The Mazda CX-3 has style and substance, and deserves consideration for anyone wanting a compact urban SUV. Here’s hoping Mazda gets the price and equipment right

What is it?

The highly anticipated baby brother to the Mazda CX-5 SUV. It joins one of the fastest-growing segments of the new car market: pint-sized crossovers designed for the city rather than the great outdoors.

Huge sales for the Nissan Juke, Vauxhall Mokka and, more recently, the Citröen C4 Cactus prove there's strong demand for high-riding hatchbacks that give a commanding view of the road ahead but can still fit neatly into a tight parking space.

The Mazda CX-3 won't be short of rivals, with new arrivals including the Fiat 500X, Honda HR-V, Jeep Renegade and the new generation Suzuki Vitara.

Underneath, the CX-3 is largely based on the Mazda 2; even the dashboard is the same. The CX-3 is slightly wider than the supermini, although the wheelbase is identical. It has more headroom than a Mazda 3 (which is compromised by its sloping rear roofline), but the CX-3’s 264-litre boot capacity slots between that of the Mazda 2 (250 litres) and Mazda 3 (364 litres).

The CX-3 was designed in Mazda’s styling studio in Japan. When management was shown the full-size clay model for the first time they were reportedly so impressed they simply said “build that”. The styling really does help it stand out, especially at the front, and it's certainly nowhere near as awkward to look at as the Juke or Jeep Renegade.

The interior may be carried over from the Mazda 2 but it’s a classy, relatively roomy design. First impressions, then, are good.

What's it like?

There was a choice of two different engines during our world-first preview drive, held at a demanding private test track about 75 miles south-west of Melbourne. The the special access comes courtesy of the huge boom in Mazda's SUV sales in the Australian market, driven by the CX-5.

The first car we drove came with a 1.5-litre diesel engine (delivering 103bhp and 199lb ft) with on-demand all-wheel drive, fitted to a high-spec CX-3 riding on 18-inch alloys.

The diesel is relatively refined but lacked oomph when moving off from rest. Once you're on the move, though, it keeps up a comfortable pace without much effort, with decent in-gear flexibility and a broad spread of torque. The optional six-speed automatic gearbox changed down gears fairly intuitively for quick bursts of acceleration and overtakes.

There are no official performance or economy figures at this stage, but thanks to its clever Skyactiv fuel saving tech the same motor in the Mazda 2 comes in below 90g/km for CO2, so even with four-wheel drive and an automatic 'box, the CX-3 promises to be a cheap car to run.

The little Mazda strikes a fair balance between nice steering feel and decent ride comfort over bumps, even on the large alloys of our test car. Indeed, the CX-3 drives with the same confidence and stability as a hatchback, and doesn’t have the topsy-turvy body roll or poor composure of some SUVs.

Next up was the 2.0-litre petrol-engined front-wheel-drive version. It certainly felt a lot quicker off the line than the diesel, even though it promises fuel economy of around 50mpg (with the automatic gearbox). It also rode on 16-inch wheels, which gave a more compliant ride, and the steering felt a bit sharper (possibly aided by the slight weight advantage it enjoys over the diesel).

Back to top

Downsides? There aren’t many we could find. Road noise is a common bugbear of Mazdas, and, like its big brother, the CX-3 has its fair share, but after a short drive it's fair to say that refinement is average for the class rather than poor.

The stability control was well sorted, even on a road covered in fine gravel, although when the ESC does step in the intervention felt a little abrupt.

Should I buy one?

The CX-3 has all the ingredients to succeed in the cut-throat world of crossovers. The design, sharp handling and frugal engines all make it worthy of consideration, and it should be a strong contender when it arrives in the UK next summer.

Faced with a choice between the two engines, we'd say go with petrol power all the way, especially if you only plan to drive in town. It’s said to be almost as efficient as the diesel, and will likely be cheaper to buy. The added sweetener is that the petrol CX-3 is more fun to drive, too.

Josh Dowling


Mazda CX-3 Skyactiv-D 1.5

Price From £14,500 (est); 0-62mph 11.0sec (est); Top speed 115mph (est); Economy 58mpg (est); CO2 105g/km; Kerb weight na; Engine 4 cyls, 1497cc, turbodiesel Power 103bhp at 4000rpm, 147lb ft at 1600 to 2500rpm, Gearbox Six-spd automatic

Join the debate

Add a comment…
gazza5 15 December 2014

pug 2008

not a bad car at all - my wife has one - done 3000 miles average 42 mpg and that includes about 2500 miles in town traffic.

Its not built for long motorway journeys but around town its perfectly fine.

275not599 15 December 2014

No official performance or

No official performance or economy figures, and no official price, yet you saddle it with a 31/2 star review. Don't you think you should withhold the stars until you are better informed?
xxxx 14 December 2014


From £14,500, really, the Mazda 3 starts from £17,000 for a manual 1.5 petrol. If you gonna estimate surely you could make a more accurate one. I reckon they're at least £3,000 out for this version