Full story of how the new Range Rover Sport manages is lighter, quicker and more agile than before
Steve Cropley Autocar
26 March 2013

The all-new Range Rover Sport, revealed at the New York motor show, is a model described by Land Rover design boss Gerry McGovern as being “the Porsche 911 of SUVs”.

It’s his way of emphasising the essential difference between the all-new Sport — due in showrooms in September — and the recently launched, considerably larger Range Rover flagship  which shares many of the Sport’s underpinnings but not its essential character. “We’ve taken ride, handling and agility to another level in the Sport,” adds brand boss John Edwards. “This is the fastest, most agile and most responsive Land Rover ever.”

The first-generation Sport rapidly achieved halo status as JLR’s most profitable car, scoring impressive success in the US and especially in Manhattan — hence the decision to unveil the second-generation car at the New York motor show this week. Sales have always been strong; even last year it notched up 56,000 sales, its second-best result to date.

>> Steve Cropley talks to design boss Gerry McGovern

>> Range Rover Sport: first ride impressions

The styling — more sophisticated and sporty than before — makes obvious reference via the floating roof and basic proportions to the ‘senior’ Range Rover, but it is both low and compact in comparison, with greater windscreen rake, a forward control aspect and pronounced wheel arches and haunches that advertise its dynamic priorities. “It’s dramatic and powerful, with immense road presence,” claims McGovern.     

The new Sport has much more in common with the Range Rover than the old model, sharing most of its primary suspension and transmission parts and key components of its aluminium monocoque chassis (adopted instead of the original model’s heavy, old-tech, twin-rail steel chassis). The new car is 62mm longer than the outgoing Sport, but still 149mm shorter than the flagship Range Rover, while its wheelbase is 178mm longer than that of its predecessor. Thus its rear overhang is markedly shorter than before and the redesigned cabin offers both more rear-seat knee room and space for an optional pair of electrically powered, fold-down, child-friendly seats forming a third row, making this a ‘5+2’ SUV for the first time. 

Weight saving is a highlight of the new Sport. Engineers claim a ‘real-world’ saving of around half a tonne over the previous model, though that is calculated by comparing the latest high-output V6 with the previous diesel V8, which offers similar performance. If you compare old and new V6s directly, the difference is a still-impressive 420kg. 

Engineers have also chased efficiency through aerodynamics. The Sport has movable vanes in its cooling system to cut drag on the move, plus near-flush glazing and a smooth underfloor panel to reduce the drag coefficient to 0.34.

>> Steve Cropley talks to design boss Gerry McGovern

>> Range Rover Sport: first ride impressions

At launch, the Sport will be offered with a choice of two engines: a 288bhp 3.0 SDV6 diesel and a 503bhp supercharged 5.0-litre petrol V8. These will be joined next year by a 254bhp TDV6 diesel and a 334bhp 4.4-litre SDV8 ‘super-diesel’ with a 6.5sec 0-60mph time. Later in 2014 we’ll see a turbocharged 2.0-litre petrol engine option — broadly similar in performance to the outgoing V8 diesel.

These engines (all of which incorporate stop-start) send their power through an eight-speed ZF automatic gearbox to a permanent 4x4 system. But in a big break with the past, the Sport will be offered either with a two-speed transfer case that offers the traditional high range and low range and a 50/50 front/rear torque split, or a single-speed transfer case with a default 42/58 per cent torque split to give a rear-drive bias for sharper on-road handling. 

Towards the end of 2014, Land Rover promises to deliver a “highly innovative” diesel-electric hybrid version of the Sport that will emit only 169g/km of CO2. 

The suspension features air springs and uses many of the same lightweight components as the new Range Rover, but the rates of the springs and continuously variable dampers are biased much more towards handling than the Range Rover’s luxury-focused set-up, and there’s a new Dynamic setting in the Terrain Response menu to best configure the car for energetic on-road driving. Variable-ratio electric power steering is adopted, with its gearing sharpened to three turns between locks.

>> Steve Cropley talks to design boss Gerry McGovern

>> Range Rover Sport: first ride impressions

The whole chassis bristles with electronic driver aids, including roll stability control, corner brake control and engine-drag torque control to go with the more familiar hill descent control, stability control and hill-start assist.

The interior draws much from the conventions established by the previous Range Rover Sport model: driver-orientated controls, slightly lower driving position than the Range Rover (by about 20mm) and a high and very prominent centre console, all of which help to give the whole thing a sporting aspect. But there’s much progress in the execution, which is more sophisticated in design, includes new kit like an optional head-up display, simplifies the controls and generally reaches a higher level of quality that’s perceptible as soon as you experience it. McGovern cites “cleaner, purer surfaces”, and the materials quality has taken another big step forward. What’s more, 

there’s much more choice for owners: lots of colours and textures and no fewer than 11 designer-endorsed ‘themes’.

At launch, the SDV6 will cost between £59,995 and £74,995, but the TDV6 will reduce the Range Rover Sport’s entry price to around £51,550 when it arrives next year. The Supercharged Autobiography, with its 5.0-litre V8 tops the range priced at £81,550.

