From £15,1206
New Ford Ecosport is an improvement on its predecessor, but the small crossover game has moved on significantly, too

Our Verdict

The first-generation Ford EcoSport
The EcoSport is a front-engined, front-wheel-drive compact crossover

Fiesta-based crossover faces stiff competition. Is it up to the task?

  • First Drive

    Ford Ecosport 2018 review

    New Ford Ecosport is an improvement on its predecessor, but the small crossover game has moved on significantly, too
  • First Drive

    2016 Ford Ecosport 1.0 140 Titanium S review

    Ford is steadily improving it's much maligned baby SUV. This 138bhp Titanium S model will complete the revamp when it arrives next June
6 December 2017

What is it?

This is the new Ford Ecosport, which appears broadly similar to the model it replaces but has work to do if it’s to capitalise on the vast sales potential of the supermini-SUV segment.

How much work? Rather a lot, truth be told. Consider that the opening gambit of our road test verdict on the original ‘global’ Ecosport, put upon us in 2014 and built on the same platform as the Fiesta, read: "It’s a been a long time since a new Ford was as bad as the Ecosport".

It wasn’t a judgment we took pleasure in delivering, but the interior felt cheap in a way contrary to the asking price, and when it came to handling and ride, this was a car beset with incurable problems. Flat-footed while at the same time lacking grip, the chassis was criminally under-damped, falling well below the often industry-leading standards set by Ford. Performance was merely adequate at best, too.

Positives were scarce, even if the Ecosport was decently spacious and its raised ride height meant it had a greater wading depth than Land Rover’s all-conquering Defender (we didn’t see that one coming, either).

And so, to the new car, which Ford unsurprisingly sees as something of a fresh start. The cartoonish – ‘cheeky’, Ford calls it – looks remain, although the overall demeanour undoubtedly has a harder edge. The LED daytime running lights are new and frame a large, notably more aggressive grille flanked by piercing headlights. The front and rear bumpers have been tidied up, there are plenty of new paint colours on offer and the designs for the larger wheel options – 17in or 18in – are new (there’s also the option of a boot-mounted spare). In entry-level Zetec trim, the Ecosport still rolls on 16in wheels.

Mechanically, the new Ecosport sports the same basic layout as the original, with a MacPherson strut front axle leading a torsion-beam rear. Ford has, however, now tuned the car ‘specifically for Europeans', so the claim goes. That means the springs, dampers, steering and ESP have been tinkered with to yield – you’d hope – a more composed ride with body control that doesn’t leave you wondering whether Ford has somehow misplaced the engineering staff responsible for satisfyingly sharp Fiesta and Focus hatchbacks.

There are also two major additions for this 2018-spec Ecosport: a new 1.5-litre Ecoblue diesel engine and Ford’s Intelligent All-Wheel Drive system, which can adjust the torque split between the axles to the extent that 50% is directed to the rear almost instantaneously. Alas, you can only get the latter of those technologies if you opt for the former, and AWD cars aren't expected to arrive in Ford showrooms until the middle of 2018.

That new engine develops 124bhp and 221lb ft and is joined by a Ford’s older 1.5-litre TDCi oil-burner, which makes 99bhp and, frankly, wasn’t much cop in the old model, with poor mechanical refinement and equally disheartening fuel economy.

But more people will be lining up a petrol model as uncertainty over the future of diesel mounts, and Ford’s much-admired Ecoboost engine is available in two specifications. There's a 1.0-litre turbocharged three-cylinder unit tuned to deliver either 124bhp or – new for the Ecosport - a range-topping 138bhp. Claimed fuel economy is a combined 54.3mpg for both, though equipping the less powerful engine with the optional six-speed automatic gearbox (unavailable on the more powerful car) drops that dramatically to 48.7mpg.

What's it like?

The interior is a big improvement, with simpler switchgear and a central infotainment screen (6.5in as standard, 8.0in for Titanium and ST-Line models, both with Android Auto and Apple CarPlay) mounted at eye-level. The Ecosport isn't entirely free of the hard, scratchy plastics that blighted its predecessor, though. The seats are softer, more supportive and slightly perched, giving good visibility. A leather steering wheel is standard. Overall, it’s a good start.

