From £30,2508
The BMW i3s receives more power, lower suspension and bigger wheels than the regular i3, adding some keenness to drive to the already funky compact electric car
Matt Prior
5 December 2017

What is it?

The makers of 'the ultimate driving machine' perhaps felt they could cut themselves some slack when they made the BMW i3. The electrically driven small premium model is one of the most interesting cars on sale to sit in, be around and examine, but has not hitherto been terribly exciting to drive.

Three years on from its launch, here is the BMW i3s: faster, lower, a bit wider and with 'S' in its name, which as we all know is shorthand for sport. Nobody ever added that letter to a car’s name while trying to imply it was slower or more sensible. 

There is meant to be more 'ultimate driving machine' to the i3s, then, so it has an additional 13bhp (now reaching 181bhp) and 15lb ft (now at 199lb ft) over the conventional i3, although it is backed by the same 33.2kWh battery. You can still have it as a pure electric vehicle or with a 650cc twin-cylinder range-extending generator, which adds easily refillable range and 120kg.

More significant, though, when it comes to the way the i3s drives, is the fact that it rides 10mm lower than a regular i3, has a 40mm wider track (and diddy wheel arch extensions to accommodate it) and rides on larger wheels and tyres. There is now 195/55 profile rubber on 20in rims, rather than 155/70in tyres on 19s - something you suspect will make the biggest difference to the ride and handling.

Elsewhere, the i3s package remains much the same. It’s a rear-engined, rear-motored, rear-drive vehicle with a funky interior, constructed in places from unusual materials. This model, though, gets a new 10.3in infotainment display, with BMW’s latest software. 


Find an Autocar review

Back to top

What's it like?

Our test was of a regular i30s, not the range-extended version, and it’s certainly more fun than the standard i3. I don’t think it’s controversial to say that ‘fun’ and ‘EV’ are phrases that don’t sit easily next to each other, but the i3s’s extra keenness is evident from the off. 

There are recalibrated spring and dampers settings and steering (and stability control) to get the best out of a car that now grips harder, and whose front end resists skipping gently across surfaces much better than it did before. 

With bigger wheels, lower-profile tyres and lower suspension, you might expect the ride to suffer – and you’d be right, I’m afraid. It has been a while since I drove a standard i3, so I can’t make a back-to-back judgement, but around town the i3s is pretty firm. It’s not uncomfortable and it takes the edges off hard lumps, but it’s tall and, even with a lowish centre of gravity, BMW has had to make a compromise between body lean and control versus ride comfort, and obviously decided that keener is best. And if you don’t like that? Well, the regular i3 remains on sale, too.

Performance is good. Motor response is incredibly linear, there’s strong torque from standstill and acceleration from zero to 62mph is a claimed 6.9sec. Not that you’ll want to stay up at that speed for vast amounts of time, because lengthy high-speed running is what tends to cane the range of electric vehicles. The official European test cycle range is quoted at 174 miles for the i3s, 12 miles less than standard i3, but BMW predicts a real-world range of 125 miles, which seems about right by our testing. Bear in mind that it’ll be less than that when it’s cold.

Inside, there are a few new surface treatments, but the overall ambience remains coolly confident, with BMW’s excellent ergonomics accompanying a style that’s more exuberant than your regular BMW. It’s airy, too, with good visibility. And it gets a lot into quite a small space; it’s less than four metres long, but its rearward opening doors give decent access, and its boot space of 260-1100 litres is on a par with most superminis. 

Should I buy one?

The i3 may be supermini-sized, but its price isn’t. The i3 remains, at around £30k, a premium choice; but its part-composite construction is clever and its interior feels classy. After your electric vehicle rebate (running at £4500 as I write), an i3s is a £32,475 car, or £35,625 with the range-extender that would hugely improve its usability by adding up to 93 miles to its between-fills range and means you can refuel on the go.

Back to top

Only you’ll know if you need that or not, but 60% of i3 buyers think it’s worth having. I also don’t know whether you buy an electric car because it’s nice to drive. But I can say that, in 'S' form, the i3 is now more enjoyable than any other EV bar an i8, a Tesla Model S with ‘ludicrous’ mode engaged or a Nissan Leaf on plastic rear tyres. For that reason alone, it has become our favourite version of one of our favourite EVs.

