From £18,510
The Mini Paceman is competent enough, but it just doesn’t make enough sense - especially to look at
Nic Cackett
10 November 2012

What is it?

The production version of the Mini Paceman - the three-door offspring of the Countryman we’ve only previously driven in development form. Dubbed, optimistically, a Sports Activity Coupé, BMW insists this is the car to bridge the gap between its family-focused crossover and the now ageing hatchback.

A new design has been penned around the deletion of the Countryman’s rear doors, which necessitates a retooled rear end, including a lowered roof line and altered tailgate. The subtraction continues inside where the standard rear bench has been replaced by Mini’s individual rear seats (formerly an option on the five-door).

Despite sharing all of its running gear with the Countryman, the Paceman’s racier brief means it gets Mini’s sports suspension, dropping the car a further 10mm closer to terra firma. The engines and transmissions are all direct carryovers: the familiar 1.6-litre petrol unit comes in both 121bhp Cooper guise and 181bhp Cooper S format (driven here). 

First drive review: Mini John Cooper Works GP

Similarly, the diesel options are split between the 110bhp 1.6-litre Cooper D and the 141bhp 2.0-litre Cooper SD. Every powerplant (with the exception of the entry-level Cooper) can be mated to Mini’s ALL4 four-wheel-drive system for a premium, although front-wheel-drive variants will form the bulk of sales.

What's it like?

Muddled, as perhaps, it was always destined to be. Welding shut the rear doors is the oldest trick in the manufacturing playbook, but rendering a sportier vibe from a lumpy crossover is considerably more difficult than doing so from a saloon or hatchback. It is this first hurdle which the Paceman doesn’t so much fall at, but ruinously head butt.

Raking the roof line and retooling the tailgate of the Countryman make theoretical sense, but the real-life result is as genetically confused as a germinating tumor. There’s none of the elegant collusion that makes three-door SUV’s such as the Evoque look desirable; instead BMW has seemingly resorted to pulling the high-rise skin taut over an already misconstrued skeleton.

Conventionally, such a subjective appraisal would be beneath us, but so shallow is the Paceman’s appeal that without a stylistic trump card to play, its rationale flounders. It’s obviously less practical to get in and out of than the Countryman, there’s less rear headroom thanks to the new roofline, fewer seats to fill (which don’t even begin to fold flat) and it all comes with a higher price tag.

It’s regrettable, because dynamically, the Paceman - admittedly driven in Mallorca - comes across as a slim improvement on its SUV sibling - and probably not in the way you might expect. Despite unnecessarily bearing a firmer suspension, the car (somewhat inexplicably) accommodates battered roads slightly better than the notoriously wayward Countryman; there’s far less jarring, even with the springs pre-loaded under cornering.

This makes the Mini SUV far less wearing to drive, and its marginally tighter body control allows familiar liberties to be taken with the still very quick steering rack. Teamed in this instance with the more powerful petrol engine, this makes slice-and-dice suburban driving an appropriate cinch and (despite a whining, insistence sonic presence in sixth on a motorway) an acceptable companion beyond.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Find an Autocar review

Back to top

Should I buy one?

The only reason to seriously consider it is if you ‘get’ the stylistic revision in a way we don’t.

Despite a slightly more agreeable behind-the-wheel experience (yet to be played out or confirmed on British roads) the Paceman still feels like a car where you’re being asked to pay considerably more for less. 

If you’re insistent on owning a four-metre-long Mini SUV, we’d recommend you continue to opt for the one with five-doors and a whole heft more sense.

Mini Cooper S Paceman

Price £22,355; 0-62mph 7.5sec; Top speed 134mph; Economy 46mpg; CO2 143g/km; Kerb weight 1380kg; Engine four-cylinder, 1598cc, turbocharged, petrol; Power 181bhp at 5500rpm; Torque 192lb ft at 1700-4500rpm; Gearbox 6-spd manual

Join the debate

Comments
29
Add a comment…
mark renaud 31 December 2012

like it !

I like it. I was going to change to a Countryman because there isn't enough shoulder room  and people keep jabbing me in the ribs and clashing shoulders when putting their seatbelts on. Now I will wait for the Paceman and go for the petrol all4. I don't mind that the reviewers critisize the styling. I like it!

 

warren_S3 12 November 2012

Bored of the endless outpourings of Mini variants...

I've driven quite a few Mini variants over the passage of time (original and BMW owned), and I've always felt that the early reviews of the BMW car were slightly sensationalist and over-egged. It's certainly not a bad car (in standard 3 door Cooper S guise), but to me it has always felt like the rose tinted spectacles got in the way of clear objective reviewing pretty much across the motoring press.

Whilst I appreciate what's being said in some of the 'challengers' statements, Nic Cackett is entitled to his opinion as much as any of the rest of us. Few of us are dimwitted enough to take a single view, and therefore guidance from car magazines should be taken as insight rather than fact (as everybodies expectations on 'goodness' will differ!). At least what he writes doesn't always amount to the turgid bilge that just come out of a marketing office from the keyboard of someone who commutes (as opposed to enjoys driving).

When what they write is enough to make you rant then it's time to turn to a different channel!

benzpassionblog 12 November 2012

BMW's One-Two

Looks like not only will BMW with its new MINI Paceman deliver a near fatal blow to JLR/Autocar's poster-child, the Evoque, by undercutting it in price by up to £/$20k, but news today says BMW will use the Detroit motor show(Jan 13, 2013), to present its new X4, which with more space, more efficiency, six-cylinder engine options, and so on, will deliver the knockout blow to the overpriced, overhyped Freelander-in-drag:

http://www.autoweek.com/article/20121109/DETROIT/121109828?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=t.co

http://www.bimmertoday.de/wp-content/uploads/BMW-X4-F26-Rendering-Theophiluschin-13.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Find an Autocar car review