9
New Rolls-Royce retains the character of the original but ups every part of the capability to good effect
Matt Prior
14 September 2020

What is it?

Post-opulent. An unusual way to describe a car that costs £208,000 before you add local taxes and on which you’ll have to pay extra for lambswool floor mats, you might think.

But here we are, with Rolls-Royce Ghost take two, the all-new, second generation of a car that made its debut in 2009 and went on to become the most successful Rolls of all time. A record I suspect it will lose to the Cullinan SUV before long.

Last time around, there were large elements of large BMW beneath the Ghost. BMW owns Rolls-Royce of course, following a highly amusing caper in which Volkswagen thought it had bought the entirety of Rolls-Royce Bentley in the late 1990s, before somebody pointed out that the Rolls-Royce brand didn’t actually belong to the seller.

The particularly good thing about that wheeze is that, two decades on, Rolls-Royces and Bentleys do two very distinct things and Rolls has now grown sufficiently confidently into a brand that can pin each of its models on its own, bespoke platform, without the parent company foundations. The architecture of luxury, they call it.

It’s an all-aluminium structure with some extrusions down its length that makes it relatively simple to produce cars of different lengths, wheelbases, heights and so on – and move some hardware around, to make room, for example, to allow the Ghosts’s tapered rear end. The Cullinan, the Phantom and the Ghost all sit on the platform, and replacements for the coupé and convertible will too.

In the Ghost you find effectively a Cullinan powertrain. That means a 6.75-litre V12 with two turbochargers under the bonnet, making 563bhp and, just as importantly, 627lb ft, developed at, more importantly again, 1600rpm – just 600rpm above idle.

With it driving all four wheels through an eight-speed automatic gearbox, full oomph basically from when you set off. Rolls-Royce says the unit has a Rolls, not BMW, part number, but, well, put it this way: they don’t cast ‘em in Goodwood. I don’t suppose it really matters.

There’s double-wishbone suspension at the front and a multi-link setup at the rear, with adaptive dampers – not that you can change driving modes yourself. Rolls sets it up how it likes because, honestly, owners don’t want to. This is a concierge of a car, existing basically to make your life more pleasant and easier.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Find an Autocar review

Back to top

There’s a 12V active anti-roll bar at the back, which takes inputs from forward-facing cameras; if it sees a shadow or a highlight, it thinks a bump is coming and can slacken right off. The front suspension instead has a mass damper in its efforts to keep the body flat. There are air springs on each corner and rear-wheel steering. Quite a lot of tech, then, but you’re not really meant to know it’s there.

This is quite a big car; at 5546mm long and 2148mm wide (including the mirrors), it’s a touch bigger than the old one. Not so differently sized inside, though, because there’s more insulation in the doors. But unsurprisingly, it's wide enough and long enough for tall occupants to sit behind tall occupants.

Tall drivers might find the B-pillar restricts visibility, mind, and optional blinds restrict rear passengers' views out too even when they’re retracted; if you want to be hidden, that’s the rub.

What's it like?

Some people want to be seen, others don’t. There are, I suppose, different types of luxury. And while the full-fat Rolls, the Phantom preferred by the world’s most exuberant high-rollers, is outlandish and extravagant and opulent in the extreme, Ghost buyers are – remember these things are relative – more discreet.

In Rolls terms, discreet means that there’s less obvious stitching on the leather and the Ghost does without the Phantom’s glass-fronted ‘gallery’ on the dashboard. Instead, there’s a rather sweet Ghost nameplate backed with little glowing stars. I promise that looks better than I’ve just made it sound.

Fit and finish is great and materials choice is terrific, too – although I wouldn’t object to analogue rather than digital dials. The metal air vents ting pleasingly, ambient lighting is artfully done and, well, the short of it is that, post-opulant or not, it’s a Rolls-Royce and you’ll find it very comfortable.

It's also very quiet. Fancy things have been tuned acoustically; the boot was a bit boomy, but opening up vent spaces cured that, and there’s 100kg of soundproofing in total (the Phantom has 130kg). But the important thing to know is that if you’re sitting in the back seat at motorway speeds, you can have a hushed conversation with the person in the front, because the loudest noise otherwise is their hands on the steering wheel. I wouldn’t mind if that were bigger and thinner of rim, more Phantom-like, but I’m being pernickety. You have to be.

Back to top

What differentiates customers of a Phantom and customers of the Ghost is how, and how much, they want to shout about their wealth. Where they don’t necessarily want a difference is in how their cars drive.

There is a differentiation between the two; it would be wrong if there wasn’t. But both have an inherent relaxed character that’s enjoyable while being freed from the shackles and compromises of some competitors. A big Bentley, for example, has to do all but 200mph and be a sports car as well as a luxury car. It’s very good at attempting to do them all of those things, too, hence fast-acting, strong-force 48V active anti-roll bars to try and control roll but not give a brittle ride. Rolls-Royce just doesn’t mind if there’s more, and lower-frequency, body lean, because it dispenses with any sporting pretence and so it lets the ride breathe more easily.

On the road, then, there's a relaxed gait and some low-frequency float to match the quietness, but less than you find in the Phantom. The Ghost feels a more tightly screwed car than the bigger Rolls, albeit still comfortably in the realms of luxury. Make a quick lane change and the active rear-steer enables a calm mooch across the carriageway and then ties the rear down quickly, whereas the Phantom or a big SUV would wallow in a little steadying movement.