Gerry McGovern, Design Director for Land Rover and Range Rover, said "It is a design and transport transformation from the old car. You can see the DNA of the brand, but it is a revolution in terms of design. It oozes luxury from the inside out.

"Customers have typically been more open minded, and they were open to us being more dramatic in our changes than perhaps with the Range Rover. Our design principles allow us to strike different tunes with different cars - and there's no question the Sport is a strong expression of revolution where the Range Rover was a bold evolution"

Click here for more New York motor show 2013 news.

Our Verdict

Range Rover Sport

The Range Rover Sport offers just the right dynamic twist on the well trodden SUV formula

Join the debate

Comments
42

27 March 2013

Stunning

27 March 2013

An abject failure. The car's only just been unveiled and it's already miles off the pace. No doubt Autocar will still say it's better than the Cayenne, in spite of its inferior 0-60 times.

IAD

27 March 2013

GermanPower wrote:

An abject failure. The car's only just been unveiled and it's already miles off the pace. No doubt Autocar will still say it's better than the Cayenne, in spite of its inferior 0-60 times.

That might be the case, but the Cayenne isn't really a off roader. 

27 March 2013

A Defender is an Off roader - Not a Range Rover nor the footballers model.

I can think of many SUVs that would out perform this overpriced wagon.

And why oh why stick 7 seats in this thing.

Malo Mori Quam Foedari

27 March 2013

Yes you are correct the defender is an off-roader. Unfortunately you clearly don't know the flagship Range Rover is vastly more capable than a defender off road. For a start it can wade through 90cm of water. In a defender you'd have very wet wellies...

All those settings on the console aren't for decoration. Do a LR experience drive and ask the instructors their opinion. I bet they will tell you the new range rover is the daddy!

27 March 2013

GermanPower wrote:

An abject failure. The car's only just been unveiled and it's already miles off the pace. No doubt Autocar will still say it's better than the Cayenne, in spite of its inferior 0-60 times.

It's a big, luxurious, go-anywhere 4 wheel drive car.  Who the hell cares about 0-60 times in cars like these?  This thing is a massive success and so much better than the first version, both inside and out.  People who buy Porsches are unlikely to be swayed by a Range Rover no matter how good it is, and vice versa.  Land Rover will have no problem selling bucket loads of these.

27 March 2013

GermanPower wrote:

An abject failure. The car's only just been unveiled and it's already miles off the pace. No doubt Autocar will still say it's better than the Cayenne, in spite of its inferior 0-60 times.

This is why the Caterham R500 is a far superior car in all respects than the Rolls Royce Phantom, the Lamborghini Aventador, the 911 GT3 and, of course, the Cayenne Turbo S.

27 March 2013

liquidgold wrote:

GermanPower wrote:

An abject failure. The car's only just been unveiled and it's already miles off the pace. No doubt Autocar will still say it's better than the Cayenne, in spite of its inferior 0-60 times.

This is why the Caterham R500 is a far superior car in all respects than the Rolls Royce Phantom, the Lamborghini Aventador, the 911 GT3 and, of course, the Cayenne Turbo S.

 

Pathetic!  How can a product be described as an abject failure before it has established itself in the market or been received, or not, by the buying public?  Are you a soothsayer or do you possess a crystal ball by chance?

 

As for the Caterham being a superior machine to the aforementioned supercars, have a bit of perspective.  Just because a journalist gives an opnion does not make it so

27 March 2013

averageman wrote:

liquidgold wrote:

GermanPower wrote:

An abject failure. The car's only just been unveiled and it's already miles off the pace. No doubt Autocar will still say it's better than the Cayenne, in spite of its inferior 0-60 times.

This is why the Caterham R500 is a far superior car in all respects than the Rolls Royce Phantom, the Lamborghini Aventador, the 911 GT3 and, of course, the Cayenne Turbo S.

 

Pathetic!  How can a product be described as an abject failure before it has established itself in the market or been received, or not, by the buying public?  Are you a soothsayer or do you possess a crystal ball by chance?

 

As for the Caterham being a superior machine to the aforementioned supercars, have a bit of perspective.  Just because a journalist gives an opnion does not make it so

i fear you may have missed the irony in my post. Do you really think anyone could believe a Caterham superior in all respects to a RR Phantom?

27 March 2013
German Power - Ich denke, dass Sie heiße Luft spreche aus deinem Arsch

Pages

Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

  • Lexus LC500
    Car review
    20 October 2017
    Futuristic Lexus LC coupé mixes the latest technology with an old-school atmospheric V8
  • Maserati Levante S GranSport
    First Drive
    20 October 2017
    Get ready to trade in your diesels: Maserati’s luxury SUV finally gets the engine it’s always needed
  • Jaguar XF Sportbrake TDV6
    First Drive
    19 October 2017
    The handsome Jaguar XF Sportbrake exhibits all the hallmarks that makes the saloon great, and with the silky smooth diesel V6 makes it a compelling choice
  • Volkswagen T-Roc TDI
    First Drive
    19 October 2017
    Volkswagen's new compact crossover has the looks, the engineering and the build quality to be a resounding success, but not with this diesel engine
  • BMW M550i
    First Drive
    19 October 2017
    The all-paw M550i is a fast, effortless mile-muncher, but there's a reason why it won't be sold in the UK