’s one good thing to have come out of the invention of the Peugeot 206CC, you’re looking at it. Because despite the popularity of those removable lids that people have been fitting to MX-5s for the past decade, Mazda has only just twigged that its punters might want a hard-topped roadster. And it’s the success of those flexible coupé cabrio sheds that has done it.And so – with all the plagiarism and efficiency you’d expect from a Japanese carmaker – Mazda’s nicked the idea and introduced an affordable hard-topped convertible that just happens to be better than anyone else’s. There’s no chassis flex, no dumpy rear end styling. This is just an MX-5 with a folding hard roof, pure and simple.What’s it like? Nope, I didn’t believe it at first either. But the cleverness of the hood means that it’s true. It takes up barely any more space than the MX-5’s soft top, so there’s the same, 150-litre boot, roof up or down. It’s a superbly packaged mechanism, and a quick one at that. Twelve seconds might be about four times as long as it takes on a regular MX-5, but it annihilates its hard-roofed rivals.It’s noticeably quieter than the soft-top too. The car even looks more or less the same – the bootlid’s front edge is 4cm higher and the body cavity a tad bigger, but there’s none of the fat-backsidedness of hatchback-spawned CCs. All you gain is 37kg. Eighteen of that’s the plastic (not metal) hood; the rest is ancillaries.Ah, but, you’re thinking, there’s 37kg sat virtually atop the rear suspension pillars and the body’s not quite as stiff as the regular car’s. Mazda has tweaked suspension settings mildly to make it a teensy bit softer. That has to affect the handling, right?Right. But not by much. It’s the sort of difference you’d feel if you carried a fat passenger or loaded the boot with suitcases. It’s still very much an MX-5. So it’s agile, controllable and, between you and me, not quite as much fun as the old one.Should I buy one? Mazda reckons that 20 percent of British MX-5 buyers will go for the Roadster Coupe. At a £1760 premium – £1200 for the roof, £560 for aircon, don’t be surprised if it’s more than that.

Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

  • 2016 Audi A3 Sportback e-tron UK review
    First Drive
    29 September 2016
    First UK drive finds the facelifted A3 Sportback e-tron remains a first-rate plug-in hybrid that is packed with tech if a little short on driver appeal
  • Citroen C11.2 Puretech 82 Furio
    First Drive
    29 September 2016
    Citroën's city car gets a new sporty-looking trim level, adding visual adornments, but no premium for the 1.2-litre Puretech triple we're driving
  • Mercedes C350e Sport
    First Drive
    28 September 2016
    Petrol-electric C-Class is a surprisingly well-priced alternative to a diesel but not the greatest example of the new ‘PHEV’ breed
  • Car review
    23 September 2016
    Aston kicks off its ‘second century plan’ with an all-new turbo V12 grand tourer
  • Ford Ka+ 1.2 Ti-VCT 85
    First Drive
    22 September 2016
    A rounded, refined and well-sorted bargain supermini – once you’re used to the confusing role redefinition imposed on the once-cheeky Ka