If you’re seeking things to notice, there's a curious, almost lateral shimmy from the rear from time to time, at higher speeds across sharp imperfections. I doubt you would notice this in most cars but, as with a little suspension noise at the front, I guess the silence elsewhere amplifies it. You could always turn up the stereo.

In terms of engagement, the Ghost steers with lightness and moderate speed but brilliant accuracy and a fingertip weight that barely changes. It's odd to say it, but I find that as impressive and engaging as the weightier systems of most sports cars. The steering self centres less strongly than most big cars, but if you’re letting the wheel slip between your fingers, remember that you’re making the loudest noise in the cabin. Best to feed it back gently.

Other control weights are also expertly judged. Given the Ghost is ‘for being driven’ as well as ‘for driving’, Rolls goes to some lengths to make sure it can be brought to a stop, and will step-off again, really smootlhly.

Back to top

You can still make pretty quick progress, I should add – and it’s enjoyable to do it. This is a car that has been limited at 155mph, after all, and I don’t imagine that, despite the 2490kg kerb weight and pretty vast frontal area, it would take too long to get there. Ask for a lot of performance and the engine emits a muted, expensive-sounding growl, while the autobox, whose shifts you can’t make yourself, is responsive. Ask for a more Rolls-steady sedate pace and you’ll probably never even notice the Ghost change gear or hear the engine while you do it.

This powertrain is awfully but deliciously some of the last of the old-school, unelectrified, internal-combusted analogue tech, and while vastly consumptive (the 18.0-18.6mpg / 347-358g/km figures are pretty sobering), ironically this is the closest the internal-combusted car comes to electric driving.

Should I buy one?

My understanding is that we’ll see a fully electrified Rolls some time this decade, and my suspicion is that electric driving will suit a big luxury saloon like this perfectly.

For now, though, the big V12 is the only choice. And if the stamp on the block says Rolls? This time, the character of the rest of the car says the same, too.

Join the debate

Comments
17

14 September 2020

 Starts at £208,000 would be a better way of saying it, and I know a lot of you will disagree, but RR do luxury better than just about anyone for the money.

15 September 2020
Nice review of a stupid looking car.

14 September 2020

The purple hide looks... quite nice, actually. And what a fine car. But it does now seem like a dinosaur. Going electric seems such an obvious move for RR.

14 September 2020

So bloody ugly, and who in their right mind apart from Prince thought Purple was a good idea.. 

14 September 2020
Citytiger wrote:

So bloody ugly, and who in their right mind apart from Prince thought Purple was a good idea.. 

Not keen on the purple interior either or the battleship grey paintwork, which looks fine on an Audi etc, less so on this, but, it is quite handsome, I think, and colours are all choices and to personal tastes etc. Agree with other comments that EV is the way forward for a Rolls.

14 September 2020

Never been RR aficionado, but I really like this car. It just looks wonderful.

As for the now obligatory 'dinosaur' comments, well, people like dianosauus, don't they? So very few RRs are sold, relatively speaking, that going EV is not a really wise move at this point for the brand. The car already weighs north of two and a half tonnes. Add a huge battery, which this car would need to get it going at reaosnable pace, and you literally would have an ocean liner on your hands.

Once bettery technology improves to the point that batteries are light enough and provide genuine 300 miles plus range in realistic driving conditions and can be at least 80% charged under 10 minutges, then we are talking.,

15 September 2020
Overdrive wrote:

Never been RR aficionado, but I really like this car. It just looks wonderful.

As for the now obligatory 'dinosaur' comments, well, people like dianosauus, don't they? So very few RRs are sold, relatively speaking, that going EV is not a really wise move at this point for the brand. The car already weighs north of two and a half tonnes. Add a huge battery, which this car would need to get it going at reaosnable pace, and you literally would have an ocean liner on your hands.

Once bettery technology improves to the point that batteries are light enough and provide genuine 300 miles plus range in realistic driving conditions and can be at least 80% charged under 10 minutges, then we are talking.,

15 September 2020
Rolls Royce have remained at the top for a long long time.
Great job.

15 September 2020

Now that Golf 7 is gone this must be the best looking and most visually balanced 4-door car in production.

The simpler front end is actually an improvement on the near perfect original. The rear end, with the reshaping of the lights, looks proposefully wider too.

 

The interior, disappointing for a Rolls, lacks visual flair.

15 September 2020
abkq wrote:

Now that Golf 7 is gone this must be the best looking and most visually balanced 4-door car in production.

The simpler front end is actually an improvement on the near perfect original. The rear end, with the reshaping of the lights, looks proposefully wider too.

 

The interior, disappointing for a Rolls, lacks visual flair.

Golf 7 was a 3 or 5 door hatchback, and if you think this is visually balanced perhaps you need to readjust your view point, unless you think huge Cpillars that block a large portion of your rear three quarter vision, just like the Golf has had since the mk3 are balanced, the front end with the cheap looking plastic vents below the grill look exactly that cheap, just like they do on numerous BMWs, Audis and Mercedes, there has been no effort to hide the front parking sensors, even though those cheap plastic vents would have been the ideal place, and the trade mark Rolls Royce grill looks too shalow, at a time when everyone else is making grills bigger, RR decide to go smaller and lose the visual impact. 

The 21inch wheels look too small, especially at the rear where there seems to be a lot of air between them and the wheel arch, as if they are hanging down or the ride height has been raised, and the rear reminds me of a C-Class in a jelly mold type of way.    Also from some angles it reminds me of a Lincoln, especially the 2015 Continental Concept, with the front wings from the Lincoln mk9 concept.. 

Pages

Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review