​VW’s Scirocco Mk3 is a sportier Golf in cooler-looking clothes and priced from £3500. We run through the all-turbo line-up and reveals what to look out for
19 April 2018

Now here’s a tough choice: a VW Golf 2.0 GTI Mk5, the version Andrew Frankel described in Autocar as having “more than 80% of the ability of the best front-drive hatch in the world [the current Mk7] for less than 20% of the money”, or its sister car, the Scirocco Mk3?

Difficult? If you like driving, probably not: it’s the Golf. Prices start at around £2500 for early 2005 cars and don’t stop until £12,000 for a low-mileage, 08-reg Edition 30.

However, if you like a little more flair, courtesy of a longer, lower and wider coupé body (yes, the rear cabin is a squeeze), a broader range of engines and, well, something less ‘historic’, the Scirocco Mk3 it must be. Based on the Golf Mk5, it landed in 2008 and was killed off only at the end of last year.

Initially, power was provided by a 194bhp 2.0 TSI petrol engine but that was soon joined by a 156bhp 1.4 TSI petrol and a pair of 2.0-litre TDI diesels doling out 136bhp and 166bhp. All were available with manual or DSG dual-clutch automatic gearboxes.

The DSG is a quick-changing ’box good for keeping the engines, all of them turbocharged, spinning in their sweet spot when occasion demands. However, the mechatronic control unit can play up. Gearbox experts reckon VW had sorted the problem by 2012. Feel for a juddery take-off, although even a healthy DSG can feel hesitant from launch. As for suspension, dynamic chassis control (DCC), offering Comfort, Normal and Sport modes, was an option. In 2009, power for the 2.0 TSI rose to 204bhp but the big news was the arrival of the Scirocco R.

It used a different four-cylinder turbo petrol engine from the standard 2.0-litre with an uprated turbo and intercooler to give 261bhp and 258lb ft. The car was still only front- wheel-drive, although an electronic differential boosted traction. At the other extreme, a 118bhp version of the 1.4 petrol arrived shortly after.

At the same time, the model gained the Golf Mk6’s smarter dials and steering wheel. In 2011, it got that car’s integrated climate control system. The 2014 facelift brought new lights, a smarter front bumper, and uprated petrol and diesel engines. Finally, in 2016, a GTS version was launched with an uprated 214bhp 2.0 TSI motor.

From the off, there were two trims, standard and GT, joined later by top-spec R and intermediate R-line. Price-wise, there are three main Scirocco price points today: around £7500, £10,500 and £13,500, this last one dominated by former PCP cars with low mileages and solid histories.

There are lots of diesels around, but if you’re tempted, haggle hard because their values are falling fast. A better plan is to seek out a 2.0 GT or R. You can pay up to £30,000 for final Black Edition cars but bear in mind they’re a 10-year-old design under all that run-out kit – and an early 13-reg Golf GTI Mk7 starts at half the money.

John Evans

How to get one in your garage: 

An expert’s view: Phill Jarrett, sciroccocentral.co.uk - “I’m on my second Scirocco, a 2.0 R. It has a TFSI engine where all the other petrols are TSIs. However, the engine cover still says TSI. I love the Scirocco’s styling: it’s unusual and really stands out. Of course, it has its issues. The TSI can suffer broken timing chains (the TFSI has a belt), so get it changed at the scheduled interval. The coil packs can fail, causing misfiring, but it’s a relatively inexpensive fix. The 156bhp 1.4 can drop a piston. That’s a bit more expensive and occasionally terminal.”

Buyer beware:

ENGINE - On the 2.0 TSI, check for positive crankcase ventilation by removing the dipstick while the engine is running. If the engine stutters, it’s okay, but if it runs smoothly, it has failed. Engine not making full boost? Check the dump valve diaphragm isn’t split. The 1.4 TFSI can suffer misfiring issues that can wreck the engine.

TRANSMISSION - On manual versions, check second gear engages smoothly and the clutch is quiet. Tales of poor reliability plague VW’s DSG auto ’box. Most specialists reckon post-2012 cars are okay but, even so, feel for a lurch on take-off and walk away if it goes to limp-home mode. Ensure the oil and filter were changed at 40,000 miles.

STEERING AND SUSPENSION - Check the rear suspension for oil leaks and, where it’s fitted, that the dynamic suspension functions in all three modes. Inspect tyres for uneven wear, suggesting impact damage. The steering can be noisy at low speeds.

BODYWORK - As the Category N write-offs at the cheaper end of the market testify, the Scirocco is a sports car that can fall into inexperienced hands, so check for fresh paint and uneven panel gaps. Rear three-quarter visibility is poor so look for rear bumper damage. Check early cars for rusty hatch strut mounts. Check for misty headlights and tail-lights, and torn rubber door seals where they freeze to windows.

