When the Nissan Leaf blazed a trail in the electric car market, we were fed a lot of statistics about how a 100-mile range was enough for more than 75% of all journeys undertaken.

It was a well-sourced statistic that was repeated time and again as more and more car manufacturers launched electric vehicles.

And do you know what? In the case of the Holder family and its Renault Zoe, it’s true. In approaching a year of ownership, never have we had to use a public charging point, because not once have we done a round trip of more than about 60 miles. It helps that we are a two-car family and can therefore plan ahead on which powertrain we use, but most of the time we’re in or around the confines of the M25 and very happy with the electric range we have.

Yet with every generation of electric car, the range is creeping up, with the likes of Audi now saying that their research suggests that customers want 300 miles per charge before the will commit. I’m comparing apples with pears of course - what people want before they commit is not likely to be what they need, but I do wonder if many of us are going to pay a heavy price for the reassurance of this extra mileage.

The next-generation Zoe, widely rumoured to be being unveiled at next week’s Paris motor show, is expected to have a range closer to 200 miles than 100, for instance. So when we come to renew our lease, I’ll presumably face the choice of taking on a car with approximately three times more range than I need. Given the cost of the battery pack has long been cited as the reason electric cars are so expensive, I’m mildly miffed that I’ll be paying for something I’ll never use.