From £26,0659
Petrol executive saloons aren't about to outsell their diesel brethren any time soon - but that doesn't mean they're bad cars, as this XE proves.

Our Verdict

Jaguar XE

Jaguar's first attempt at a compact exec saloon is good - very good. But can the XE hold off the BMW 3 Series and Alfa Romeo Guilia to retain its crown?

  • First Drive

    Jaguar XE 2.0d 240 2017 review

    The all-wheel-drive version of the Jaguar XE gets a new range-topping 236bhp Ingenium diesel engine in a bid to take on the powerful oil-burners from the likes
  • First Drive

    Jaguar XE S 2017 review

    Updated range-topping Jaguar XE gets more power to enhance the appeal of one of the best sub-£55k performance saloons around
Matt Burt
30 April 2015

What is it?

We know Jaguar’s XE is a sound overall package, and that the high-powered diesel makes a lot of sense but the company has been slightly surprised by the high proportion of early retail customers who’ve been choosing the petrol editions. It’s running at 30% - or about double the predicted amount.

So this is our chance to look at the four-cylinder petrol options in more detail. We’re testing the higher-powered of the two engines, which produces 237bhp and 215lb ft between 1750rpm and 4000rpm. Its more modest stablemate - the cheapest way into an XE - has 197bhp and 207lb ft. However, it isn’t actually any cleaner, because the CO2 emissions of both motors are the same, at 179g/km. You can’t have either engine with a manual gearbox, incidentally; it’s the ZF eight-speed automatic or nothing.

Of course, as with Land Rover Discovery Sports using old-school diesel engines while they wait for the shiny Ingenium units that are such stars in the XE, so the Jag’s petrol engines aren’t really brewed up in the firm’s shiny new plant in Wolverhampton. They’re Ford units, made in Valencia; Ingenium petrols are a further year away, allegedly.

Those CO2 emissions mean that only private buyers are going to be interested in the 2.0-litre petrol XEs; fleet customers, or a predicted 98% of them, will stick with diesel. However, if you are a private buyer standing in a dealership with a range of PCP finance deals in front of you, this could look like one of the more appealing options.

What's it like?

Really good fun, in a sophisticated kind of way. The turbo motor has excellent punch from below 2000rpm and pulls strongly right through to beyond 5000rpm. In this 237bhp trim at least, it feels entirely comfortable with a car of the XE’s size - which shouldn’t really surprise, given that it has also done a tour of duty in the Mondeo.

What does catch you out is the refinement. You have to work this motor extremely hard before it borders on the thrashy; in the most part, it spins up willingly and smoothly, and it drops to a background whoosh once you’re up to cruising speeds (wind noise from the side mirrors will drown it out easily). Jaguar has been careful not to mention the Ford connection at all - concerned, perhaps, about people drawing comparisons to the ill-fated X-type; it shouldn’t have been too worried, frankly.

The absence of a manual gearbox won’t appeal to everyone, but the ZF auto can rarely have felt better matched to a Jaguar engine’s torque characteristics. The ratios are nicely judged and while the software could perhaps be a little quicker to kick down, you generally find yourself in the engine’s sweet spot almost all of the time. Switching to the steering wheel-mounted paddles brings a bit more involvement, with rapid shifts that have a slightly pleasing small jolt to them.

The chassis is every bit as peachy as it is on the diesel. Our car was in the Comfort set-up, but the front end still feels fabulously direct. If anything, it can feel a teeny bit darty, as if the rear is just taking a brief moment to gather its thoughts before following the front end’s decisive lead. It’s minor, though; this is a beautifully judged set-up, helped by an electric power steering that feels rock solid around the straight ahead but weights up consistently when you apply lock. No, it’s not the last word in communication but it is precise and very easy to trust; give the XE a suitable B-road to show off its body control and ability to change direction quickly and you’re likely to just enjoy it.

The ride is firm - firm enough to feel some of the road imperfections on Jaguar’s Spanish test route, which makes us think it will feel you should avoid 19in and 20in wheels for the UK. The standard 18-inchers that you get on Portfolio and R-Sport editions should be fine, though.

Should I buy one?