INTERIOR - Hard-wearing but squeaks and rattles caused by the firm suspension aren’t unknown. Check the Bluetooth system.

Also worth knowing...

Bought a used Scirocco that has done less than 100,000 miles but worried it might go pop? Take out a 12-month warranty from VW. For a 2009-reg 2.0 TSI with 74k miles, a £250 excess and an annual limit of 15,000 miles, all-component cover is £548.

How much to spend:

£3500-£6995 - Early examples of all engines at this age. Lots of petrols around 100k miles plus a sprinkling of diesels around 120k.

£7000-£9995 - Stacks of cars, many up to 2012-reg. Petrols and diesels around 75k-100k miles. Huge choice of lower-mileage 2011-reg cars around £9000.

£10,000-£12,995 - Take your pick of low-mileage 2012-2014 cars.

£13,000-£15,995 - Ex-PCP cars registered in 2014-2016, fully loaded and with low mileages and full histories. Haggle hard.

£16,000 AND ABOVE - Lots of late-plate cars, rising to £30k.

One we found:

VW SCIROCCO 2.0 TSI GT, 2008/58, 78K MILES, £6995 This dealer-sale car has full VW service history and a three-month warranty. Check the timing belt, tensioner and water pump were changed in 2012. The interval is four years/80k miles. Climate control, unmarked 18in alloys, leather steering wheel – it’s all here.

Read more

Volkswagen Scirocco review 

Volkswagen Golf review 

Volkswagen Polo review

Our Verdict

Volkswagen Scirocco

Golf-based coupe comes at a surprisingly tempting price, but can it revive a classic name?

Join the debate

Comments
14

19 April 2018

Hmmmm

Avoid the twin charge 1.4 engine as it’s terribly unreliable and expensive to fix.

Avoid the 2.0tdi especially if it’s had the emissions fix and also dealers will be keen to fit the fix if you take it to them to service.

The 2.0tfsi is known for worn piston rings and burning oil requiring repair, also prone to coking up causing lumpy idle and cylinder head off job to remove it.

 

 

19 April 2018
Jimbbobw1977 wrote:

Hmmmm

Avoid the twin charge 1.4 engine as it’s terribly unreliable and expensive to fix.

Avoid the 2.0tdi especially if it’s had the emissions fix and also dealers will be keen to fit the fix if you take it to them to service.

The 2.0tfsi is known for worn piston rings and burning oil requiring repair, also prone to coking up causing lumpy idle and cylinder head off job to remove it.

 

 

I don't understand. Everyone buys German because they are "reliable".

19 April 2018
Jimbbobw1977 wrote:

Hmmmm

Avoid the twin charge 1.4 engine as it’s terribly unreliable and expensive to fix.

Avoid the 2.0tdi especially if it’s had the emissions fix and also dealers will be keen to fit the fix if you take it to them to service.

The 2.0tfsi is known for worn piston rings and burning oil requiring repair, also prone to coking up causing lumpy idle and cylinder head off job to remove it.

 

 

twin charge???.dont do a electric verson mate!!!
All volkswagons brakedown. Ford much better.No problems with me escort ever.

19 April 2018
sbagnall wrote:
Jimbbobw1977 wrote:

Hmmmm

Avoid the twin charge 1.4 engine as it’s terribly unreliable and expensive to fix.

Avoid the 2.0tdi especially if it’s had the emissions fix and also dealers will be keen to fit the fix if you take it to them to service.

The 2.0tfsi is known for worn piston rings and burning oil requiring repair, also prone to coking up causing lumpy idle and cylinder head off job to remove it.

 

 

twin charge???.dont do a electric verson mate!!! All volkswagons brakedown. Ford much better.No problems with me escort ever.

twin thing being the super charged and turbo charged engine google it! 

19 April 2018
Jimbbobw1977 wrote:

sbagnall wrote:
Jimbbobw1977 wrote:

Hmmmm

Avoid the twin charge 1.4 engine as it’s terribly unreliable and expensive to fix.

Avoid the 2.0tdi especially if it’s had the emissions fix and also dealers will be keen to fit the fix if you take it to them to service.

The 2.0tfsi is known for worn piston rings and burning oil requiring repair, also prone to coking up causing lumpy idle and cylinder head off job to remove it.

 

 

twin charge???.dont do a electric verson mate!!! All volkswagons brakedown. Ford much better.No problems with me escort ever.

twin thing being the super charged and turbo charged engine google it! 

