Is the simple Subaru BRZ as effective on the road as early reports suggest it is on track? Matt Saunders finds the answer on the Route Napoleon, with an MX-5 and 370Z in tow.
Weâve come to the Cote dâAzur to find out one thing. Has the Subaru BRZ earned its place at the top table alongside the likes of the Mazda RX-7, Nissan 200SX and Toyota Supra.
All the early signs have been good. Handling-related superlatives flowed after a track test in a prototype last year; just as they did after a circuit session in the Toyota GT 86. But you couldnât say for sure without spending time on really testing roads, could you? Preferably with a couple of other modern Japanese sporting greats along for the ride.
See more pictures of our Subaru BRZ group test
And with the promise of a BRZ on the mountain roads of the Cote dâAzur, a pair of modern Japanese sporting greats is exactly what weâve lined up.
The inclusion of the Mazda MX-5 is justified not only by the uncomplicated amusement value it offers, but also by the fact that it is the worldâs biggest-selling sports car. If the Subaru can match the Mazdaâs for smiles-per-pounds-spent, itâll be doing very well indeed.
Mirroring that âless is moreâ appeal is the Nissan 370Z, which remains one of very few sub-£30k, six-pot, rear-drive performance cars on offer. Could it confirm nagging doubts that the Toyobaruâs 197bhp, four cylinders and 7.5sec 0-60mph arenât sufficient?
How it came to be?
Although both Subaru and Toyota would take credit for the originality and authenticity of their sports car, the fact is neither company could have produced it on its own.
Four years ago, Toyota had the will, the vision and the investment. But nowhere to build it and no capacity to develop it beforehand. Subaru had the production and engineering facilities, many of the mechanical building blocks youâd need for a great sporting rear-driver and the desire for the brand development that such a car could achieve. But without greater potential sales volume, it could never have made the sums work.
Then in 2007, Katsuaki Watanabe, ex-president of Toyota secretly met with Ikuo Mori, president of Subaru parent Fuji Heavy Industries. In 2008, as Toyota announced an increase in its minority stake in FHI, the Toyobaru plan went public. Toyota would design the car, and put up the lionâs share of the finances; Subaru would engineer and develop it, and produce it at its plant in Gunma. They would develop their own marketing strategies, but Toyotaâs bigger cash pot would deliver them the majority of production.
Thatâs how Subaru ended up with a sports car that looks unlike anything else in its line-up â exactly like a modern Toyota sports coupé, in fact. It does have one of Subaruâs inimitable throbbing boxer engines under bonnet; an engine with a massive influence over the motive character of the BRZ. Its size, shape, location and output all make contributions to a dynamic repertoire that makes this car as distinctive as it is effective on the road.
See more pictures of our Subaru BRZ group test
But before probe at the periphery of its range of abilities, there are some static considerations understand. As much as lightness and compactness are key in the modern car-making business, they are also BRZ cornerstones. It measures 4240mm from nose to tail, so itâs within a foot of the length of the Mazda MX-5. More remarkable still, it weighs just 1202kg, or 1239kg if you go for a Premium version like our test car. Our diminutive 2.0-litre MX-5 Coupé Cabriolet â a car held as the most convincing argument for lightness and simplicity in a mass-market sports car â is heavier than our test BRZ by around 10kg.
Our 370Z carries a penalty of almost 300kg compared with the BRZ â something its brawny V6 and wide, 18-inch tyres may struggle to cover.
Equally confusing is the BRZ is the only four-seater here. Theyâre usable, too; big enough for a medium-sized adult on a short hop, which seems a bit of a masterstroke in a car with a longways engine, driven rear wheels and the same wheelbase as a Mini Clubman.
The front seats are comfortable for touring yet supportive for hard driving, and its seating position is spot on. You donât feel constrained in it, as bigger drivers will in the Mazda. Unlike in the Nissan, the pedal and wheel positioning is absolutely perfect.
The BRZâs fascia is functional but does the car credit. It escapes a bargain-basement feel with a tactile sculptural platform of a dashboard, and some uncomplicated, modern design on the climate control console and in the instrument cluster. The Nissanâs feels like a more stylish and special, whereas the Mazdaâs is showing its age. But rich and stylish cabin ambience has never been what the MX-5 is all about, and the BRZ just feels like a slightly larger and newer car from the same mould.
