From £19,780
Flagship Scirocco is now an oil-burner

Our Verdict

Volkswagen Scirocco

Golf-based coupe comes at a surprisingly tempting price, but can it revive a classic name?

19 September 2010

What is it?

Until the mighty Scirocco R arrives in December, this 2.0 TDI 170 GT version, fitted with the same 168bhp common rail diesel unit found in the Audi TT and Golf GTD, will sit at the top of the range.

The familiar Scirocco assets are in place – comfortable, well-built cabin; engaging looks; keen pricing – but by ramping up the power VW has hopefully endowed the diesel coupe with the performance that is missing from the slightly lethargic 138bhp diesel version recently launched.

What’s it like?

As with all Sciroccos in the range the 170 TDI is a polished all-rounder, which turns fault finding into nit picking. The interior is exceptionally well made for a car of this price, but despite the attractive bespoke seats that belong in an Alfa, it is a little dark and austere. The pillbox rear window restricts visibility and the side windows are shallow due to a 75mm drop in height over the Golf.

On the road it becomes clear that the fitment of the diesel unit substantially changes the character of the Scirocco. Plentiful levels of torque mean this car is easily as quick as the figures suggest, but inevitably it is dominated by its notable mid-range punch. Instead of ringing every last rev out of the Scirocco, as you would the petrol versions, the TDI becomes more of a GT, covering ground swiftly and effortlessly.

The weighting of the electro-mechanical power steering is finely-judged, with linear responses and decent feel. The extra 30kg of the diesel lump up front is barely noticeable, the Scirocco turning in keenly and staying flat and composed through the bends. Lifting off the throttle even allows for the line to be adjusted.

Curiously the adapative ride doesn’t soak up potholes as well as it does in the Golf GTI, which may be a result of the lower stance, jiggling slightly on poor surfaces. However this improves markedly in ‘comfort’ mode.

The 2.0-litre TDI may not sound quite as characterful as in the TT but it is impressively quiet, especially on the motorway, where the Scirocco’s becomes a comfortable and leggy cruiser. A frugal average of 42mpg (VW claims 53.3mpg on the combined cycle), which includes a substantial stint on backroads, making the Scirocco an even more compelling choice.

Should I buy one?

It is difficult to fault the Scirocco TDI, which ticks most of the coupe boxes while delivering impressive economy. But this is a sports car segment and the petrol versions offer a more exciting drive, and in many ways the lighter, more agile 1.4 twincharger version is the pick of the bunch, while still delivering 42.8mpg.

Ollie Stallwood

Join the debate

Comments
12

22 September 2009

How can this be the range topping Scirocco when there is a more powerful, faster petrol version on sale?

22 September 2009

[quote REALZEUS]How can this be the range topping Scirocco when there is a more powerful, faster petrol version on sale?[/quote]

exactly.

i think they mean its the top of the tractor section from vw.

22 September 2009

I actually think this is a bit pricey when you could have a Leon FR and have basically the same car, but that misses the point some what. I don't have a problem with a punchy, real world superior, and economical oil burner in a car that looks very good in my opinion. The CR is a step forward over the PD engine so you don't have such a clatter going on.

22 September 2009

TDi : was-it not for tractors?

22 September 2009

A car for company car drivers more bothered about tax than fun. If you enjoy driving, not posing i reckon you would pick a petrol version, and save a few quid too.

23 September 2009

My, that's ugly.

I read the first line: "As with all Sciroccos in the range the 170 TDI is a polished..." and my mind made an instant "turd" continuation.

Guess I’ll be in a minority of one in that though, this being the Autocar forum.

  • If you want to know about a car, read a forum dedicated to it; that's a real 'long term test' . No manufacturer's warranty, no fleet managers servicing deals, no journalist's name to oil the wheels...

23 September 2009

To me at least, it looks great in the front 'three quarter' view at the top of the article, but utterly terrible in side profile further down.

23 September 2009

"Pillbox rear window" is right and then they go and stick silly looking enormous fixed headrests on top of the rear seats. Why not help what visibility there is by fitted sensible drop-down headrests.

Wonder if they still hide the suspension setting switch behind the gear lever where it is invisible from the driving seat, as it was when I had a test drive when the car was launched. I haven't been back to find out since the lack of rear visibility alone was enough to put me off it.

23 September 2009

you can take out the rear seats, or fold them perhaps.

totaly out is better saves weight and gives you more cargo space.

23 September 2009

The range topper is a diesel? 'nuff said....

Pages

Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

  • Lexus LC500
    Car review
    20 October 2017
    Futuristic Lexus LC coupé mixes the latest technology with an old-school atmospheric V8
  • Maserati Levante S GranSport
    First Drive
    20 October 2017
    Get ready to trade in your diesels: Maserati’s luxury SUV finally gets the engine it’s always needed
  • Jaguar XF Sportbrake TDV6
    First Drive
    19 October 2017
    The handsome Jaguar XF Sportbrake exhibits all the hallmarks that makes the saloon great, and with the silky smooth diesel V6 makes it a compelling choice
  • Volkswagen T-Roc TDI
    First Drive
    19 October 2017
    Volkswagen's new compact crossover has the looks, the engineering and the build quality to be a resounding success, but not with this diesel engine
  • BMW M550i
    First Drive
    19 October 2017
    The all-paw M550i is a fast, effortless mile-muncher, but there's a reason why it won't be sold in the UK