The Ecoboost engines are expectedly likeable, too, and although our preference would be for the more powerful variant, the 124bhp version is fit for purpose, even if its 0-62mph time of 12.7sec does seem slow.

The six-speed auto 'box is characterised by perhaps the smallest shift paddles in existence, mounted on the wheel. If you’re merely pottering, the 'box tends to upshift smoothly enough at just beyond 3000rpm, but if you call for a downshift to execute an overtake, there’s often a frustrating pause before the lower ratio is engaged. The issue here is that the three-cylinder engine, while willing enough to rev out, isn’t particularly torque-rich, and so this scenario is a frequent occurrence. The six-speed manual not only remedies this lag but serves up more involvement, making it the better bet.

Now, the chassis. There’s no doubt that Ford’s alterations have improved matters, but the long and short of it is that the Ecosport trails the class-leaders, such as the Seat Arona, by a fair margin when it comes to ride and handling.

Canter along smooth roads with little in the way of direction changes and there’s little to criticise here, apart from an ever-so-slight fidgetiness. Indeed, hook the gearbox into sixth and the car takes well to motorway duties, wind noise from the thin-framed wing mirrors notwithstanding.

However, on smaller, more corrugated roads, the Ecosport crashes over ruts and through compressions, with the suspension then requiring a second bite at the cherry to get the car's tall body back under control. The ride quality also lacks finesse low speeds – town driving, in other words – which is tough to forgive in a supermini-SUV.

Lateral roll is adequately contained, which we couldn’t say for the previous Ecosport, but those hoping for an elevated Fiesta – and with it, you’d imagine, a new dynamic benchmark in the supermini-SUV segment – will be disappointed.

That said, two areas in which the Ecosport is true to Blue Oval type is in its steering, which is nicely weighted, consistent, accurate and surprisingly feelsome, and its brakes, whose level of assistance seems just about right for this kind of car. These make the Ecosport pleasant enough to drive until you’re going quickly enough for the chassis’ issues to surface.

Another first for the Ecosport is the availability of sporty ST-Line trim, which Ford reckons will take 35% of sales. This adds sports suspension, more belligerent bodywork, plenty of dark trim and a few luxuries inside and costs £800 more than the mid-ranking Titanium trim. But while the sports suspension improves matters, it doesn’t raise the chassis out of its inherently soggy state. 

Should I buy one?

The Ecosport was difficult to recommend in its previous incarnation, and while Ford has made gains, the game has moved on commensurately, leaving the Ecosport once again adrift.

Its interior is now a match for any rival, and there’s an impressive array of technology as standard, but the less characterful, more competent Arona looks prettier and rides with the composure and class of a model from a larger segment.

It’s still the class leader and the rival that the Ecosport has failed to match.

Ford Ecosport 1.0 Ecoboost 140

Where Lisbon, Portugal On sale January 2018 Price £17,495 Engine 3cyls, 999cc, turbocharged petrol Power 138bhp at 6000rpm Torque 133lb ft at 1400-4000rpm Gearbox 6-spd manual Kerbweight 1337kg Top speed 116mph 0-62mph 11.8sec Fuel economy 54.3mpg CO2 rating 119g/km Rivals Seat Arona, Renault Captur, Kia Stonic, Citroën C3 Aircross

Join the debate

Comments
14

6 December 2017

it is a lot better looking than before and it was never going to drive like an Arona because it towers over it. An Arona is a gently lifted and stretched Ibiza, this a properly tall thing with a high driving position and ground clearance to match which is why some people buy these things in the first place surely? Not saying that I want one but...

6 December 2017
TBH an ape could have made an improvement to this shit box. Got to be a candidate for the worst car on sale. The contempt Ford has for its customers knows no bounds. Also makes a mockery of AC's star rating, 3 stars for this? An Alfa Stelvio recently received the same rating. Comedy.

