From £9,7158
Punchy three-cylinder Fiesta gets modern dual-clutch automatic transmission; a satisfying and economical small car results

Our Verdict

Ford Fiesta
Fiestas sold in Europe are ostensibly the same as those sold in America and Asia

The seventh-generation Ford Fiesta is the UK's best selling car, helped by frugal engines, handling verve and a big car feel

Steve Cropley Autocar
7 February 2014

What is it?

This is the long-awaited union between Ford’s brilliant and big-selling 1.0-litre three-cylinder EcoBoost engine and its six-speed twin-clutch Powershift automatic — in what is currently the class-leading and top-selling supermini, the Ford Fiesta.

Rivals have been building baby autos for quite a while, but this promises to be one of the best, given the sophistication of its self-shifting gearbox, and the fact that twin-clutch autos are supposed to deliver fuel consumption and CO2 emissions close to manual gearbox versions, if not quite as good.

Importantly, the Powershift’s CO2 figure of 114g/km undercuts that of the top-selling manual Fiesta, the 1.25-litre four cylinder — which helps overturn the presumption that automatic means inefficient.

What's it like?

Mainly, it’s about the powertrain. We already know the EcoBoost engine works brilliantly with Ford’s five-speed manual, but even the best small-capacity engines have a tendency to perform indifferently with self-shifters.

Not this one. Your very first impression will be of how strongly and easily the Powershift Fiesta accelerates from standstill. There’s not a lot of drama, and unless you really bury your foot, there need not be too many revs, either.

The remarkable bottom-end torque of the little powerhouse works perfectly with the gearbox ratios. From lights, you can effortlessly beat the white van man who wants to squeeze you into the gutter.

As speeds rise the car shifts smoothly upward, arriving early into sixth because the torque of the little engine is well up for it. There’s an S (for Sport) setting that keeps the engine revving a little harder, plus a handy rocker switch on the side of the selector knob that lets you change up and down with satisfying ease and speed.

It may be a cheap substitute for steering column paddles, but after you’ve used it a bit, you soon see it has its own merits. In D, the gear you select manually defaults back to normal automatic mode quite soon. In S, the gear you select stays selected unless you move the rocker, or select D on the main lever.

The rest of the Fiesta is very familiar. Our test car had Zetec suspension that offers peerless body control but less-than market-leading surface sensitivity (not helped by the fact that our car had optional 16-inch alloys running 45-series tyres). The steering is terrific, and the car corners with neatness and impressive grip, wet or dry. For keen drivers, it’s a top combination.

The Fiesta’s weak link these days is its interior. The looming array of centre switches and controls isn’t nearly as attractive as some rivals, and the clunky steering wheel “wands” don’t get anywhere near conveying the excellence of the car’s dynamics and sporty exterior.

Many cheaper cars are now better designed, and as Fiesta lovers, we’re impatient for change.

Should I buy one?

If the idea of a satisfying, even exciting, self-shifting supermini floats your boat, then this is plainly the best.

Two caveats: the price is pretty solid, so for a well-equipped version you’ll pay almost as much as you would for a basic edition of the sporty ST. And that interior really isn’t up to snuff against its peers.

Still, the Powershift Fiesta is one of those cars that allows you to enjoy every mile, city, country, back-roads or motorway, and in that sense it’s quite a bargain

Ford Fiesta Zetec 1.0T EcoBoost Powershift

Price £15,145; 0-62mph 11.2sec; Top speed 112mph; Economy 57.7mpg; CO2 114g/km; Kerb weight 1091kg; Engine 3 cyls, 999cc, turbocharged petrol; Power 99bhp at 6000rpm; Torque 125lb ft at 1400-4000rpm; Gearbox 6-spd dual-clutch automatic

Join the debate

Comments
10

7 February 2014
About time Audi had some more rivals in the Twin Clutch area.
It would be so much more desirable if the switch for the gear changes were paddles rather than a switch on the gear lever, Love to know the extra cost £40 at most?? It would be so much more desirable and therefore sell better with a paddle shift.