Tricky one, this. Those CO2 emissions mean it's harder to recommend an XE petrol than any of its diesel stablemates. However, if your lifestyle fits - think PCP finance and relatively few miles per year - then we can see why the XE 2.0i 240 will have real appeal. It's every bit the capable, rapid, agile and refined executive saloon - and a perfectly worthy alternative to the BMW 328i.

Jaguar XE 2.0i 240PS Portfolio

Price £33,740; Engine 4 cyls in line, 1999cc, turbocharged petrol; Power 237bhp at 5500rpm; Torque 251lb ft at 1750-4000rpm; Gearbox 8-spd automatic; Kerb weight 1535kg; Top speed 155mph; 0-60mph 6.4sec; Economy 37.7mpg; CO2 rating/tax band 179g/km, 30 per cent

Join the debate

Comments
44

30 April 2015
This looks great in this blue colour, could see this on my drive.

 Offence can only be taken not given- so give it back!

30 April 2015
So, numb steering, firm ride, slow-witted and jolty transmission, engine bordering on thrashy. Sounds like a 4.5 star car.

1 May 2015
Clarkey wrote:

So, numb steering, firm ride, slow-witted and jolty transmission, engine bordering on thrashy. Sounds like a 4.5 star car.

So you wanted to hate this car so much you decided to change the review yourself.... Where does it actually say the engine is bordering on thrashy?

1 May 2015
I suggest you read the review and look for the word 'thrashy'. It is there, I assure you but you seem to have overlooked it in your haste to brand me a hater.

16 June 2015
Clarkey wrote:

I suggest you read the review and look for the word 'thrashy'. It is there, I assure you but you seem to have overlooked it in your haste to brand me a hater.

It says you have to work the engine extremely hard before it even border on thrashy. In your quest to be negative you seemed to have forgotten how to read.

14 June 2015
Crikey Clarkey, do you view everything in life in such a negative, critical way? Even German cars? it's pretty clear that the new XE is a very good car, a view replicated across the motoring press. And perhaps, just perhaps, that is because it is. Still, some people will always buy German regardless I suppose.

EU Referendum now. Let the people speak.

30 April 2015
What happened to all that BS about lightweight?

30 April 2015
What's this? Autocar taking a half star away from the XE?! That must've been tough. :)

On a more serious note, with its sportier handling and firm ride, JLR seem to have targeted the XE more toward the dynamic 3-series than the comfort oriented C-Class.

30 April 2015
Just how did that back end come out of the Jag design studio. Face lifted XF back end - simple and elegant. F-type back end - wonderful rear haunches and narrow light detail. F-Pace back end - as great as the name is awful. XE - just, how? No elegance, nice details or anything. Just lumpy rear lights. Was Mr Callum on holiday, or doing his old car, when this was done? Seriously disappointing ......

 

 

You're not stuck in traffic - you are traffic!!

2 May 2015
Inclined to agree with you. Lights too big and it's rather A4-ish, though the new A4 may soon have moved on (though don't put your money on that. I find Audi exterior resign pretty dreadful these days). The rest of it's fine though. I'm sure they didn't want it looking exactly like the back of the new XF. I also read somewhere, possibly from Ian Callum, that they needed to break up the size of the rear, hence the lights. BUt like I say I'm inclinced to agree. Not a deal breaker though by any means. Reports state it drives and rides beautifully.

EU Referendum now. Let the people speak.

Pages

Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

  • Genesis G70
    First Drive
    22 September 2017
    Based on the Kia Stinger, Genesis' new G70 saloon shows plenty of promising signs that it could be a hit in Europe
  • Lamborghini Aventador S
    First Drive
    22 September 2017
    Still visceral and dramatic as ever, but does the vast number of mechanical changes and tweaks help make the Lamborghini Aventador S more engaging?
  • Renault Koleos
    Car review
    22 September 2017
    Renault’s new crossover sees the Koleos name return, attached to an SUV of a quite different stripe
  • Nissan X-Trail
    First Drive
    21 September 2017
    On our first chance to get the facelifted Nissan X-Trail on UK roads, the petrol proves a viable alternative, although for outright pulling power the 2.0 dCi is the better bet
  • Alfa Romeo Stelvio 2.2d 210
    First Drive
    21 September 2017
    Most powerful diesel version of the Alfa Romeo Stelvio is swift and more frugal than its closest rivals, but makes less sense than the range-topping petrol version