6 December 2017
A terrible terrible name for a car.

6 December 2017

Struggled to find the comment in the orginal review about "how bad the Ecosport" but did read "In such a competitive market sector, though, Ford has made the EcoSport stand out in key areas, particularly with its agreeable (but not dynamic) driving experience, pleasant urban manners and above-par interior space."

Which makes me think it's only OK for Autocar to slam a car when it's failed but not on a first drive with Ford paying for the hotel

 

Hydrogen cars just went POP

6 December 2017

Just found the other full review, although my point stands for the first drive where it got half a star more than this Ecosport first drive. I hold my hands up

 

Hydrogen cars just went POP

6 December 2017

Everyone knows this is the worst Ford since the bug eyed Scorpio.

 

It will do Ford no favours trying to sell this inferior, ugly heap.

 

Go away and start again.

 

We know Ford can make great cars - Fiesta, Focus & Mondeo for example.

 

Must do better.

Steam cars are due a revival.

6 December 2017

Simply on looks alone you just sensed the EcoSport wasn't going to be great. And while this revision appears to have improved things greatly (which tells you how bad it was originally!) including its looks, it's still a desperately average car at best and it still looks awful IMO. I would go as far to say it's probably the worst car on sale in the UK, something that hasn't been said about a Ford probably since the 1990 Escort. Ford should just kill off the EcoSport and try again with a new model based on the new Fiesta. Come on Ford, get your mojo and excellence of the 1990s and 2000s back, you can do so much better than this pile of rubbish.

6 December 2017
Lanehogger wrote:

Simply on looks alone you just sensed the EcoSport wasn't going to be great. And while this revision appears to have improved things greatly (which tells you how bad it was originally!) including its looks, it's still a desperately average car at best and it still looks awful IMO. I would go as far to say it's probably the worst car on sale in the UK, something that hasn't been said about a Ford probably since the 1990 Escort. Ford should just kill off the EcoSport and try again with a new model based on the new Fiesta. Come on Ford, get your mojo and excellence of the 1990s and 2000s back, you can do so much better than this pile of rubbish.

No, the worse car(s) on sale in the UK today are the BMW 1 Series and Mercedes A Class, cars that aren't dynamically good, cars that aren't refined, cars that are cramped, cars that are unreliable and cars with low rent interior materials. They merely sell well due to their badge.

6 December 2017

...god wtf is that cataclysmic horrendous monstrosity. Get it off my television now!

Ford: stop it.

6 December 2017

Sorry but I'm not sure why Ford have bothered updating the Eco Sport again,it's still nothing that special the introduction of the new engine and the availibility of an AWD version is too little too late. The asking price of well over £17k is beyond belief especially when you consider it's built in India, £ for £ the Ssongyang Tivoli or even the MG ZS is a much better prospect than this, if Ford is serious about selling this knocking four grand off the sticker price might be a start

Pages

Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

  • Vauxhall Viva Rocks
    The Vauxhall Viva Rocks will sit at the top of the city car range
    First Drive
    15 December 2017
    Vauxhall's city car gets an urban SUV makeover in a bid to court younger buyers. Is that enough to turn it into a Suzuki Ignis beater?
  • Volkswagen T-Roc 2.0 TSI
    First Drive
    15 December 2017
    Do 187bhp and 4Motion all-wheel drive make the current top-spec T-Roc exciting to drive?
  • Nissan Micra 1.0
    First Drive
    15 December 2017
    Nissan plugs the gap in its Micra range with a naturally aspirated 1.0-litre petrol engine, but is it good enough to unseat the Ford Fiesta, Seat Ibiza and Volkswagen Polo equivalents?
  • Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio
    First Drive
    15 December 2017
    The super-saloon version of Alfa’s long-awaited M3 rival has already wowed our road testers, but what’s it like to live with?
  • Lexus LS 500h
    First Drive
    14 December 2017
    New flagship saloon from Lexus provides a luxury interior to rival the best but comes up short due to its hybrid powertrain