Can't wait to see it as an option on ST, RS and 1.6 turbo Focus's etc

 

Hydrogen cars just went POP

7 February 2014
Why is there no info as to how economical this car was in the real world..... this is supposed to be its raison d'etre....so what sort of test is this.... curious

GeToD

 

7 February 2014
GeToD wrote:

Why is there no info as to how economical this car was in the real world..... this is supposed to be its raison d'etre....so what sort of test is this.... curious

Have a look at Steve Cropley's blog for details on that

8 February 2014
But how economical is it in the real world compared to rivals? We've heard nothing but how fantastically economical the 1.0 Ecoboost engine is, yet steve managed only 35 mpg on his test. How does that compare to other cars in its class?

The problem for me is that official government figures seem to be quoted in reviews for the Ecoboost as fact and that the engine is brilliant due to its fantastic economy, but the reality is completely different, rendering these reviews irrelevant and misleading.

If you're going to praise an engine for its economy, let's have some real world comparisons.

8 February 2014
They seem to be more realistic for petrols, but not diesels.

They say the Ecoboost Fiesta does 43 (51 ImpMPG) on the highway. Being as its the auto you would think it would be pretty close to that, as the user variable is taken out.

I think the main problem here is a 1 litre Fiesta is over £15000.

--------------------

 

 

7 February 2014
Hope a true manual mode unlike the DSG.

8 February 2014
"Importantly, the Powershift’s CO2 figure of 114g/km undercuts that of the top-selling manual Fiesta, the 1.25-litre four cylinder — which helps overturn the presumption that automatic means inefficient."

What's the point in comparing it to the ancient 1.25? Surely the 1.0 ecoboost man is the car it should be compared to? The manual is free to tax (99g/km) and achieves 65mpg so in that respect, whilst the auto may be impressive, it's not as great as it's made out to be. Moreover that 1.25 you compare this car too costs £13495 - £2250 less. You need to compare like-4-like.

Speaking of MPG, I'm going to have my first drive of a 1.0 ecoboost albeit the manual version but in the larger and heavier Focus. Official figures, 60mpg. Let's see how close Ms Daisy can get to that!

8 February 2014
@legohead I completely agree that the real world mpg is wildly out compared to the lab test results. My previous smart fortwos never achieved the official figures unless driven slowly on a long journey. While manufacturers have nothing to do with the official tests, they are making cars that perform well on them, rather than for real world conditions. Look at what merc are doing in the name to get better figures for the new c-class, and you can see how manufactures are playing the game to their advantage

8 February 2014
@ Superstevie Most manufacturers I think carry out the official tests, but with an official observer to ensure there's no cheating. A few low volume manufacturers and importers rely on independent test organisations such as MIRA or Millbrook to conduct the tests. Not surprisingly the car manufacturers go to great lengths to make sure everything is "optimised" in their favor - and I think this partly explains why their figures exceed what you might get in the real world by a bigger margin. Allowing the car makers to perform these tests is just another flawed part of the procedure.

13 February 2014
I always use the 'urban' figure, which tends not to disappoint.

Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

  • Citroën C3 Aircross
    First Drive
    17 October 2017
    The Citroen C3 Aircross has got funky looks and a charming interior, but it's another small SUV, and another dynamic miss. Numb steering is just one thing keeping it from class best
  • Skoda-Karoq 2.0 TDI 4x4
    First Drive
    16 October 2017
    Diesel version of Skoda’s junior SUV is unobtrusive and undemanding, but we’d still go for the silkier petrol version of the Karoq
  • Audi Q7 e-tron
    First Drive
    16 October 2017
    Expensive and flawed but this understated diesel-electric Audi Q7 has a lot to offer
  • Citroën C3
    First Drive
    16 October 2017
    Is the third gen Citroën C3 ‘fresh and different’ enough to take on its supermini rivals? We spend six months with one to find out
  • BMW X3
    First Drive
    15 October 2017
    A satisfying rework of the X3 that usefully improves its handling, cabin finish, space and connectivity to make this BMW a class front-runner again