From £28,9408
New Discovery Sport is more polished and practical than the old Freelander, but it might be worth waiting for the new engines

Our Verdict

The Land Rover Discovery Sport
The new Land Rover Discovery Sport is the successor to the Freelander

The Freelander's replacement goes big on prettiness and packaging, and as a result becomes the class leader

Steve Cropley Autocar
5 December 2014

What is it?

People will tell you that the new Land Rover Discovery Sport is a replacement for the Freelander, but there’s far more to it than that. 

It is certainly another Halewood-built off-roader, and a £30k-£40k rival for the BMW X3 and Volvo XC60, but Land Rover has made it longer, fitted five-plus-two seating to its more spacious cabin, borrowed the styling heavily from the Evoque and redefined it as a member of the emerging Discovery family which stresses its versatility and practicality.

Even Gerry McGovern, Land Rover’s design boss and the chief architect of the new model’s sleek new shape agrees. “Others have great design,” he told us. “But Land Rovers need class-leading functionality."

There’s an interesting back-story about the Sport’s arrival. Land Rover’s range of 4x4s has come to be dominated by the Evoque, whose annual sales of 120,000 a year are more than double the originally planned volume.

The Freelander, closely related to the Evoque under the skin, was in danger of being glossed over, not least because its name has little cachet in the US or China. The company also need a more modern-looking model that could fight and beat the X3 and XC60 while continuing to use existing manufacturing processes and share many common components. Enter the Disco Sport.

What's it like?

Though closely related, the Sport is far from identical to an Evoque under the skin. It has the same front suspension and transverse-engined mechanical layout and the steel chassis is nearly identical back to the B-pillar, but there’s a completely new rear structure that extends the Sport’s length (by 91mm) and wheelbase (by 80mm) and introduces a sophisticated new multi-link rear suspension which, along with the extra length, helps preserve interior space.

This means the Sport’s second row of seats can move back and forth, either to make a huge boot or provide class-leading second-row kneeroom close to that of a Range Rover. 

For the first six to eight months of production, the only engine option will be the 188bhp SD4 diesel familiar from the Evoque and Freelander, and also shared with PSA and Ford. This was in our test car, driving through ZF’s silky nine-speed automatic gearbox. Traction has been enhanced by continued improvements to the Terrain Response system that configures throttle, gear selection, torque distribution and ABS/traction control in four different modes according to driving conditions. 

In less than a year’s time the Sport will adopt JLR’s advanced four-cylinder engine range made in its new Wolverhampton works, a move that should improve fuel consumption and cut CO2 emissions. At that stage a two-wheel-drive version will become available, and the entry price will drop from today’s £32,395 for a base manual model to just under £30,000 for the two-wheel-drive version. 

Two things strike you immediately when you slide behind the wheel of the Discovery Sport. One is that there are no reminders of the Freelander; the other is that without aping anything they’ve done already, the design team have made this an obvious Land Rover. Not a Range Rover, a Land Rover.

It’s nicely appointed rather than outright plush. There are three green elliptical badges visible and the theme is logic, not luxury. True, there’s a big centre screen that introduces a new infotainment system, but even that offers new levels of remote-control versatility without making an exhibition of itself. 

The same observations are true of the ultra-comfortable front seats, the surrounding trim and the generously proportioned second row located high enough to give occupants an excellent forward view. The sixth and seventh seats are plainly for kids up to about the age of 12, and they fold into the boot floor when not needed. They appear to take up remarkably little space, though if you have them (and they’re standard on UK models) you have to compromise on a full-size spare wheel.

The ageing 2.2 diesel can be pretty vocal near idle, but it still has a wide envelope of torque expertly deployed with little hesitation by the nine-speed ‘box to give very high-geared (thus quiet) cruising, plus effortless acceleration. Throw in low road noise levels and you have a quiet-cruising machine which makes normal-tone conversation possible even between the first and third-row passengers.

Wind noise isn’t a problem below 100mph and even flat out at 122mph we found the car acceptably quiet. The only real intrusion comes when the diesel is exteneded through the gears. Oh, and there’s a low-rev rumble when pulling top gear on light throttle.

Even Evoque stalwarts admit the Disco Sport has better steering. There’s a new alertness and sensitivity near the straight-ahead, enhanced by the thick-rimmed wheel and further work to harness the subtleties of all-electric power steering. Land Rover engineers say the Sport’s steering purity is enhanced by the superior geometry of the new suspension. It's a bigger car, but the new model feels easier than an Evoque to drive in all but the tightest going.

This isn’t the softest-riding off-roader around; its firm damping does a fair bit to justify the 'Sport' part of the model's name. But it’s also acceptably supple, as we discovered on a section of Belgian pave, and later sprinting along a rutted beach in Denmark. Though the average Disco Sport will do most of its work on-road in towns, Land Rover’s test team say the Sport has even more traction and off-road capability than either a Freelander or an Evoque.