In search of fun
This Subaru is a slow-burner, and in more than one sense. Crawling and bumbling around city streets en route to the epic Route Napoleon, it does little to pique your fun receptors. Itâs an easy car to drive, and fairly comfortable. The chassis is firm but quiet and the damping is a bit hard-nosed over uneven town asphalt, but itâs compliant enough most of the time. Despite its offbeat growl, that atmospheric boxer engine doesnât serve the kind of torque to make the car hint at the amusement you might be having elsewhere. Which is something the Nissan is very adept at.
There are signs â telltale suggestions of the restrained athlete youâve yet to reveal. The BRZâs power steering is one of them. Itâs medium heavy, but even around urban bends and roundabouts, it provides immaculate feedback from the front tyres direct to your palms. You know exactly how much youâre asking those contact patches to do, and how much they could offer. The brake pedal feel is excellent; progressive, easy to modulate, strong but not over-assisted. Proper sports car brakes, these.
When you leave the urban grind and the road empties and starts to climb, however, youâre worried about only one thing: is it quick enough?
The Zed certainly is. You donât need much more than 3000rpm before the Nissanâs 3.7-litre V6 hurls this long-nosed throwback forward with inscrutable urgency. Itâd bolt away from the other two cars down any straight, and on less perfidious old mountain roads than these, it would quite soon be in a completely different département altogether.
But Nissanâs Z-car has always monstered its opposition on bang for your buck. Itâs grip, delicacy and composure that it lacks. Should a 370Z appear in the rear-view mirror of your Subaru BRZ, youâve got every chance of keeping it there providing youâre on the right road. And youâll have a whale of a time in the process.The Subaru needs to be wound to at least 5000rpm before the car will lunge onward like a fully-fledged performance car. Below that, you could even be overtaken by a mid-range Peugeot 205.
See more pictures of our Subaru BRZ group test
Above that, with peak torque chiming in between 6400rpm and 6600rpm, Subaruâs flat four takes is fizzy and flamboyant. Enough to excite the BRZâs driver and enliven its chassis. Enough to make our little Mazda feel distinctly lower-rung, even though itâs still rewarding. But not so much to make you feel irresponsible about giving the BRZ its head on the road.
Exercising the same commitment corner after corner, you discover all that fuss was 100 per cent deserved. A low centre of gravity means roll control is first rate. That enhances the sense of accuracy you get from the BRZâs steering, and contributes to balance and agility of genuinely breathtaking order. Turn-in is instinctive. The BRZ takes no time to settle into a steady cornering state, even under high lateral loads. The engineâs linear power curve gets together with the torque-sensing limited-slip differential to allow you to play with the carâs cornering attitude in a spellbindingly delicate and precise fashion.
This is a sports car first and a fast car second â which is refreshing to report. While the BRZâs limits are impressive, itâs more the breadth and habitability of the margins of its handling that end up holding your imagination hostage. You donât need to goad it. Just drive it with the same smooth composure and exactness that characterises the car vividly. Once youâre on terms with it, it becomes playful, subtle and totally beguiling. You canât help falling for it.
Neither the 370Z nor the MX-5 can thrill at that level. Compared to Subaru, they look like blunt, dull communicators here, outclassed by a new affordable driverâs car of amazing delicacy and extraordinary talent. One that could be the best sports car to come out of Japan since the Honda NSX, and that must be worth £25k from anyone who knows what sunny weekends and great roads were really made for.
Matt Saunders
Enjoy the week's top pictures in our free Car Pics iPad app - great high-res photography (1024x768 pixels) exclusive to the iPad


Join the debate
Add your comment
Re: Subaru BRZ vs Nissan 370Z vs Mazda MX-5
Re: Subaru BRZ vs Nissan 370Z vs Mazda MX-5
Thank you Evo but I'm not all that good! Actually keeping in touch with English is one of the reasons I joined the forum in the first place. I am not speaking it while working and I fear to forget a lot of terms!
Re: Subaru BRZ vs Nissan 370Z vs Mazda MX-5
Impressed you know that word! Wish I could speak Italian as well as you speak English.