Currently reading: BMW X6: pictures, details and video
New 4x4 coupe gets new 407bhp twin-turbo V8; on sale Spring 2008

These are the first official pictures of BMW’s production version of the vanguard X6 four-wheel drive coupe.

The X6 will be the firm's first model to receive a new twin-turbocharged 4.4-litre V8 petrol engine when it goes on sale late next spring. The 90-degree unit, which will power a number of new performance-orientated BMW models in the next 12 months, is billed as a replacement for the company’s existing, normally aspirated 4.8-litre V8, in a move that underlines a commitment toward engine downsizing from Munich, through a combination of twin stage turbocharging and direct injection.

BMW's new firebrand 4x4: X6 xDrive50i


Producing 407bhp at 5500rpm along with a prodigious 443lb ft of torque between 1750rpm and 4500rpm, the blown V8 starring in BMW's range-topping X6 delivers a creditable 40bhp and 81lb ft more than BMW’s naturally aspirated V8.That’s enough to launch the range-topping X6, the 2190kg xDrive50i model, from zero to 62mph in just 5.4sec – better than a 650i automatic. Fuel consumption is a claimed 22.6mpg.

Design and dimensions

Based on the X5’s platform, the X6 shares its wheelbase but it’s longer, by 23mm at 4877mm, and wider, by 50mm at 1983mm. The sloping roof and a lower ride height make it 86mm lower than the X5, at 1690mm.

Despite the X6’s large frontal area and obvious bulk, BMW claims a drag co-efficient of 0.33 – better than a Smart Fortwo - thanks to tricks such as flaps behind the grille that only open when the engine requires additional cooling.

Inside, the X6's cabin and trim design draws heavily on that of the X5. Front seat height is put at 944mm, with individual rear seats for two passengers. Boot capacity is a nominal 570-litres – 70-litres less than the X5 - rising to 1450mm with the split fold rear seat lowered.

Target: best-handling 4x4 on the road


The X6 aims to dislodge the Porsche Cayenne as the best-handling SUV. Building on the X5’s accomplished chassis, it comes with BMW’s new torque vectoring unit that allows drive to be varied between the front and rear axles dependent upon traction, and between the left and right wheels for greater agility, improved traction and less steering effort.

Other improvements on the X5 include a 56mm wider rear track for added stability. Six-cylinder models come as standard with steel springs, with the more upmarket V8 riding on air springs.

The rest of the range

Along with the new twin-turbo V8, the X6 will also be offered with Munich's twin-turbo six-cylinder petrol engine – the 3.0-litre with 306bhp/295lb ft - in the £42,925 xDrive35i.

Back to top

The majority of British sales will come from a pair of 3.0-litre common rail diesels; the twin-turbo 286bhp/428lb ft xDrive35d at £44,135, and the £41,995 235bhp xDrive30d.

Join the debate

Add a comment…
Jon Hardcastle 18 December 2007

Re: BMW X6: pictures, details and video

Kee Law wrote:
I think the success of motors like the Nissan Qashqai

They keep telling us the Qashqai is a success, but where are they? I just don't see them around. Now I see plenty of X3's and X5's.

I agree with everything else you say though!

It's nice when we can all get along.

Jon Hardcastle 17 December 2007

Re: BMW X6: pictures, details and video

scummyplum wrote:

Hang on - that sounds like the county of Cheshire.

What you talkin bout Willis?

The County of Cheshire indeed, although I think I know what you mean.

A completely pointless car, for completely pointless people.

Trust BMW to come up with something like this, problem is due to that badge it will sell. Had it got a Hyundai/Kia or similar badge, it would be shunned.

Bobafari 15 December 2007

Re: BMW X6: pictures, details and video

Well yeah it is just a descriptive news story as opposed to an analytical road test or subjective column, so presumably there's only so many ways to cut and paste the BMW press pack?

"Despite the X6’s large frontal area and obvious bulk, BMW claims a drag co-efficient of 0.33"

This sentence shows a complete lack of understanding of the term drag coefficient. It is a dimensionless unit. A cube face flat to the wind ALWAYS has a drag coefficient of 1. what drag coefficient is is the ratio of drag of the object to the drag of a cube with equivalent frontal area. So just to recap: no, the X6's large frontal area does not make the acheivement of 0.33 Cd more impressive (or less impressive for that matter), it is completely irrelevant - a house brick could well have a higher Cd than a house!

Sorry for being so anal but I find it ever so distressing when I read stuff like this in such a fine publication. Please oh please, if only for the sake of my fragile disposition, can the autocar journo's have some sort of "Wikipedia Wednesday Detention" for occasions like this?!