As usual, it feels far more capable off-road than owners will need it to be. We never stranded it in various bouts of sand driving, fording vertically banked streams or rock crawling. Even on motorway tyres the car has terrific traction. 

At the other end of the spectrum, the Discovery Sport can charge along sinuous roads at a pace that belies its high-riding layout. Cornering grip is terrific. There’s a bias towards understeer near the limit but the Disco Sport mostly goes where it is pointed with little body roll, the quick steering helping its feeling of agility.

Should I buy one?

Makes sense to us. The Disco Sport’s fine combination of beauty, versatility and good driving characteristics looks like bringing a new sophistication to this class, and its polished interior, new infotainment system and impressive off-road ability create a pleasing all-round package.

With the old SD4 engine, the launch versions aren’t absolutely top-drawer for low-speed engine refinement and they don’t quite reach BMW X3 standards of low fuel consumption and CO2 output, so business buyers might be well advised to wait.

But it still strikes us that Land Rover’s biggest problem will be what to concentrate on making, when Evoque demand is still so enormously high. But Land Rover has been coping with this problem for three or four years, and it likes it that way.

Land Rover Discovery Sport SE

 Price £34,195; 0-62mph 8.4sec; Top speed 117mph; Economy 44.8mpg; CO2 166g/km; Kerb weight 1863kg; Engine 4 cyls, 2179cc, diesel; Power 187bhp at 3500rpm; Torque 310lb ft at 1750rpm; Gearbox 9-spd automatic

 

Join the debate

Comments
34

5 December 2014
Far more attractive than the Evoque, whose sales it will surely cannibalise. In fact, this looks like a next-gen Evoque - JLR's "Range" and "Land" ranges aren't distinct enough.

5 December 2014
Wait, don't buy the new Freelancer because the engine is a bit pants. But pay more for less and buy the same pants engine for thousands more in a smaller and uglier package ..... of course JLR want Joe Public to keep buying the Evoque.

5 December 2014
What, *the* Gerry McGovern? Who works for Land Rover? That one? Seriously?

5 December 2014
Bigger (more practical), better looking, better driving and cheaper than the Evoque - makes more sense to me!

The way company car tax is going though they really need to pull a gold plated rabbit out the bag on emissions to fully exploit it. On our fleet XC60's with the powerful D4 are really popular.

5 December 2014
......and it will be a welcome addition to the school gates and Lldl car parks.

5 December 2014
A nice very modern SUV which will sell like mad and deservedly so. But it does look very much like a Ford Explorer copy. The people buying it with this "left-over" engine wil ltakea hit when reselling as compared to those who will get it with the new Ingenium engines

GeToD

 

5 December 2014
...that Gerry McGovern was someone who lacked any confidence. But that's what this design says to me. If they want to blow the Germans out of the water then why not develop the distinctive style of the outgoing Disco? As it is, it's got the Evoque-inspired front end combined with a totally generic, already-dated SUV body behind. And that woeful MG6 interior, dear me. Even Steve Cropley could only damn it with faint praise.

It will sell, because it's a good car. Or at least it will be once the new engines arrive, which is an indication that they're still a small player. Performing the Peugeot 308 trick of launching your shiny new car with carry over engines isn't the best start in life.

I thought JLR were going to be a more distinctive alternative to the established market but, if they are, it won't be because of design. This and the new XE shape prove that. Disappointed.


5 December 2014
Interesting looking motor.
Time and further reviews will tell if it really is any good and a quality design.
However. I don't need 7 seats. I need a big flexible boot for dogs, bikes etc. The kind of activity that you would think this design is aiming at.
Not every car goes on the school run and spends its days being driven by parents who drive every where like their hairs on fire and parking in a similar fashion.
I will stick with the old estate car concept then.

MB

5 December 2014
Looks nice, just wished they could have had the new engines from launch.

5 December 2014
New body old engines, hardly the best of plans/marketing, but even when its not so new body new engine, if the rumours are true it will be not so new body already out of date engine thats better than the old one but still not up to the pre-existing new competition.

It will sell buy the shed load, bigger and cheaper than the evoque. Cannot make up my mind whether thats a win/fail or a fail/win scenario.

Pages

Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

  • 2017 Range Rover Velar
    First Drive
    23 July 2017
    The Range Rover Velar is the most road-biased car Land Rover has made. So does it still feel like a proper part of the family?
  • Seat Ibiza
    Car review
    21 July 2017
    A model upon which Seat has staked its future, the new Ibiza must now deliver
  • Honda Clarity FCV
    Car review
    21 July 2017
    Honda’s fuel cell flagship reaches its second generation, but is the world ready?
  • Nissan Qashqai 1.5 dCi 110 N-Connecta 2017 review
    First Drive
    20 July 2017
    A UK drive in Nissan’s crucial crossover shows an update has not cost it any of that which makes it sell so well
  • Seat Ibiza 1.0 MPI
    First Drive
    20 July 2017
    The Seat Ibiza has wowed in other iterations, but how will the entry-level 1.0-litre MPI version stack up in the UK? We've been to north Wales to find out