BMW i3s

Where Portugal On sale Now Price £36,975 Engine electric motor Power 181bhp Torque 199lb ft Gearbox NA Kerbweight 1265kg Top speed 100mph 0-62mph 6.9sec Fuel economy NA CO2/BIK 0, 9% Rivals Renault Zoe, Nissan Leaf

Join the debate


5 December 2017

I've road tested one - not the s admittedly - but I just can't get beyond the price. It's dead good to look at, it's exciting to be in, I've got solar panels so I could, perhaps drive for nothing but - jeez £35k! Sorry, you can get a Golf with similar values and performance for about half of that - and it will be worth more in two year's time, I'd guess. Sorry I'm just not that green. It's the only electric car I'd even think about - but no, not a hope.

5 December 2017
In the days I used to habitat the rapid chargers I saw many I3's. One and all driven by the well to do pensioners, you know the sort, nicely off middle management early retirees with a good pot and an elegant wife. They seemed drawn to its quirky nature and the (no longer) free charging as they had time on their hands - fuel for free, more money for a nice pub lunch on your day trip. The sporting pretensions of owning a 'BMW' also seemed to appeal, as a reminder that retirement could be fun and doesn't mean you’re dead. - However I can't imagine a rock hard 'Sport' version being of much interest to a clientele suffering golfers back. The concept is good but they need to make something a bit bigger and more practical perhaps with a 40 something kw/h battery and accept any 0 to 60 the right side of 10 seconds is ample.

5 December 2017

my arse, BMW havent been capable of that for well over a decade. 

6 December 2017

So I have nothing to say to those who hate it - nothing will change their minds.

it is, undeniably, fugly. If you buy one it has to be “Fluid Black” or else the bonnet won’t match the rest of the car (I suppose you could always choose another colour and get the bonnet sprayed to match.)

But tell me where else you can buy a carbon fibre bodied car with rear engine/rear wheel drive for such a low price? They’re AUD 90k (£55k) here, btw, and selling modestly well now - the dealers say they’ll only order the “S” because it’s more or less the same price and so much better.

At 1200kg it’s about 2/3rds the weight of a Tesla Model 3 much cleverer, better built (assuming 3’s ever get built and they’re as abysmal as Model S in quality) and with a far nicer interior.

Get over the looks and it’s irresistible!


6 December 2017

You're well off on the weight, the Model 3 isn't 1800kg.

The Model 3 would also eat it for breakfast on pace and it'll do nearly 200 miles on a charge opposed to 125 (BMW figure). I believe where the Model 3 and i3 are sold, the US, the Model 3 is cheaper which explains why the i3 sales are falling off a cliff!

The i3 is best compared to the newest Nissan Leaf in which is does OK

7 December 2017
xxxx wrote:

You're well off on the weight, the Model 3 isn't 1800kg.

The Model 3 would also eat it for breakfast on pace and it'll do nearly 200 miles on a charge opposed to 125 (BMW figure). I believe where the Model 3 and i3 are sold, the US, the Model 3 is cheaper which explains why the i3 sales are falling off a cliff!

The i3 is best compared to the newest Nissan Leaf in which is does OK

Totally agree re; the bolt and tesla, thing is the tesla is years away from uk sales and the bolt isnt available. The issue I have with this i3s is that it hasnt improved on the electric side of things in any way, infact by having wider tyres and a more powerful motor it has probably reduced the originals range and the original wasnt tardy so more power wasnt really required. Doesnt seem like progress to me, I have driven an original and was very impressed and found it a fun drive, mostly admittedly because of its powertrain, but I didnt think, this needs lowering and stiffening with fat tyres to be any good, this is a version that should have been available from the off, a few years down the line and it seems to me to be a wasted opportunity as it should have come with increased range.

6 December 2017
Aussierob wrote:

it is, undeniably, fugly.


No. I deny it. It is very beautiful.

6 December 2017

I ran one for 25,000km when I lived near Zurich. The metered cost of my (all hydro-generated) electricity was about £350. In the city the small turning circuit was perfect and it had enough 'zip' even up to the 120 km/h speed limit on the motorway.

Mine was a BEV and I would see no reason having the range extender if it would be a second car. 

6 December 2017

But not a good seller even by EV standards and this version won't improve matters. Problem is the Bolt or new Leaf are by far a better value, then there's the Model 3 which at least 400,000 people are waiting for.

I know some of these competitors aren't available in the UK but in the US the Bolt outsells is now outselling it by 9-1 despite supply problems.

BMW need to move on to the next step soon because 125 mile £32,000 i3's have been surpassed!

6 December 2017

....only two seats in the back - about as much use as mudflaps on a turtle to families. No sale here.


Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review