Under the skin little has changed – or needed to change – though EXs are now offered with only three 2.0-litre turbo Ingenium engines (one 178bhp diesel; petrol units producing 247bhp and 296bhp) and all models get ZF’s efficient, market-leading eight-speed automatic. The highest output engine comes as standard with Jaguar’s unobtrusive intelligent all-wheel-drive system that usually biases torque towards the rear wheels (for handling balance) but directs it forward when rear-wheel grip is limited. According to the maker’s spec, the system adds only 85kg to a full-house XE’s kerb weight (1650kg vs 1565kg) so there’s little change in the car’s feeling of all-conditions agility.
Our 2019 test car was a P300 AWD, a 296bhp edition with the standard all-wheel-drive transmission, capable of a 0-60mph sprint of just 5.4sec, and a governed top speed of 155mph. The XE’s sleekness and low driving position give it the 'cheap F-type' character we’ve spoken of before, especially since the precise, perfectly weighted steering is as good as Jaguar’s best. The car felt instantly familiar alongside our outgoing edition (2wd, 198bhp) except for two key matters: engine response and ride quality.
For a 296bhp engine packing 295lb ft of torque (between 1500rpm and 4500rpm) our sub-1000-mile powertrain felt inert, a serious concern until we remembered previous advice from JLR engineers that this car’s major components – engine, gearbox and AWD system – need a few thousand miles or so to give of their best. That was certainly the case for our outgoing 198bhp version, which felt quick and free-revving when it left us with 10,000 miles on the clock.
Though Jaguar says it has made very few changes to the suspension, the new XE feels more refined and quiet, offering improvements to rolling comfort, to the level of road noise and to the absorption of big bitumen bumps, so common on UK B-roads. Even on 20in wheels and performance-oriented Pirelli P Zero tyres, the car now feels much more premium, and considerably more comfortable over long mileages.
Join the debate
hackjo
The original version was a
This look marginally nicer on the outside but the fundamentally bland shape limits what they can do.
Interior appears much improved but you still have the same bland facia and the new centre console looks cheap. I'd also worry about reliability of those electronics.
Big question, is the build any better? The original version was dreadful.
Capeskin
We have an XE in our family.
TStag
Arguably the car they should
Arguably the car they should have launched. Exterior could have been a bit bolder however.
xxxx
Tweaking
Shame it wasn't like this in the first place. Anyhow one update that might have proved worthwhile was moving the sat nav above the air vents, it's a pet hate of mine.
Still have one in a heart beat over a C class, 3 series or A4 for the looks and positive reviews of the driving experience
The Apprentice
xxxx wrote:
Which is fine if you only have need for a two seater.
LJames
There would be no difficulty
There would be no difficulty choosing between this and its German rivals. Jags downfall has always been its outdated technology and interior design, which most narrow minded buyers were more worried about than superior exterior styling and class-leading dynamics.
In much the same style as the Evoque, they have had a huge revolution on the interior and it can now rest comfortably at the top of the class.
Saqib
Elephant in the room.. dealers
I had the old XE as a hire car and loved the way it drove. When I changed me car, I bought a... BMW 320D M Sport. Why? Mainly because it is not as boring inside, and the drivetrain is more sporty (the XE felt underpowered).But the biggest reason.. Jaguar dealers are like a 80s time warp. I absolutely hate the cream/brown/green showrooms, and the salespeople are gah!!My wife has an Evoque. The car is great for us, but the dealers.. not great.
scotty5
Heads buried in sand?
Jeez, not ANOTHER Jaguar review. For a manufacturer with so few models, they get some exposure on here.
Though the car’s poor sales coincided with a general decline for saloon models, it still mystified the company and dealers alike.
So another glowing review then. And yet again no mention of Jaguar's poor reliability. According to the reliability study that Autocar's sister magazine carried out in late 2018, Jaguar finished 28th out of 31 manufacturers (with their partners in crime LandRover finishing 30th). In the reliability study of specific models, the XE finished 13th out of 14 cars in the Executive class. Perhaps the company along with their dealers have their heads stuck in the sand?
On Sunday I needed to hire a car for a few weeks - I simply asked for a compact to get me from A to B and was given a Seat Leon. When signing the paperwork they asked if I'd like to upgrade and pointed me in the direction of an XE sitting outside - I didn't even bother asking how much, that's how exciting an XE is. To these eyes it still looks like the Honda Accord I bought in 1995, albeit I bet that Honda probably had more space inside.
A whole row of rental fleet cars with an XE in the middle and it didn't stand out. Enough said.
xxxx
scotty5 wrote:
Another review, and like if the 3 series had a major face lift with updated engines Autocar would have ignored it.
Could be worse, the C-Class was worse than the XE in WhatCars reliability 2018 survey.
And like a A4 and 3 series would have stood out.
Leslie Brook
.
Cramped back seats and a small boot. Just occasionally people who buy 4 door saloons do need space for more than the driver. Current A4, 3 series and C Class can be family cars, the XE can't.
Pages
Add your comment