Super charge!!!!! have super chargers for electric fork lifts at work. Use lot of electrical powar dont make electric shirocos mate!!!! look it up . google!!!

19 April 2018
sbagnall wrote:
Jimbbobw1977 wrote:

sbagnall wrote:
Jimbbobw1977 wrote:

Hmmmm

Avoid the twin charge 1.4 engine as it’s terribly unreliable and expensive to fix.

Avoid the 2.0tdi especially if it’s had the emissions fix and also dealers will be keen to fit the fix if you take it to them to service.

The 2.0tfsi is known for worn piston rings and burning oil requiring repair, also prone to coking up causing lumpy idle and cylinder head off job to remove it.

 

 

twin charge???.dont do a electric verson mate!!! All volkswagons brakedown. Ford much better.No problems with me escort ever.

twin thing being the super charged and turbo charged engine google it! 

Super charge!!!!! have super chargers for electric fork lifts at work. Use lot of electrical powar dont make electric shirocos mate!!!! look it up . google!!!

What are you on about? I didn’t say they made an electric Scirocco! The 1.4 twin charge engine had both a turbo and super charger fitted! Nothing to do with electrics 

19 April 2018
Jimbbobw1977 wrote:

sbagnall wrote:
Jimbbobw1977 wrote:

sbagnall wrote:
Jimbbobw1977 wrote:

Hmmmm

Avoid the twin charge 1.4 engine as it’s terribly unreliable and expensive to fix.

Avoid the 2.0tdi especially if it’s had the emissions fix and also dealers will be keen to fit the fix if you take it to them to service.

The 2.0tfsi is known for worn piston rings and burning oil requiring repair, also prone to coking up causing lumpy idle and cylinder head off job to remove it.

 

 

twin charge???.dont do a electric verson mate!!! All volkswagons brakedown. Ford much better.No problems with me escort ever.

twin thing being the super charged and turbo charged engine google it! 

Super charge!!!!! have super chargers for electric fork lifts at work. Use lot of electrical powar dont make electric shirocos mate!!!! look it up . google!!!

What are you on about? I didn’t say they made an electric Scirocco! The 1.4 twin charge engine had both a turbo and super charger fitted! Nothing to do with electrics 

Blimey mate you sycho or summat!!! You talking about chargers they for electric cars mate!!!! 1.4 ??? what?? Kilowats?? that aint gonna power a car mate me fork lift at work more than that. U not got a clue mate!!!!!!¡!¡

19 April 2018

"sportier golf" this was the problem

Earlier Sciroccos and Corrados looked like proper sports coupes, whereas this always just looked like a slightly shorter Golf.

A lot of people who wanted a "sportier Golf" ended up with Seat Leons which offered the same practicality as the Golf.

The Scirocco should've rivalled the TT or A5, not the Leon.

19 April 2018

Personally, I never liked the styling of this Scirocco, to me it looked worse than the ordinary Golf, looking squashed, rather than stylish...

19 April 2018
WallMeerkat wrote:

"sportier golf" this was the problem

Earlier Sciroccos and Corrados looked like proper sports coupes, whereas this always just looked like a slightly shorter Golf.

A lot of people who wanted a "sportier Golf" ended up with Seat Leons which offered the same practicality as the Golf.

The Scirocco should've rivalled the TT or A5, not the Leon.

Agree with you, the original sciroccos and the corrado looked different and therefore, to my eyes, more special than the golf, this scirocco looked like a squashed golf and did it's name no justice, I always thought it should be called a golf coupe. Occasionally I see them in certain colours and like them, other times, especially from the rear three quarters, I think they look bloated. No doubt its a great car but I'd rather a mk 2.

Pages

Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

  • Kia Stinger GT S long-term review
    First Drive
    24 May 2018
    This is a 365bhp, rear-drive sports saloon with something to prove. Let’s see if it can
  • Land Rover Discovery
    First Drive
    23 May 2018
    Does the Land Rover Discovery – a vehicle designed to put in the hard yards – cut it as an executive company car? We ran it for seven months to find out
  • Aston Martin Vantage 2018 review hero front
    Car review
    23 May 2018
    Aston Martin’s cheapest model takes a big step up into the 21st century
  • Hyundai i30 N
    Standard spec is good so paint colour is our car’s only option
    First Drive
    22 May 2018
    What’s Hyundai’s first hot hatch and N-brand debutant really like? Let’s find out
  • DS 7 Crossback PureTech 225 2018 review hero front
    First Drive
    22 May 2018
    New petrol engine and top-end Ultra Prestige spec help broaden the Crossback's appeal, but do little to help it stand out in a crowded market